Mail Archive Search: <+from:k8vt@ameritech.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k8vt@ameritech.net: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] CO8ZZ (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 15:26:48 -0500; He is sending his (your) serial number, the exchange. It is in alpha because he is inadvertently using "unshift on space". The easy fix is to use the "Northwest rule"; that is look at the number keys; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00050.html (7,740 bytes)
2. [RTTY] North Dakota RTTY sked (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 18:00:44 -0400; Is any one out there in North Dakota and able to make a brief sked on RTTY? I'm operational on 80-10 and have recently retired so any time, any band would be fine... I would like to get an ND RTTY QS; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00035.html (6,833 bytes)
3. [RTTY] TTY Machine BSPs (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 13:57:33 -0400; Anyone out there still using/collecting mechanical TTY machines? While cleaning out the attic at my parent's house, I made a rare find; a pile of AT&T Bell System Practices relating to mechanical TTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-04/msg00087.html (7,218 bytes)
4. [RTTY] XR0X IN BARTG TEST??????????? (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:04:50 -0500; Yes, I worked him... 73/Carter/K8VT; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00183.html (7,108 bytes)
5. [RTTY] keyed AFSK? - was: Best RTTY rig? (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 07:17:51 -0500; Well, even though I didn't originate the original post, let me try and explain... Your TNC (or whatever type of rtty modem you use), can output TWO types of transmit signal towards the radio: a DC vo; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00259.html (10,056 bytes)
6. [RTTY] keyed AFSK? - was: Best RTTY rig? (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 17:43:46 -0500; Bill, That is EXACTLY the point and why the purists prefer "true" FSK. True FSK will not give you the "unwanted sidebands" and bogus signals all up and down the band you refer to above. If you do hea; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00274.html (8,475 bytes)
7. [RTTY] VP6DI (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 20:26:17 -0500; It's a little scary the way this "frill" thing is being bandied about. 1. It has been pointed out that "frill" was said by ONE pilot station, not the crew on the island. 2. The original STATED PURPOS; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00358.html (7,973 bytes)
8. [RTTY] SO5R?? Does it matter? (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:31:11 -0500; Phil, I have to disagree with you on this. First of all, there is winning and there is winning. If I have a dipole and go from one radio to two radios, will I beat the big boys? Obviously not. But th; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00391.html (8,407 bytes)
9. [RTTY] CQWPX WX4TM SOABHP (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 07:24:52 -0500; AMEN!!!!!; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00218.html (6,490 bytes)
10. [RTTY] ARRL CW-contest and 80m activity (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 07:56:23 -0500; A possible explanation could be the propagation condition known as "multipath" which can be prevalent on 80. Our CW decoder (the brain) is quite immune to multipath and we can usually copy the CW jus; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00290.html (7,287 bytes)
11. [RTTY] OT: XFlare arrival time (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:58:46 -0400; Which is why they say to be alert for auroral activity Sunday or Monday night... 73/Carter/K8VT; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-08/msg00275.html (6,965 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:04:45 -0500; Waldemar DK3VN wrote: Don Hill AA5AU wrote: ... Not that I really care that much but if the contest sponsor claims to have awards, they should honor their word and give the awards out in a timely man; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00176.html (8,801 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] 15 m propagation? (score: 1): Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 07:13:30 -0400; Kok Chen wrote: When odd things happen, I go here for K index: http://sec.noaa.gov/rt_plots/kp_3d.html and this one for Aurora (borealis that is; you need to click on a different page for KC4AAA) ova; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00040.html (7,942 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Huh? (score: 1): Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:47:32 -0400; Kok Chen wrote: I just worked a 8N1NSSAI/1 at 14090. I did a Google and it is not my imagination :-). Holloweeeeeennnnnnn. That's nuthin...I just worked 5U4GB on the Isle of Tung Sol... _____________; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00410.html (6,600 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth proposal (dup) (score: 1): Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:17:19 -0500; Intellectually, no, I can't blame them and intellectually do support them. However, from an *economic* point of view, I recall the PACTOR-2 modems running around $1000 (!), give or take. As an *amate; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00392.html (7,888 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] [Amps] DIN stands for....? (score: 1): Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:06:15 -0500; ...and that's the nice thing about standards: there are so many to choose from! ;-) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00315.html (8,190 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse... (score: 1): Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:33:14 -0400; Well, now that you ask, yes, it does matter. Although the rules will never be perfect or please everyone, it would be nice to at least attempt to make the playing field a little more level. Treating; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00150.html (8,726 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1): Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:58:02 -0400; Bill, Thanks for the very well written response above. First, fellow hams don't deserve insults and sarcasm for stating their opinions. Next, I do think AA5AU's quote of 40% advantage *is* significan; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00203.html (11,401 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1): Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:22:27 -0400; Joe..."liking" the guys who do SO2R is *NOT* the point. I like everybody (except when they resort to name calling and sarcasm). I think it is truly great that they [SO2R operators] have the knowledge; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00223.html (9,437 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1): Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:33:12 -0400; Which is a roundabout way of admitting that there *IS* an advantage for SO2R. Well, the academic (if not practical) answer to that question is that technology keeps changing. Because as you say, it w; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00242.html (11,119 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]