Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jpreston1@cox.net: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Escrow agent ?? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 08:40:48 -0800
Be very careful. Check out this url. http://www.carbuyingtips.com/fraud.htm Scroll part way down the page to the article "The Fraudulent Escrow Service Scam". While this page is more related to buyin
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00069.html (7,902 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] DXCC Questions (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 07:28:14 -0800
The CQ DX award is only issued for CW, SSB and RTTY. No separate category for other digital modes. CQ WPX doesn't even mention RTTY. The WAZ award does have a digital mode separate from RTTY. CQ webs
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00045.html (8,226 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Correction & Apologies (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 08:35:28 -0700
Yes, but CQ-WW-RTTY goes in the CONTEST: field, not in the CAREGORY: field. Notice that the only options for mode-category in the CATEGORY: field are CW, SSB or MIXED. The problem is that Writelog wa
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00030.html (9,761 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Round-Up Rules - QUESTIONs about band changes,etc. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:34:58 -0800
I would like an Assisted or Unlimited category added to the contest. I enjoy using packet when the rules permit. Packet isn't just for working new mults. It is also useful for finding stations you ha
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00078.html (8,643 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Round-Up Rules - QUESTIONs about band changes,etc. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:43:48 -0800
Yes, but then those who use packet have to enter as a multiop, and compete with those stations who have relief operators. Also, nowhere in my e-mail did I say that it was broken, and I'm not trying t
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00083.html (9,793 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Round-Up Rules - QUESTIONs about band changes,etc. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:14:59 -0800
The category would be SO Assisted (or Unlimited), not just SO. Since it would be a separate category, it would not be in competition with SO. If ALL single-ops were allowed to use packet (not as a se
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00093.html (10,056 bytes)

7. [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:45:55 -0800
The FCC is inviting comments on the bandwidth proposal. Details are on the ARRL site at this url: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/01/09/2/?nc=1 I suggest that every RTTY op take a close look at
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00288.html (7,304 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:41:57 -0800
Joe, If this is true, then it means that RTTY can be used all the way to the high end of the phone bands. I think this rule change could open a large hornet's nest, and would cause more problems than
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00314.html (10,294 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] CQWW RTTY 2006 VK4UC SOAB HP (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 06:02:03 -0700
In many cases we "concentrate" on those 1 (and 2) point qso's out of necissity due to poor propagation. From my QTH Europe was almost nonexistant. Most of my 3 point QSO's were South America and JA.
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00210.html (8,294 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] WPX RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:44:00 -0800
This is a direct quote from the rules: "Any form of DX alerting assistance is permitted in ALL categories. This seems to contradict what you said about ASSISTED having to enter as a multi-op. 73, Jim
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00052.html (7,119 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] LOTW DCXCC - WHO HAS WHAT? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:25:32 -0700
Andrei, I have 147 total countries worked on RTTY. Confirmed - 121 via CARD - 115 via LOTW - 60 (several are confirmed both ways) 73, Jim N6VH Andrei Stchislenok wrote: ______________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00114.html (7,717 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] N8S Swain'S Island QSL (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:08:18 -0700
I have received the cards, but no LOTW. Bill, how did you get the LOTW confirmations? I searched for N8S on LOTW, and it says "no log data found". Jim N6VH ___________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00067.html (7,850 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Macro Guidance (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:14:26 -0700
Bob, Welcome to RTTY contesting. Your log doesn't have to be competitive to submit it. The more logs submitted, the easier it is for the log-checkers to cross-check them. My logs are never competitiv
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00439.html (8,242 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] U.S.A CONTEST (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:48:49 -0700
From the NAQP Rules: 3. North American Station: Defined by the ARRL's DXCC list with the addition of KH6. 73, Jim N6VH _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-07/msg00132.html (8,243 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:22:23 -0700
It doesn't have to be a newbee. :-) I have been know to tap the wrong key by mistake, usually about once a contest. 73, Jim N6VH _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00193.html (11,519 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:21:55 -0700
Jay, Actually, I'm old enough that I probably forget the other times. 73, Jim N6VH _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00196.html (13,457 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] Renaming RTTY RU & Rookie RU to Digital RU (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:27:22 -0700
Dick, What statements have been made by the ARRL that says they no longer consider RTTY a legitimate mode? I have seen nothing that indicates that. They are simply renaming the certificate to reflect
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00198.html (8,864 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:09:48 -0800
When I'm the S/P station, I prefer the run station to use line 3 also. I would, however, leave out the CR/LF at the end, but do use one or two spaces instead. Line 3 gives the receiving station a 2nd
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00152.html (10,220 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] Rtty Write won't un-key on 40 meters ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 16:43:53 -0700
Rick, Why not just use MMTTY instead of RTTYWrite? Jim N6VH On 9/29/2012 7:39 PM, Rick wrote: Well guys, that's what I thought EXCEPT I can switch to MMTTY and use the SAME hardware and everything wo
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00182.html (10,589 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] Rtty Write won't un-key on 40 meters ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 07:08:00 -0700
Rick, Integrate MMTTY with Writelog. The instructions are here: http://writelog.com/downloads/third-party Scroll down to the section that says "MMTTYPluginforWritelog_V13.Exe" The combination works g
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00006.html (12,188 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu