Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k5am@zianet.com: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] USB 2.0 external sound processor (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:06:53 +0000
Dave, The Phillips looks like it is geared for multiple speakers, which may not be what we need. With my Toshiba laptop and XP pro, I have had good results with the external Soundblaster USB MP3+ par
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00009.html (7,691 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] 6 meter RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:30:21 +0000
Yes, since 1964. See QST, February 1965, p.77, for Sam Harris's report on early 6 meter RTTY meteor scatter work. The 6 meter RTTY work is now at 50.180 - 50.190. 73, Mark, K5AM Homebrew station: www
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00050.html (6,907 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] 6 meter RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:12:03 +0000
Ham tradition is for RTTY at 80 kHz above the low end. This is not legal on 6M, so 50.180 seems reasonable. PSK operation near 50.260 is often low-power, with wide-bandwidth reception of many low-pow
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00055.html (7,892 bytes)

4. [RTTY] 6 meter sub band for RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 19:28:23 +0000
I have been on 6 meter RTTY since 1964. See QST, February 1965, p.77, for Sam Harris's report on early 6 meter RTTY meteor scatter work. Ham tradition is for RTTY at 80 kHz above the low end. This is
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00093.html (7,332 bytes)

5. [RTTY] 6 meter RTTY calling frequency at 50.180 (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 21:12:30 +0000
Thank you for the info, Gary! Well, JT65 might be considered a form of RTTY. Both are narrow-band, and 10 kHz can accomodate quite a few stations. I am thinking mainly of an E-skip opening, and that
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00094.html (8,017 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on Six Meters (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:24:41 +0000
The segment RTTY 50.180 to 50.190 is the reasonable choice. I have been on 6 meter RTTY since 1964. See QST, February 1965, p.77, for Sam Harris's report on early 6 meter RTTY meteor scatter work. Ha
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00004.html (8,152 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] 6 Meter RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:01:04 +0000
50.180 73, Mark, K5AM -- Mark Mandelkern Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA DM62ni k5am@zianet.com First callsign: W9ECV, Milwaukee, 1948. 10 band DXCC confirmed. 137 countries on 6 meters. Homebrew station
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-06/msg00007.html (7,139 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] 6 Meter RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:15:24 +0000
The segment RTTY 50.180 to 50.185 is the reasonable choice. I have been on 6 meter RTTY since 1964. See QST, February 1965, p.77, for Sam Harris's report on early 6 meter RTTY meteor scatter work. Ha
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-06/msg00008.html (8,052 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 6M ? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:37:34 +0000
RTTY: 50.180 Please observe the DX-only window below 50.125. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-06/msg00144.html (6,491 bytes)

10. [RTTY] Six meter RTTY on 50.180 (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:40:25 +0000
Although ham tradition is for RTTY at 80 kHz above the low end, this is not legal on 6M, so 50.180 seems a reasonable alternative. Other digital work near 50.300 is often low-power, with wide-bandwid
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00187.html (8,194 bytes)

11. [RTTY] 6 Meter RTTY is on 50.180 (score: 1)
Author: Mark K5AM <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 23:14:56 +0000
The segment RTTY 50.180 to 50.185 is the reasonable choice. I have been on 6 meter RTTY since 1964. See QST, February 1965, p.77, for Sam Harris's report on early 6 meter RTTY meteor scatter work. Ha
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-06/msg00018.html (9,038 bytes)

12. [RTTY] NS RY-Sprint K5AM (score: 1)
Author: Mark K5AM <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:36:41 +0000
K5AM NS Sprint RTTY . . . 2012 April 13 20 10 8 40 12 9 80 3 3 25 20 500 Tribander and wires. Lots of fun! As always (when at home), used the homebrew radio: http://www.zianet.com/k5am/radio.html The
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00084.html (7,313 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:44:28 +0000
After QSO 598, I enter it again as a dupe, nr 599. Then the next station gets nr 600 from me. 73, Mark, K5AM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00092.html (8,402 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu