- 1. [WriteLog] Re:Windows (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:57:51 +0000
- Microsoft has announced 4 new security patches, including 1 critical update for all versions of Windows from XP to 98. See CBSNEWS.COM for details. The server for the updates is apparently overloaded
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00169.html (7,025 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:09:01 +0000
- I'd like to throw this out just for opinion. Someone recently mentioned that his Turtle Beach sound card scored a 7b on the WL test. I just installed mine and it came back as a 7f, the highest. Now,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00195.html (8,708 bytes)
- 3. [RTTY] Re: (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 13:03:49 +0000
- Guys, I know it's off topic, but my daughter in law needs a copy of the original Windows 98, or the upgrade from 95. If anyone has it and would like to sell it, please reply to me directly. Now to go
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00015.html (6,469 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] FT920 and FSK RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:53:48 +0000
- OK, assuming you are using an NPN transistor interface to key the FSK line, simply reverse the BASE-EMITTER connections. ( Base is now grounded ) That will invert the signal from MTTY to the FSK line
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00041.html (7,038 bytes)
- 5. [RTTY] Re: FCC (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:21:55 +0000
- FWIW, just copied a FCC bull from ARRL and it seems our friends at the FCC are increasing the fee for vanity call applications to $20.80 starting Aug. 6. Increase of about 33%. And who said "inflatio
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00085.html (6,375 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] Re: new SCC rules (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:31:40 +0000
- -- All the discussion has been interesting, but in the final analysis, it will depend on whether a log is submitted or for that matter, whether people don't participate. I will not participate. I've
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00094.html (8,165 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] Distortion = QSD (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:59:22 +0000
- Mike, and others have a very positive attitude. But, I would like to ask just what equipment is required to properly send a "QSD"? There are many factors other than the sound card and what you are se
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00231.html (7,222 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] W0ETC SCC RTTY Championship (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:23:04 +0000
- Think Mike has hit the hammer on the head, or whatever. I greatly admire those hams who are multi lingual. But only those whose native language is English can generally get it right the first time. (
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00360.html (8,262 bytes)
- 9. [RTTY] RITTY (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 04:25:06 +0000
- Guys, I just noticed I have the complete documentation to RITTY by Beasley in WORD format. If anyone wants it, reply to me directly. Otherwise, I intend to destroy the file. 73 Ed ___________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00370.html (6,541 bytes)
- 10. [RTTY] Re: RITTY (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:46:29 +0000
- Some kind soul has bought up the fact that this documentation may be copywrited. On examining the file, there is no copywrite notice of any type. I have no idea where I got this file since the copy o
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00379.html (7,212 bytes)
- 11. Re: [RTTY] Timewave DSP 599zx (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:31:23 +0000
- Got a new one delivered to me yesterday but have a question. Is it advisable to leave the Radio Shack isolation transformers in place from the transceiver? And should one add an additional transforme
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00104.html (6,733 bytes)
- 12. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:06:58 +0000
- Along with the other comments which say, "work them", I'd like to add one more. I always consider the possibility that "I" screwed up, and didn't enter the correct call in the first place. Better to
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00256.html (7,490 bytes)
- 13. Re: [RTTY] Who's Name (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 20:14:52 +0000
- -- Yep, remember it, but not which contest. And it gave Writelog a headache. Only solution I found was to just enter some name and then edit the QSO. PITA 73 Ed ______________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00044.html (7,514 bytes)
- 14. Re: [RTTY] Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 04:32:38 +0000
- -- I heard it also, and just stayed there in the hope he would id. Never did. But, there's another side to the story. Another station which I had just worked was on that frequency when 9A5W just show
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00176.html (7,513 bytes)
- 15. Re: [RTTY] Re: Sad Comment on Operator Age (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:57:28 +0000
- Not from the ones I worked. I'm going to disect my Cabrillo file and figure out the median age. I'm pretty sure it is going to be in the 60s at least. Think W1WY was my oldest at 82, and know I work
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00226.html (8,106 bytes)
- 16. [RTTY] Re:JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:25:58 +0000
- JARTS WW RTTY Contest CALL: K4SB Single OP., All Band Low QSOs Points DX: Call Areas 80m: 0 0 0 0 40m: 102 234 19 14 20m: 189 463 33 17 15m: 227 662 43 9 10m: 6 17 5 0 Total 524 Score: 192640 Bands w
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00233.html (6,864 bytes)
- 17. [RTTY] Re: [RTTY AGE (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:47:04 +0000
- Well, just disected my log and came up with an average age of 55.3 And yes, I directed the program to ignor 99. Surprised me. Just goes to you all you old farts are out West. Ed, Old fart #30 _______
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00260.html (8,478 bytes)
- 18. Re: [RTTY] RITTY 4.5 Issue (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:30:50 +0000
- Usually, this statement is automatically inserted, but basically, it merely sets the sound card address, irq, and something else I can't remember. Well, don't hold my feet to the fire for this, but I
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00332.html (7,975 bytes)
- 19. Re: [RTTY] Re: ÄRTTYÅ RITTY 4.5 Issue (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:06:02 +0000
- Part of the SET Blaster statement will make reference to mscdex.exe, which is the driver. Well, not absolutely, but config,sys is where you direct the computer to place statements such as DOS=HIGH, U
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00334.html (8,435 bytes)
- 20. Re: [RTTY] Re: RITTY 4.5 Issue (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:32:23 +0000
- An easier way is to look for a slot which is either mounted so the front card edge almost touches the back of the motherboard (ISA), or a slot which is mounted way back on the motherboard. (PCI) They
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00341.html (6,957 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu