Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4sb@bellsouth.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sb@bellsouth.net: 63 ]

Total 63 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:19:40 +0000; John Becker wrote: Andy has a very good point. If we want to play with them we are going have to do it between 1838 and 1842. Ray Charles could see this. John, W0JAB -- Unfortunately, Ray Charles doe; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00435.html (7,860 bytes)
62. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:22:39 +0000; Sounds perfect! and CQ TEST 1805 DE <THE EUROPEANS> ? I still cannot realize why we would use 1805 for RTTY. That is a prime CW frequency for DXing. Maybe someone will explain why we can't go higher; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00010.html (6,831 bytes)
63. Re: [RTTY] ARRL 160 Band Plan (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 03:17:12 +0000; You are typical of the class of self serving jerks who hasn't bothered to learn what amateur radio is about, its history, or even enough about the technology to understand when you are wrong. You don; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00044.html (7,732 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 63
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]