Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4sb@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sb@comcast.net: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] DXP-38 & WF1B RTTY502 (score: 1): Author: k4sb <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 19:14:15 +0000; It seems at one time I ran a search for that error and the information returned was more specific. Worth a try? 73 Ed _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contestin; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-05/msg00018.html (7,327 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:01:49 +0000; I for one am completely turned off by this constant exchange. I am sick and tired of hearing this year after year, and I am running out of filters to delete this garbage. Just how long do you plan o; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00321.html (9,897 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Com port gurus? (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:08:37 +0000; Bill, assuming you are using some version of XP, goto System, then Device Manager, and click on the little monitor at the very top. That will show you who's using what as far as the IRQs go. 73 Ed __; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00092.html (7,361 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:44:35 +0000; Seriously though, this is totally inappropriate use of the RTTY reflector. These poor bastards and I, quite frankly, probably didn't even know about the beacon(s). Why not be a nice guy and explain i; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00128.html (8,747 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:48:36 +0000; you'll have K6SAD coming in calling "CQ Ragchew" just to interrupt anyone contesting near HIS frequency In this case, I'd fully support this LID being given his own frequency. If nothing else, then t; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00129.html (7,699 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Latest computers advice please (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 02:58:34 +0000; Peter, you might try a Gigabyte K8 Triton. Uses an AMD Athelon ( mine is 3400 gb )2 Onboard serial ports, 1 LPT, 5 PCI slots, IDE or SATA interface ( mine has SATA ) Very reasonably priced for all co; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00013.html (7,331 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 48, Issue 8 (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:38:59 +0000; Probably the best solution by Bob. It's been so long since I've worked with DOS that I can't remember if it will automatically reset the date if you tell it it's another year, but if it doesn't, you; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00027.html (6,948 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Have RTTY ops become SSB ops? (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:36:02 +0000; I think one of the gys hit it on the head when he says it just a common lack of courtsy. Now, there is one solution. When all of EU ( or any other keep calling away, just work them. And write down th; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00051.html (7,846 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] 80m RTTY freqs. (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:34:18 +0000; Glad Jim brought this up because what he says and what CQ magazine says are 180 degrees apart. Column by some W5 specifically states that Extra class ops ONLY can go above 3.6. Be nice to get a clari; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00029.html (6,743 bytes)
10. [RTTY] OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 04:49:50 +0000; Great fun in the contest, but my rig is giving me fits on the RIT offset needed. With the OMNI, Rx is ALWAYS on LSB. Which means that FSK on the rig must be offset, generally about -1.40 on RX RIT. P; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00069.html (6,356 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] tracking self-spotters (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:34:51 +0000; Nelson Moyer wrote: I guess I can't see the harm in self spotting on the clusters, except for contest participants. I think it is a good thing on the low bands when rare DX stations (defined as any e; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00006.html (7,839 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] WPX 2007 (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:51:28 +0000; Concerning all the different exchanges sent last weekend. I was delighted at seeing all the new calls, but I agree with others that some of the "newbies" need an education. Of course, Don's site has; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00184.html (7,454 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] WPX 2007 (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:23:43 +0000; Jim, and others, have always been a gret source for info, but my point is how do we get it to those who don't know about them? 73 Ed _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00205.html (7,835 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] WPX 2007 (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:21:10 +0000; Now that is one hell of a good idea when we see an error by a newbie. 73 Ed _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00230.html (7,960 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 03:57:10 +0000; Bill Turner wrote: ""And remember, to the best of my knowledge the first WAS and DXCC on 160 RTTY has yet to be earned. Who will be first?" Like Shelby, I too have WAS on 160, and the certificate is; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00364.html (8,869 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:57:12 +0000; I really would like to jump on to 160 Meters with RTTY and am wondering if any of you fellows have any stories you can share with me... OK, admittedly 160 is difficult. But, if the necessary real est; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00376.html (8,907 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] CQ QRM (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:04:12 +0000; Bill Turner wrote: ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:06:20 -0600, "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net> wrote: W2QO was having a QSO with W1ZQ on about 1809 when he was QRMed by a CW "ditter." Though; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00438.html (7,577 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] CQ QRM (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:12:43 +0000; Bill Turner wrote: If by "traditional frequencies" you mean 80 kHz up from the lower band edge, that would be fine with me for North America, but there is a problem with the frequency allocations for; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00462.html (7,488 bytes)
19. [RTTY] 5v7se (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:48:23 +0000; 5V7SE ON NOW 14.085.35 2047z 73 eD _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00044.html (5,869 bytes)
20. [RTTY] DX (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:47:54 +0000; 5V7SE on 14.089.76 NOW Time is 2048Z 73 Ed _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00061.html (5,916 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]