Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ww@arrl.net: 527 ]

Total 527 documents matching your query.

261. [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:58:46 -0500
Dick Thompson wrote: "I would like to put forth a suggestion to those who are entering the ARRL RTTY Contest, especially the newer people. The report that you send is a signal report & State or Provi
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00341.html (7,933 bytes)

262. Re: [RTTY] Sending DE before a callsign (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:38:06 -0500
David Hachadorian wrote: "You can also verify that it's working by actually sending the string on one radio and copying it on another." Kindasorta difficult, when "the other radio" is sitting in it's
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00372.html (7,644 bytes)

263. [RTTY] Fw: RE: NAQP RTTY on NCDXF Beacon] (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:27:25 -0500
It seems that there were some stations, during ARRL RTTY Roundup, that were transmitting on 14.100? In future NAQP RTTY contests, please refrain from transmitting, +/- 2KHz of 14.100. Thanks. Shelby
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00075.html (8,236 bytes)

264. [RTTY] K4WW M/S LP (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:03:53 -0500
I had good intentions of making this a "full blown" 24 hour effort, but didn't quite make it. I've learned that my brain is far more willing, than my body. The activity seemed to be considerably high
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00108.html (9,006 bytes)

265. Re: [RTTY] The Iron Butt Award goes to..... (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:53:31 -0500
Never having been on the receiving end of a "never ending" pileup, I can only imagine what it's like? Adrenaline is a strong "motivator", but what will happen when the adrenaline "runs out"? C'Ya, Sh
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00165.html (7,045 bytes)

266. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY on NCDXF Beacon] (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:55:38 -0500
I, personally, did not initiate the +/- 2 KHz request, I was just relaying the message? I believe that "we" are all smart enough to know how close "we" can operate to the NCDXF beacon frequency, 14.1
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00193.html (8,483 bytes)

267. [RTTY] Contest Multipliers (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:03:23 -0500
As a "relative" newcomer, to RTTY, I'm curious as to why several contest's use VK as a multiplier? Obviously, I understand the reasoning for ANARTS, but why the others? I have 168 VK contacts, since
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00335.html (6,936 bytes)

268. [RTTY] VE2RRY (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 05:29:36 -0500
I received this from WA7BNM: "Certificates for all eligible single-op entrants have been distributed, except for VE2RYY. The email address he supplied with his entry and the e-mail address listed at
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00445.html (6,317 bytes)

269. Re: [RTTY] SCC RTTY Contest 2005 - official results (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:48:19 -0500
Waldemar DK3VN wrote: "Should every contest sponsor provide all UBN reports (and similar reports) on the web, accessible for everyone?" IMHO....absolutely! By doing so, each participant can view thei
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00464.html (7,259 bytes)

270. [RTTY] NAQP SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:09:06 -0500
microphone = an instrument whereby sound waves are caused to generate or modulate an electric current usually for the purpose of transmitting Those of you, that are not involved in UK RTTY, and still
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00467.html (6,652 bytes)

271. Re: [RTTY] UKDX RTTY AA5VU Single Op LP (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:07:00 -0500
Bill Turner wrote, regarding use of RIT: :TX and RX on different frequencies. It's easy to forget. I do it myself from time to time. :-)" Depending on the choice of software, there is a function to r
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00487.html (7,387 bytes)

272. Re: [RTTY] QSL cards (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:56:23 -0500
Scott Nichols wrote: "I too reply-QSL 100%, direct or burro, SASE or no SASE...It's the final courtesy of a QSO in my books" As I don't consider a contest contact a "real" QSO, I also subscribe to th
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00579.html (7,247 bytes)

273. [RTTY] KI5XP others may delete (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:00:26 -0500
Charlie, please send me an email. I've lost your email address. Thanks C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00727.html (6,463 bytes)

274. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:38:51 -0500
Ron Kolarik wrote: "Before anyone is tempted to answer this individual, even politely, read this in the archives http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/rtty/2005-September/015704.html" The inability o
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00729.html (7,280 bytes)

275. Re: [RTTY] Help me decide between two rigs (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:09:32 -0500
Absolutely one sure way of generating multiple opinions....ask the reflector? If anyone/everyone doesn't recommend their present rig, then they must not have the right one? Personally, if I didn't th
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00022.html (8,153 bytes)

276. [RTTY] 40 Meter RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:40:38 -0500
Dick Kriss, AA5VU wrote: "It was a part time fun contest even with the 40 meter CW Jammer at 7.035 MHz." I hate to hear that, as I plan on SOSB40, in WPX! Other than JA stations, which are restricted
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00059.html (7,358 bytes)

277. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] 40 meters on Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:00:29 -0500
Richard Ferch wrote: "Besides the CQ WPX RTTY, there will also be the NA CW Sprint and the CW pileups on 3Y0X. It promises to be a real zoo on 40. Of course, if it gets bad, here in North America we
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00119.html (7,152 bytes)

278. Re: [RTTY] They should reschedule the Olympics (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:43:18 -0500
Jerry Flanders wrote: "They shouldn't have the Olympics on the same weekend as the CQ-WW-WPX, certainly not now that I have a new bigscreen Hi Def TV." I thought all you SO2R operators could watch mo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00130.html (8,516 bytes)

279. Re: [RTTY] TCG NAQP RTTY TEAMS (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:20:44 -0500
W4BCG wrote: "This will be a good contest time to remember our deceased friend, W0ETC "LAR IA" Just a reminder, that each member of the winning team, M/2 is not considered a team, will receive a W0ET
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00254.html (6,916 bytes)

280. Re: [RTTY] Dayton (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:12:16 -0500
may asked: "Are any of the RTTY Gang going to Dayton?" I'm not sure about the Hamvention site. I've been promised, by the Hamvention forum chairman, a "dedicated" RTTY forum, time slot, at Hara Arena
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00275.html (6,614 bytes)

Current List: 261 - 280
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu