Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:john@kk9a.com: 80 ]

Total 80 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY, permanently disable AFC (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:52:09 -0500
Excellent information Ed. I do not use AFC and I find it annoying when it keeps turning itself on. John KK9A One way MMTTY AFC "somehow gets turned on", is using the default userpara.ini file that co
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00245.html (8,625 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY efficiency myth and SUPERFILL (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 06:25:08 -0500
Efficiency is a good thing however rather than eliminate the TU, QSL or other form of acknowledgment, I would eliminate sending the callsign of the station that you are working. Sending P40X before T
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00055.html (10,327 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY efficiency myth and SUPERFILL (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:20:39 -0500
Just to be clear, Since the original post was regarding dropping TU from the acknowledgement, I suggested not sending the callsign in the last line of W6SX's example and only sending TU W6SX CQ. Of c
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00064.html (10,018 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY efficiency myth and SUPERFILL (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:24:59 -0500
Is this a common problem? If I was unsure of the contact I would just call again and make a new QSO. John KK9A This selfish practice can easily be stamped out by not logging the QSO of those who do n
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00074.html (9,184 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] KPA500 on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:37:42 -0500
I have no experience with this amp on RTTY, however if it were me I would try changing the menu setting so that the fan is continuously running at a fast speed. John KK9A &#8203;HI ALL! Has anyone ha
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-08/msg00049.html (7,263 bytes)

26. [RTTY] DXP38 for Sale (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:33:00 -0500
I am selling two of my Hal DXP38 modems. Anyone interested can view the ad on qth.com http://swap.qth.com/view_ad.php?counter=1164807 73, John KK9A - W4AAA - P40A ____________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00036.html (6,295 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] DXP38 for Sale (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:01:22 -0600
Thanks the RTTY list and swap.qth.com both DXP38 units were sold. I have a third one which I intend to hang on to for a little longer. 73, John KK9A I am selling two of my Hal DXP38 modems. Anyone in
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00038.html (6,944 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/4 RTTY on 3606.6 QSX UP!! (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 07:54:08 -0600
Up has nothing to do with it, even calling him on frequency is illegal in the US. Are there are Official Observers (OO) on RTTY? If so they should have been quite busy. John KK9A Tom, I don't find it
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00064.html (8,071 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] Lids running RTTY on the JT65 Frequency (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 21:44:54 -0500
Why are you not complaining about CW on these frequencies. During CQWW CW the bands were packed all the way to xx.100. John KK9A I understand the SSB type bandwidth/tuning in the waterfall behavior.
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00116.html (9,137 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] Lids running RTTY on the JT65 Frequency (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:39:43 -0600
Band plans can be difficult to follow when there is increased activity during a major contest. I have made 40m SSB contacts well down into the CW band (while operating outside the US) and CW contacts
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00131.html (10,271 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] WHY put CQ at the end? (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:15:24 -0600
So I am tuning the band and I hear CQ, now I have to wait for another CQ cycle to hear the guys callsign. I see no advantage to using a different format than other modes but I do end my RTTY transmis
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00105.html (10,161 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] CQWW RTTY results (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:47:00 -0400
When will I get the May issue - August? John KK9A Currently scheduled for the May CQ magazine. Original target was March, but a major rewrite of the log checking software has caused a delay. SSB and
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00111.html (6,810 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] Help for FT-1000-MP Mark V (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:43:30 -0500
I have a number of these transceivers and I use the MicoHAM DigiKeyerII on RTTY. Using the MicroHAM cables it was basically plug and play for FSK. I recall having to change one of the RTTY default se
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00128.html (9,006 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] More GRITTY observations (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:19:58 -0500
I used the same settings for running and S&P. My AFC is kept off. John KK9A REPLY: The need for AFC has always been an annoyance for me. AFC was developed back in the days of crystal control when cry
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00198.html (9,254 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:36:34 -0400
VA2UP was referring to sending his callsign during a CQ which is something that you do often on the same frequency. I send my call twice when I respond to a CQ and I do not recall getting a single re
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00078.html (8,568 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:03:05 -0400
Not only is it a waste of time, DE can be a source of error. More than once last weekend the state did not decode and the DE did, leading me to believe that the station I was working was in Delaware.
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00158.html (8,952 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY Raw Scores (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:11:16 -0400
Was Classic an overlay in 2014? I could not find it in the magazine results article. John KK9A - W4AAA Our log checking software does not compute raw scores for the overlay categories and we do not p
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00047.html (7,076 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] Wanna Work More Stations? Have more fun? (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:19:43 -0400
I worked a number of stations in CQWW RTTY that sent my callsign four times during the QSO and their section and state only once. I am pretty aware of the callsign that I was using but I have no idea
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00072.html (9,198 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] Contester preference - 1- versus 2-decimal-place spots (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:04:51 -0400
Do you abhor AFC in all of the multiple decoders that you using? John KK9A Good point about AFC. I abhor that feature and never use it, so don't consider it much. To the extent spots are accurate to
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00090.html (8,959 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] Friend File (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 22:08:07 -0500
That is a perfect way to use the friend file! John KK9A I don't say 'hi' to everyone because I don't know everyone. If someone is running, you shouldn't do it, unless you know them really well, as it
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00028.html (8,313 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu