Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ww@arrl.net: 527 ]

Total 527 documents matching your query.

381. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:18:40 -0400
"Please, please, if I call you, work me because you are not in my log." Please, please....why is this, or something similar, posted after most every contest? I suspect that 99.9% of the subscribers,
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00177.html (8,304 bytes)

382. [RTTY] C9 on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:27:32 -0400
Wayne, W5KDJ, will be there over two weekends Nov 29-Dec 10. He only plans CW, but when I queried him about RTTY: "If I get more request for it I might give it a try" Not sure how high on the "most w
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00002.html (6,387 bytes)

383. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC via LoTW - New Web Page - take a look! (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:17:06 -0400
With lots of help, from AD1C, I've now added my LoTW total. Very small percentage of LoTW confirmations, 76 of 313 actually confirmed. C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW ____________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00039.html (8,208 bytes)

384. Re: [RTTY] N8S (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 04:55:45 -0400
Bill Turner wrote: "Interesting. I have 18 LoTW confirmations for N8S." Other than Swains Island, there are four (4) other N8S, special event, callsigns listed: N8S July 10, 2006 July 20, 2006 U.S.S.
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00085.html (7,202 bytes)

385. Re: [RTTY] N8S Swain'S Island QSL (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 05:02:30 -0400
Richard Kriss asked: "My SA$E was sent but so for no QSL. Sounds like some are being delivered." If you're waiting for N8S, to do a DXCC submission, do as I did: "make your submission, N8S will arriv
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00086.html (7,748 bytes)

386. [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:00:55 -0400
Just thought those that don't subscribe to the contesting reflector, would find this interesting reading? Has someone, other that the "ignored" majority of contesters, finally understood what has bee
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00111.html (9,769 bytes)

387. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 07:04:48 -0400
KI5XP wrote: "The SO2R guys aren't going to agree with the non-SO2R guys, period. End of story." I know that "senility sets in at any age", but I don't recall anyone asking for an agreement? There ar
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00123.html (7,830 bytes)

388. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:35:31 -0400
Kok Chen wrote: "Since people are so opposed to an SO2R category, perhaps what should be created instead is an SO1R category, eh?" Again, and again...you have it wrong!!!!! I don't know of anyone tha
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00140.html (7,403 bytes)

389. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:19:31 -0400
Ron K5DJ wrote: "If you did create an SO1R category, it wouldn't take five minutes to make an external receiver work with the band map. Click on the new mult and bang you have a new mult." There is t
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00143.html (8,457 bytes)

390. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:34:21 -0400
W6WRT wrote: "There are not many "firsts" left in ham radio" I agree, however, I don't care to be the "first" to incur the wrath of the "regular" 160 meter enthusiasts. Most of them have spent untold
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00381.html (8,945 bytes)

391. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 06:03:11 -0400
Tom Osborne asked: "Why would they schedule this the same time as the Makrothen RTTY contest?" Another example of simultaneous contest's, using different rules? Why couldn't LoTW contest have used th
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00147.html (7,056 bytes)

392. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:47:54 -0400
Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: "You know I can't let this pass." Me neither...................NOT :>)))))))))))))))))))))) C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing li
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00201.html (6,864 bytes)

393. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:57:18 -0400
VE2FK wrote: "If we could only broadcast that so that all RTTY opr. got it." Why is it that we "go through this after most every RTTY contest"? Most every post, to this reflector, on any subject rega
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00424.html (8,662 bytes)

394. Re: [RTTY] JARTS log data (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:02:06 -0400
Phil Cooper wrote: "Guess we are just getting to be a bunch of boring old F^%%$S!!!" I prefer COP = Certified Ole Pharts C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY maili
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00478.html (6,394 bytes)

395. [RTTY] NAQP RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 04:32:44 -0500
Thanks to Don, the July 2007 NAQP RTTY results, along with updated NAQP State/Province records, have been posted. http://rttycontesting.com/results/naqprtty072007final.txt http://www.rttycontesting.c
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-11/msg00150.html (6,442 bytes)

396. [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:23:34 -0500
For those of you that don't subscribe to the contesting reflector! Although I'm not really sure, but I think I have heard this "concern", voiced before? :>) C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW -- Original Message --
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-11/msg00207.html (9,342 bytes)

397. Re: [RTTY] FJ RTTY Spots? (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:43:51 -0500
"who's going to be the first RTTY operator from new entity FJ?" Unless some of the "locals" have RTTY capabilities, sound like a nice trip, for someone, during RU? Happy Holidays, to all C'Ya, Shelby
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00159.html (7,339 bytes)

398. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] ARRL RTTY Round-Up Practice Sessions (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:37:58 -0500
"For once we had a reflector thread that was uncontroversial and unanimous!" But it's only the first day of the year. :))))) Happy New Year to all C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW ________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00004.html (6,956 bytes)

399. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup AA5VU Single Op HP (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:10:01 -0500
Dick Kriss wrote: "Missed two states (DC and VT)." Even though DC is not a state, but a multiplier, and other than 4U1WB, I'm not sure that I've ever worked a DC station, on RTTY? I also missed the D
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00057.html (7,105 bytes)

400. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 05:51:29 -0500
Guys/Gals...thanks for being on RTTY, and rather than being "part of the problem", I will offer some suggestions. 1) Visit http://rttycontesting.com/tutorials/tutorials.htm although it's directed to
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00089.html (9,418 bytes)

Current List: 381 - 400
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu