Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jim@n7us.net: 162 ]

Total 162 documents matching your query.

41. RE: [RTTY] Re: Help with keeping RF out of PC (score: 1)
Author: Jim McDonald <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:29:40 -0700
The RigBlaster Pro isolates the receive cables, but I don't believe the Plus does. Jim N7US _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00162.html (8,015 bytes)

42. [RTTY] RTTY announcements on AR-Clusters (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 07:23:23 -0700
Almost a year ago, we started utilizing the regional announcement capability of AR-Clusters to send announcements of interest only to RTTY ops. It hasn't been mentioned lately so I thought I'd send a
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00100.html (7,470 bytes)

43. [RTTY] FW: [Orion] RTTY GLITCH (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:14:56 -0700
Forwarded from the Orion reflector because W5PJR (on the RTTY Honor Roll) isn't on the RTTY reflector. I have noticed the same in my month-old Orion. Jim N7US Hello Orioneers? As a RTTY DXer I often
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00067.html (8,078 bytes)

44. Re: [RTTY] Comments on "RigExpert" (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:33:09 -0700
It's interesting that the question was asked on the SteppIR reflector originally. I've never used a RigExpert, but it seems to me that he compared it only to his one sound card and is assuming that h
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00037.html (10,427 bytes)

45. [RTTY] 4U1UN spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:24:10 -0700
As a reminder, the cluster system provides real-time spots, including QSL info. 4U1UN has been spotted numerous times. Some AR-Clusters, including mine, have a RTTY Announce function that is sent to
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00030.html (8,219 bytes)

46. Re: [RTTY] ve7cc cluster (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 09:25:39 -0700
I get the same thing. Jim N7US Anyone knows if ve7cc cluster still active. I try connecting, but it connects to to JNOS ve7dfu instead.. Am I missing something.....everything was working ok yesterday
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00036.html (7,303 bytes)

47. Re: [RTTY] 160 Meter RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:19:33 -0500
The diehard weak signal 160 ops do need to be protected or the RTTY ops will provoke a lot of well deserved ill will. 160 is a very special band. It is extremely challenging to work DX. It requires e
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00081.html (21,071 bytes)

48. Re: [RTTY] [FWD: [Dxbase] Logging RTTY via Hamscope (with MMTTYengine) - how sweet it is!!] (score: 1)
Author: Jim McDonald <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 03:04:57 -0700
Being forwarded from the DXbase reflector yesterday to answer a question from K8ZZ. Jim N7US -- Original Message -- Subject: [Dxbase] Logging RTTY via Hamscope (with MMTTY engine) - how sweet it is!!
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00066.html (7,757 bytes)

49. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:13:30 -0500
"One transmitter" seems easy to measure, but a "moderate" antenna systems doesn't. ARRL doesn't allow antenna gain measurements in ads, so I don't know how contesters are supposed to determine whethe
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00207.html (10,535 bytes)

50. [RTTY] SO1R/SO2R listed in combined results? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:22:46 -0500
Would anyone be happier if each station self-declared SO1R or SO2R and that were included in the score rankings similar to the hours expended in some contests? In other words, one list of results but
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00325.html (6,986 bytes)

51. [RTTY] NCDXF Beacons (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:47:33 -0500
I am primarily a DXer who also operates RTTY. As a DXer, I have copied the NCDXF beacons many, many times over the years. They've been written up in QST and many DX publications. As a regular contrib
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00157.html (10,181 bytes)

52. [RTTY] [FWD: Re: RTTY chat?] (score: 1)
Author: Jim McDonald <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:28:22 -0700
ON5KST has a chat web page with chats for low bands, VHF, and others. I have only used the low band one, which is a popular means to exchange "ANNOUNCE" type messages used on DX clusters only to thos
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00229.html (8,200 bytes)

53. [RTTY] Windows Visa OS & Santa Cruz sound card (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:32:34 -0600
I ran the Windows Upgrade Advisor program to see what incompatibilities would be expected if I were to upgrade to the new Windows Vista OS when it is available. The only one of real concern is my San
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00389.html (7,078 bytes)

54. [RTTY] Windows Vista with Santa Cruz (score: 1)
Author: Jim McDonald <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:37:03 -0700
The answer is not what I wanted to hear. Jim N7US Sorry, the Santa Cruz is a discontinued product. We are working on Vista support for our current soundcards (Montego DDL, Riviera and the three Audio
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00399.html (7,544 bytes)

55. Re: [RTTY] [Dxbase] MMTTY -full version- is now interfaced withDXbase - tnxto Oba JA7UDE (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:01:14 -0600
This is excellent news. Would it be possible to use the MMTTY plug-in as Writelog and other programs do? With the plug-in, only the MMTTY tuning indicator is visible (not the full-blown MMTTY program
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00050.html (9,051 bytes)

56. Re: [RTTY] Secondary PCI-Serial Card Instead of USB (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:18:25 -0600
ByteRunner has worked well for me. I've used the built-in COM1 for FSK, though I would expect the ByteRunner serial ports to be the same. Jim N7US --Original Message-- Do you have any recommendations
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00114.html (7,760 bytes)

57. Re: [RTTY] North Dakota was missing in the ARRL RTTY Round Up (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:48:38 -0600
Those who live there say, jokingly, that the cold weather keeps out the riff-raff. Maybe that includes most hams. ;-) Jim N7US --Original Message-- Hello Jared, I'm just a random ham radio operator.
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00123.html (7,328 bytes)

58. Re: [RTTY] North Dakota was missing in the ARRL RTTY Round Up (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:47:10 -0600
Only a little tongue in cheek, I've read that Fargo is a very nice place to live. Add ham radio popularity, and maybe it should be on a contester's list of places to check out. ;-) Jim N7US --Origina
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00128.html (9,701 bytes)

59. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:39:23 -0600
My 160M antenna is far from ideal, as it's not a low noise receiving antenna or a low angle radiator, but it's what I have, and I acknowledge it's better than many others with less space can have. I
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00378.html (11,110 bytes)

60. [RTTY] CQ QRM (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:06:20 -0600
W2QO was having a QSO with W1ZQ on about 1809 when he was QRMed by a CW "ditter." Though I'm disappointed, I'm not really surprised. RTTY is in the ARRL band plan, but that doesn't mean we'll be acce
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00380.html (6,720 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu