Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:keepwalking188@yahoo.com: 176 ]

Total 176 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] Disturbing Observations (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:25:45 +0900
Don, It's human nature to push things and it's only the social pressure that keeps our animal side in check. After looking at some of the IARU HQ discussions, wow, what nonsense. After all, what's a
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00164.html (10,773 bytes)

42. Re: [RTTY] SARTG (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:14:09 -0500
Greg, EVERYONE had to make the first two before they made the rest. Congratulations on taking the steps to make the first two. Most guys don't take even this step. You have another chance to see some
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00050.html (8,254 bytes)

43. [RTTY] AC0C SARTG AUG-2010 3830 comments (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:43:49 -0500
Call: AC0C Operator(s): AC0C Station: AC0C Class: SOAB HP QTH: Kansas Operating Time (hrs): 18 Summary: Band QSOs Pts Mults -- 80: 0 0 0 40: 126 1325 36 20: 148 1665 44 15: 0 0 0 10: 0 0 0 -- Total:
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00055.html (7,840 bytes)

44. Re: [RTTY] SCC contest bands bad (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:20:51 -0500
I worked David, and today, that counts as DX! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00131.html (10,333 bytes)

45. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY SO1R time limit? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:48:02 -0500
Is there a 30 hour limit for this contest? I did not see it in the rules just now but my wife swears I'm blind in my older age... 73, Jeff ACØC www.ac0c.com __________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00091.html (6,356 bytes)

46. [RTTY] AC0C - CQ WW RTTY SOAB HP (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:59:03 -0500
CQ Worldwide DX Contest, RTTY Call: AC0C Class: SOAB HP QTH: Kansas Equipment: Yaesu FT-2000 with NS roofing filter Alpha 76pa 19-element stealth antenna array N1MM logger Summary: Band QSOs Pts Stat
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00001.html (9,989 bytes)

47. Re: [RTTY] Post Roundup comments (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:43:56 -0600
David, Agree with you on all counts. And thanks for the Qs The thing that drove me nuts was guys failing to put spaces around their call signs and sent them only one time. With the decoder sensitivit
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00206.html (9,312 bytes)

48. Re: [RTTY] After the Contest, AMP REPAIRS?? Interface Choices?? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:47:02 -0600
I think Joel is right here. Some of the stuff coming out of these eastern European/West Asian countries is really top drawer. I have a microprocessor development board that came from Slovakia and is
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00223.html (14,753 bytes)

49. Re: [RTTY] Post Roundup comments (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:40:47 -0600
RTTY contesting is growing like crazy. And with the sunspot cycle picking up (at it's snail's pace), tight bands are going to be the constant environment going forward... The rig's filtering is commo
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00277.html (11,519 bytes)

50. [RTTY] RTTY Roundup AC0C Single Op HP (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:42:30 -0600
ARRL RTTY Roundup Call: AC0C Operator(s): AC0C Station: AC0C Class: Single Op HP QTH: Kansas Operating Time (hrs): 24 Summary: Band QSOs -- 80: 134 40: 427 20: 389 15: 72 10: 0 -- Total: 1022 State/P
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00299.html (9,079 bytes)

51. Re: [RTTY] software (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:26:03 -0600
Chen, What a great idea. You are the master! 73, Jeff ACØC www.ac0c.com I had an interesting thought over this Roundup weekend. cocoaModem has an option in its contest interface to convert all CR/LF
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00456.html (11,132 bytes)

52. Re: [RTTY] 559 instead of 599 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:31:33 -0600
I saw one kind intentioned individual asking for a resend of the RST - I guess the SEC was copied OK. Now most guys I am guessing would use human assistance to get the interpretation. But I guess thi
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00457.html (8,758 bytes)

53. Re: [RTTY] Best MMTTY profile for noise and weak signals? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:58:04 -0600
Guys, The tuning sensitivity comes down to two factors. First, the 512 refers to the number of "taps" the program uses in its' digital filtering process. Just consider a higher number as equating to
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00543.html (11,468 bytes)

54. Re: [RTTY] Best MMTTY profile for noise and weak signals? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:24:44 -0600
Dave, What did you find as the "sweet spot" for the FW setting? 73, Jeff ACØC www.ac0c.com --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Jeff
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00547.html (9,810 bytes)

55. Re: [RTTY] Yaesu RTTY power (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 01:23:47 -0600
The FT2K is a nice rig on PSK. It's virtually impossible to make a wide signal with it. Very insensitive to the ALC setting. And it's as clean (32db or better) at full output and half output. For the
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00590.html (8,819 bytes)

56. Re: [RTTY] DOS computer for improved RTTY reception? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:14:32 -0600
Chen, The display on the MMTTY is good by 2000 standards, but not at all in the 2011 era where PowerSDR and DM780 waterfalls dominate the eye-candy space. One other problem with MMTTY - the spectrum
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00670.html (12,202 bytes)

57. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:02:00 -0600
Your capability to push out a strong signal should be a factor in this discussion... If you are in S&P, using a G5RV at 20' and 100W on 80m, then it will probably pay strong returns to use a longer r
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00727.html (13,454 bytes)

58. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:20:10 -0600
Delbert, Forget about the power adjustment. That's 3db and QSB is almost always going to be more than that. Better you run the full 100w and give the guy on the other end some help with a bit better
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00734.html (11,664 bytes)

59. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [GreenKeys] lack of civility (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:40:04 -0600
What we have to do is to be well behaved in our discourse. While that kind of language ("damn number") may be allowed in the more relaxed FCC standards of the day, it's a long way from gentlemanly co
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00077.html (10,660 bytes)

60. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [GreenKeys] lack of civility (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:46:32 -0600
Kevin, It's a compromise between maintaining a Q rate - after all, the point of the contest is competition and educating the uninformed is not a primary objective. Ignoring the guy is certainly more
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00081.html (10,163 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu