Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ww@arrl.net: 527 ]

Total 527 documents matching your query.

241. [RTTY] CQ Robot (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 06:40:09 -0400
The CQ robot is very particular about "category" for Cabrillo submission! The WriteLog created Cabrillo category: CATEGORY: SINGLE-OP-ASSISTED ALL LOW RTTY will be returned. The accepted categories a
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00154.html (7,190 bytes)

242. [RTTY] K4WW SOAB(A)LP (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:39:01 -0400
Darn, I miss my AL-1200, but it will be back! Very well satisfied with the effort, especially with the difficulty of finding, and holding, a frequency. I had a two (2) hour run, mostly into Europe, b
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00163.html (7,777 bytes)

243. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:09:07 -0400
Richard Ferch wrote: "All this talk wishing there was a North American RTTY contest that low power stations could be competitive in, and not one mention of the NAQP RTTY? Is everyone suffering from a
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00226.html (7,800 bytes)

244. Re: [RTTY] Age (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:14:01 -0400
Russ, WA3FRP wrote: "I wonder what will happen when we are 88!" Personally, I look forward to any/all age that is above the one I'm fortunate to have. Hopefully, someday, I'll be able to send a "thre
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00175.html (7,305 bytes)

245. [RTTY] K4WWSOABLP (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 05:35:30 -0400
Hopefully it's never too late for a "COF" to learn some valuable lessons? Along with Bill, W6WRT, especially in these band conditions, I seldom operate low power, when high power is an option. Hopefu
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00199.html (8,994 bytes)

246. Re: [RTTY] W0ETC Plaque for the RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 05:21:39 -0400
Robert Ruvolo wrote: "The NCJ should do something to recognize Larry. He was instrumentental in forming NAQP RTTY teams which really increased participation." There is "something in the works"!! Plea
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00331.html (6,730 bytes)

247. Re: [RTTY] W&Oslash;ETC Funeral (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 06:04:01 -0500
Pat Rundall N&Oslash;HR wrote: "During the service, the pastor made the comment that Larry had some strong opinions on a number of topics - but at least you always knew where he stood" I can only hop
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00016.html (7,097 bytes)

248. [RTTY] W0ETC Memorial Plaque (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 06:12:30 -0500
Thanks to Ray Novak, N9JA, Division Manager - Amateur Products, ICOM America, Inc., effective with February 2006 NAQP RTTY, each member of the first place team will receive a plaque. This plaque will
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00017.html (6,476 bytes)

249. Re: [RTTY] W0ETC Memorial Plaque (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:18:06 -0500
There seems to be some mis-interpretation on my message, regarding the W0ETC memorial plaque. This plaque will be presented to each member of the NAQP RTTY winning team, in accordance with NAQP rules
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00022.html (7,310 bytes)

250. Re: [RTTY] did anyone write (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:36:24 -0500
FireBrick wrote: "I was in SS and was quite surprised to see stations working at 7080" "guilty as charged" I made many of my 124, 40 meter contacts, above 7080. I certainly hope I didn't bother any R
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00047.html (6,890 bytes)

251. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Round-Up Rules - QUESTIONs about band changes,etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:41:21 -0500
Jim Preston wrote: "I would like an Assisted or Unlimited category added to the contest. I enjoy using packet when the rules permit." The rules http://www.arrl.org/contests/rules/2006/rtty.html alrea
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00080.html (8,220 bytes)

252. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:22:05 -0500
Scott Nichols wrote: "IMO, forcing ASSISTED ops into the MULTI category only DIScourages participation and ENcourages cheating" Not sure I understand, how being "forced into a Multi category, discour
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00095.html (9,837 bytes)

253. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:00:04 -0500
WW3S asked: "So whats the difference between Muli-Single and SO2R? The number of operators?" SO is not limited to 6 band changes, regardless of the number of transmitters being used! I'm convinced th
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00101.html (9,270 bytes)

254. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 09:30:03 -0500
Bill Coleman wrote: "The proper channel is the Contest Advisory Committee (CAC), or through your ARRL Director." Finally, some facts, rather than opinions! C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00147.html (7,911 bytes)

255. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RU band change question (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:38:24 -0500
David Ashworth said: "Single op, low power, no spotting, just me. If I read the rules correctly, am I still limited to six band changes per clock hour?" Not sure where that reasoning came from? The r
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00151.html (7,300 bytes)

256. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 05:17:22 -0500
Tom Osborne wrote: "When I ran 1 radio and an amp, I would just come in and turn the rig on and go. When it was over, turn it off till the next contest. Ho Hum. just get on and have fun-that's what i
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00171.html (9,731 bytes)

257. Re: [RTTY] Did OK accept Cabrillo last year? (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:37:44 -0500
Don Hill wrote: "There is some question as to whether or not a Cabrillo file can be sent to the OK DX RTTY manager as an official file. The rules do not mention Cabrillo. Did they accept Cabrillo las
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00182.html (7,665 bytes)

258. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:54:52 -0500
Bill Coleman wrote: "So, your statement #1 is incorrect. The use of more than one transmitted signal is PROHIBITED for the single operator category." 99.9% correct, just don't forget "at any given ti
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00223.html (9,959 bytes)

259. Re: [RTTY] Our turn at a poll (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:09:21 -0500
C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00251.html (9,083 bytes)

260. [RTTY] Happy Holidays (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:19:22 -0500
To one, and all...a very Safe and Happy Holiday season! ps: Please manage to appear in my log, many times during 2006. C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00289.html (6,354 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu