Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k8vt@ameritech.net: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Be Careful What You Ask For ... (score: 1)
Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:16:19 -0400
Hmmm, then what about those "evil" multi-ops or the "evil" High power folks? You don't seem to think it's a problem that they have their own categories. Hey, I know...maybe instead of some of us lobb
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00310.html (9,721 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:16:57 -0400
John, IMHO, what is *REALLY* sad is that the author of the letter you quote above considers that people stating (and discussing) their heartfelt, honest opinion is "whining"... "Forget open debate, M
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00312.html (10,288 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:56:36 -0400
I absolutely agree it's been going on for years. But that tells me that where there's smoke, there may be fire; which is to say, it seems to still be an active, valid, unresolved issue, not "whining"
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00335.html (9,618 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1)
Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:35:33 -0400
Chuck, Absolutely NO NEED TO APOLOGIZE! We should welcome other views and not be afraid to exercise our right of free speech. Der Fuhrer is not running this country (yet). (Besides, whether they were
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00387.html (8,276 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:17:44 -0400
...or perhaps not. I know about the beacons and was not in the contest, but I think you may be being a little harsh. Not everyone (as you seem to presume) is a DX'er or cares about propagation...and
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00132.html (7,645 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] 160m TARA RTTY Melee (score: 1)
Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:52:18 -0500
Good luck, Jim...but it sounds like you've never operated the 160 CW contest if you expect 1800 to 1810 to be open... :-) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00151.html (7,568 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] extfsk & omni6 (score: 1)
Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:36:49 -0500
Listen to yourself on a different receiver when sending. Is the signal shifting? i.e., does it sound like a RTTY signal? If so, you may be sending "upside down", thus accounting for the lack of respo
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00453.html (7,343 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] Bletchley Park (WWII Code Centre) Collosus code breakingevent (score: 1)
Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:17:25 -0400
Mr. Croteau, Thanks for the 'heads-up'. It sounds quite interesting! However, let me see if I've got this straight... All I have to do is: 1) Build and de-bug a "six tone" RTTY decoder (what ever tha
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00166.html (7,957 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] Tower Dogs TV program (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:40:10 -0400
You don't have to be crazy to have a job like this, but I'm sure it helps. Reminds me of when I first hired in to the phone company back in '68 and the Telco was in the CATV business. We had a tower
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-07/msg00125.html (8,212 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] Tower Dogs TV program (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:21:53 -0400
Don, You don't say what your belt is made of. However, if it's leather, there's quite a good chance that it's NOT in as good a shape as you think. You may want to give serious consideration to gettin
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-07/msg00131.html (7,771 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] 160 meters tonight (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:33:00 -0500
What? "on and off"? You're using 'make and break' keying instead of FSK? (Sorry...just a feeble attempt at RTTY humor). Happy Thanksgiving, everyone! _______________________________________________ R
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00210.html (7,094 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] 160 meters tonight (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:25:56 -0500
It was a subtle (and apparently very obscure) reference to the very first days of RTTY when make and break keying was used, before FSK became the standard. Sorry, if ya gotta explain it, it ain't fun
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00216.html (7,671 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] Topband: From CO8LY (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:39:41 -0500
Here is my question to and the response I just got from RF Parts: Eduardo, CO8LY, is looking for a couple of 2SC2290s or two 2SC3240s, which apparently are the finals in a Yaesu FT-747 transceiver. 1
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00073.html (9,114 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:42:17 -0500
As soon as you can explain why someone would go to all the trouble, economic expense and technical bother if there was no advantage. ;-) Carter K8VT _______________________________________________ RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00075.html (7,775 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] Funny you should mention..... (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:13:26 -0400
Well, I would respectfully beg to differ. The "signal that goes out over the air" can be relevant. If a modern radio -internally- uses 'AFSK', usually no problem. However, if someone is putting tones
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00187.html (8,183 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] Funny you should mention..... (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:51:17 -0400
OK, you guys are going waaaay back -- Model 26, anyone? <grin>. I jumped on the RTTY train during the Drake '4-line' era (with a homebrew ST-6). The T-4 series of transmitters had a conveniently moun
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00206.html (8,647 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] The Problem with AFSK ... (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:48:41 -0500
[snip] Let me go where angels fear to tread --and put on my asbestos suit -- before I put in my 2 cents worth... 1) AFIK, there are two types of "FSK": a) FSK that is generated internal to the rig w
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00236.html (9,916 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] Is anyone still using WF1B for RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:43:47 -0500
If you are still using the WF1B program, please contact me off-reflector. If I don't hear from anyone, I will drop support for this file. Thanks & 73 - Jim AD1C Wow, talk about a blast from the past!
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00315.html (7,735 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] What is this auto mode that QRM's me? (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 19:18:14 -0400
I don't want to start an ARRL rant thread but when I came to understand this I dropped my ARRL membership. Yes I know about the argument that you can't change how the ARRL operates if you are not a m
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00351.html (9,818 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] Flex 6300 in low power RTTY contests; Maestro (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 21:40:16 -0400
Maybe instead of saying "No xcvr", maybe you should have said "some xcvrs". I always ran my TT Omni VI at full power in many RTTY contests with no problem. I even called TenTec and asked if I needed
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-06/msg00017.html (8,892 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu