- 341. Re: [RTTY] AA5AU Contest Notes for 2013 WPX RTTY Contest (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:41:57 -0600
- Hello Don... Thanks for posting your article / experience during CQ WPX RTTY. I too have been forming my opinion regarding the comparison of MMTTY and 2Tone. To cut to the chase, I have come to the s
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00315.html (9,027 bytes)
- 342. Re: [RTTY] AA5AU Contest Notes for 2013 WPX RTTY Contest (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:32:19 -0600
- Thanks for the clarification Al... N1MM Logger uses it's own log synching protocol to keep multiple copies of the logs synchronized. There is one important distinction. Because each computer on the n
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00318.html (9,433 bytes)
- 343. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY contest on Saturday February 23 (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:18:16 -0600
- Hello Mark... Can you (or someone) please clarify the following Single Operator Entry Classification: "Entry Classification: a. Single Operator i. One person performs all transmitting, receiving, spo
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00390.html (9,924 bytes)
- 344. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY contest on Saturday February 23 (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:33:34 -0600
- Thanks Mike... For the seasoned contester that grew up with the development of the network, they will know and understand the nuances of "spotting" in the context that you described... that is, being
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00395.html (12,182 bytes)
- 345. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY contest on Saturday February 23 (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:51:48 -0600
- Yes, that's true about the change to N1MM Logger. This morning I submitted a change request for the NAQP modules to default to Single Operator. If "Assisted" is not available for selection, that migh
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00398.html (13,204 bytes)
- 346. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY contest on Saturday February 23 (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:09:45 -0600
- Hello Mark... Thanks for your reply and clarification. I sent my second message to the list before I found your reply. I do hope the wording of the rules is reviewed by the NAQP managers. One of the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00399.html (13,237 bytes)
- 347. Re: [RTTY] NAQP Name (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:43:16 -0600
- Cheryl is right, you can use any name you want. There have been some contests where it seems like 50% of the names are the same, as the radio fraternity/sorority honors a -SK- contester. But you guys
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00455.html (8,872 bytes)
- 348. Re: [RTTY] NAQP Names (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:15:31 -0600
- Heh heh... maybe we can start a 'minor revolt' against pre-populated logging, because contests are now only an exchange of call signs? How about everyone use their mother's maiden name, or favorite c
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00463.html (8,435 bytes)
- 349. Re: [RTTY] NAQP Names (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:52:26 -0600
- I think you're onto something Don... QSL AA5AU 599 TOO KØRC 73 de Bob - KØRC (for now) -- 73, Don AA5AU --Original Message-- From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tim Richardso
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00476.html (9,647 bytes)
- 350. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:39:52 -0500
- I saw someone sending "UTC" between the serial number and the time. That was unexpected and confusing, to say the least! He must have got yelled at because when I heard him a couple hours later, the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00101.html (11,061 bytes)
- 351. Re: [RTTY] K3 reduced-bandwidth RTTY analysis (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:42:33 -0500
- The only way we're going to clean up the bands quickly is to pass legislation equivalent to the "Cash for Clunkers" program. You know, something like "Your old rig plus $100 for a brand new K3". We c
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00169.html (10,667 bytes)
- 352. Re: [RTTY] 2013 Roundup Results (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:53:48 -0500
- In order to eliminate this problem (moving the VFO and loosing the contact before it's logged) you should put a {LOG} command in your S&P F2 key. The contact will be logged right after you send your
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00072.html (11,950 bytes)
- 353. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 20:39:52 -0500
- This is the first time I have read the CAC recommendation regarding the ARRL RTTY RU contest. The key area that needed attention in my opinion was making the "Two off-periods" requirement understanda
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00016.html (9,962 bytes)
- 354. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:57:11 -0500
- Sorry but the "no more than two blocks" is stated in the OLD rule, not the proposed NEW rule. The NEW rule says the operating time will be calculated by subtracting the TWO longest blocks of time fro
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00029.html (12,719 bytes)
- 355. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 00:22:54 -0500
- This is still wrong. In your example 6+0=6 you are counting hours. The suggested new rule requires a count of two off times. There is only one off time in 6+0=6. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN -- Al AB2ZY OR
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00040.html (9,967 bytes)
- 356. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:16:46 -0500
- Here's my log: 720 QSOs, 1 per minute for 12 hours 0 QSOs, not operating for 6 hours 720 QSOs, 1 per minute for 12 hours My "first QSO" is at 0000z. My "last QSO" is 30 hours later. Please write a fo
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00046.html (12,736 bytes)
- 357. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:08:25 -0500
- "You're insisting on reading an interpretation into the rule (that everyone must take a minimum of two breaks with one lasting at least 30 minutes) that has no rational basis given the history and co
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00048.html (17,182 bytes)
- 358. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 22:50:14 -0500
- Hello John, I have done just that. I exchanged my concerns regarding the new wording of rule 2.2 for the ARRL RTTY RU with Al Dewey, KØAD, the author of the CAC paper.. I also noted that the rule cha
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00057.html (17,939 bytes)
- 359. Re: [RTTY] More News on SARTG log robot (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:35:24 -0500
- The first part of the answer to #2: We have by tradition counted 10 points for QSO outside your call area and 5 points inside. The second part of the answer: All claimed scores will be recalculated,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00074.html (8,060 bytes)
- 360. Re: [RTTY] 300hz or 500hz IF filter? (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:02:33 -0500
- "...but experience tells me narrow is better for contesting, perhaps wider for weak signals but if they are that weak most won't hear them at all during a contest which is why DXing if different from
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00100.html (11,218 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu