Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ww@arrl.net: 527 ]

Total 527 documents matching your query.

281. [RTTY] K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:53:39 -0500
Well, "another one bites the dust"! With 10 meters non-existent, and 15 meters marginal, at best, it left for very crowded conditions on 20. Contacts were up, from last February, on 40/80, but multip
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00346.html (7,595 bytes)

282. [RTTY] NAQP Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:35:19 -0500
According to the rules, http://www.ncjweb.com/naqprules.php the preferred method of log submission for Cabrillo-formatted logs is via the web form http://www.ncjweb.com/naqplogsubmit.php rather than
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00356.html (7,109 bytes)

283. [RTTY] NAQP RTTY SO1R Team Score (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:36:03 -0500
WX4TM 85800 W1ZT 72897 K9MUG 71712 K4WW 58786 W6WRT 34385 Total 323580 "claimed" And not a person had to "wait for our exchange"! :)) C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _____________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00364.html (6,887 bytes)

284. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:15:20 -0500
"run it similar to the old Novice Roundup days... instead of one 4-hour shot, spread it out" WOW....Novice Roundup...what a pleasant memory! Not necessarily for me, but for my son, who was 10, at the
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00426.html (8,624 bytes)

285. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:41:28 -0500
"Andy has a very good point. If we want to play with them we are going have to do it between 1838 and 1842." Personally, I believe, that US stations operating RTTY, between 1838-1842, are only asking
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00433.html (9,320 bytes)

286. [RTTY] NCJ RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:50:27 -0500
NCJ RTTY Sprint http://www.ncjweb.com/sprintrules.php for the rules, will be Sunday, March 12, 0000-0400. Your participation in this "organized" mayhem, will be appreciated. Please read, and note: "F
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00434.html (6,535 bytes)

287. [RTTY] NAQP Log Submission (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 04:46:10 -0500
Please don't forget: "Entries must be postmarked no later than 14 days after the contest to be eligible for awards." The list of logs received: http://www.ncjweb.com/rttynaqplogs.php The preferred lo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00023.html (6,728 bytes)

288. Re: [RTTY] 160 Band Plan/RTTY On 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:34:43 -0500
Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: " If, after extensive monitoring in multiple areas of the US by several experienced operators, ARRL believed it was best to move W1AW to 1807.5 it should have done so. It shou
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00037.html (7,487 bytes)

289. [RTTY] WA9ALS..others may delete (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 12:02:32 -0500
John, send me an email. Your QRZ listed email is bouncing? C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00090.html (6,199 bytes)

290. Re: [RTTY] After the contest... (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 16:46:35 -0500
I2UIY wrote: "After I finished my log-checking work for CQWW RTTY 2005, I put together some suggestions to help who just finished a contest and now wants submit his log." Great job, Paolo! That being
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00129.html (7,009 bytes)

291. Re: [RTTY] Answering QSL's (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 05:34:23 -0500
Tom Osborne wrote: "Most of the time I just get aout a card, look at his, fill it out from his info and send it. Wonder if that is what most of you do, or do you go ahead and bring up the log and che
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00145.html (6,994 bytes)

292. [RTTY] [3830] BARTG K4WW SOSB/40 HP (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:56:50 -0500
Lots of "one way" propagation. BARTG Spring RTTY Contest Call: K4WW Operator(s): K4WW Station: K4WW Class: SOSB/40 HP QTH: KY Operating Time (hrs): 5 Summary: Band QSOs Countries Call Areas -- 80: 40
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00243.html (6,900 bytes)

293. Re: [RTTY] working split (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:45:47 -0500
K C Selvadurai asked: "Please may I inquire whether it is acceptable practice to work split when facing a pile up in a RTTY Contest? The split could be just 1 or 2 kHz up" I've never had the fortune,
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00314.html (6,762 bytes)

294. [RTTY] Dayton RTTY Forum (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:21:20 -0500
No need to choose which forum to attend, as there are no other "conflicting" , contesting/DX, forums scheduled, in this time slot! This is your chance to learn, from some of the best, everything you
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00322.html (8,280 bytes)

295. Re: [RTTY] EA RTTY Test Question (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:35:48 -0500
Thomas Giella KN4LF wrote: "I also notice that there is no mention of required rest periods in the EA test, so I presume that there aren't any. I think that the required rest period stuff is a bunch
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00335.html (6,867 bytes)

296. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] Dayton (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:29:09 -0500
The RTTY forum will have two excellent speakers, and I will be sending all the final details, on/about April 20. C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW will see up to DX, no ____________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00344.html (8,118 bytes)

297. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP EA RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 14:10:27 -0400
Phil Cooper wrote: "Spent ages trying to work P29VAD, which would have been a new one for me" Any P29 would also be a new one for me, but I can find not information about P29VAD, in any of the callsi
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00021.html (7,115 bytes)

298. Re: [RTTY] 5Band WAS for RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:48:55 -0400
Dick Kriss wrote: "I was not aware that the ARRL offered a 5BWAS with a RTTY endorsement?" Same here. IMHO, 5BWAS RTTY would be just for the operator/station, and not endorsable, by ARRL? C'Ya, Shelb
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00177.html (6,492 bytes)

299. [RTTY] Dayton RTTY Forum (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:24:04 -0400
No need to choose which forum to attend, as there are no other "conflicting", contesting/DX, forums scheduled, at this time! This is your chance to learn, from some of the best, everything you always
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-05/msg00075.html (7,917 bytes)

300. Re: [RTTY] Dayton Presentation: P49X - 2006 ARRL RTTY Round-Up (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 19:39:40 -0400
w0yk@msn.com wrote: "Despite being the last forum of the convention (mid-morning Sunday as many people were heading home), the RTTY forum had about 50 participants." As moderator, I was elated beyond
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-05/msg00148.html (7,896 bytes)

Current List: 281 - 300
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu