Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:keepwalking188@yahoo.com: 176 ]

Total 176 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] What should I expect from 3db improvement in SNR? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:00:22 -0600
Don't bet on the "cheaper" as a given. That depends in a HUGE way on the quality of your junk box and the amount of time you have to dedicate to the project. I think Bill spent 10 years on his so I w
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00277.html (11,299 bytes)

62. [RTTY] RTTY SO2V using Yaesu + Microham interface (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:29:25 -0600
If you are running SO2V using the Yaesu 1K/2K/5K with a Microham interface (MKII or DK2) , and would let me ask a few questions about your experience, please email me separately. Many thanks! 73, Jef
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00295.html (6,742 bytes)

63. Re: [RTTY] Fw: Farewell from K1TTT (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:36:58 -0600
Gentlemen, The take on this comment is incorrect, in my thinking. I don't view this as a negative on the realtime scoring system (which is a lot of fun) per se. Rather, it seems a telling reflection
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00299.html (14,447 bytes)

64. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:23:06 -0600
Run stations, IF you put the S&P call in the TU line, please put the TU first, not the call... Meaning (from David's example below - and assuming the run station is N9LAH): BAD: xxxx TU N9LAH CQ GOOD
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00411.html (11,651 bytes)

65. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:52:03 -0600
Phil, You are right about the chance of confusion. Same for the guys having CQ as part of their call sign. It depends on your objective. If it's to get your Q rate kicked up, then make the adjustment
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00419.html (10,653 bytes)

66. Re: [RTTY] 30M commercial RTTY station (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:24:57 +0800
I love that RTTY station. It's like a beacon that tells you if 30m is open to EU from the US! 73, Jeff ACØC www.ac0c.com If you want to read it in English (or just about any other language), just cop
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00092.html (9,170 bytes)

67. Re: [RTTY] Length-of-Exchange utility (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:02:32 -0500
Excellent work David. Very cool app... 73, Jeff ACØC www.ac0c.com I ran that and after careful analysis I realized that if I keep my serial numbers below 10 i.e. w1xx 599 10 w9ol cq I will be much fa
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00372.html (10,416 bytes)

68. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Software (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 21:25:28 -0500
Louis, Look through the messages on this board. You will see this topic debated a lot of times. All the answers and points of view are right here. 73, Jeff ACØC www.ac0c.com I am still getting my rad
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-05/msg00141.html (7,631 bytes)

69. Re: [RTTY] PC components suitable for radio room use? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:36:49 -0500
The most critical items in my experience seems to be the LCD and the PC power supply. Some help is to be had on the if the FCC B listing is shown on the power supply. Sticking to the serious name bra
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00082.html (9,834 bytes)

70. Re: [RTTY] Self spotting question (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:16:58 -0500
Jim, Government regulation is a poor for personal responsibility and education. By that same logic, SSB should be disallowed because of the same potential and only CW allowed. 73, Jeff ACØC www.ac0c.
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00068.html (12,439 bytes)

71. Re: [RTTY] Self spotting outside of a contest? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:53:56 -0500
I find this issue about the same as the power vs. QRP or assisted vs. unassisted in contesting. What I mean by that is there is no clear "right" or "wrong" here. It, in my thinking, comes back to per
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00104.html (12,141 bytes)

72. [RTTY] so2r controller choice (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:28:24 -0500
Guys, I wanted to find out what kind of so2r controllers you have chosen. Im at the cross roads myself and this seemingly simple choice has become more complicated than I guess it probably should be.
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00113.html (7,673 bytes)

73. [RTTY] NAQP RTTY AC0C Single Op LP (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:39:50 -0500
North American QSO Party, RTTY - July Call: AC0C Operator(s): AC0C Station: AC0C Class: Single Op LP QTH: Kansas Operating Time (hrs): 9:45 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 80: 42 22 40: 239 46 20: 237 37
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00173.html (9,036 bytes)

74. Re: [RTTY] Question? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:17:31 -0500
Chen, I have noticed the similar thing a couple of years back and eventually found that my sound card for the TX side was slightly off vs. the RX side when the PC is really loaded (get warmer). I can
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00177.html (8,930 bytes)

75. Re: [RTTY] Digital DXCC or ARRL Board of Directors, respectfully: have my strong disagreement (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:47:35 -0500
I agree. This is a mistake. RTTY is a fundamental and historical mode. CW, SSB, RTTY. Dropping it in favor of a generic Digital tag does not provide proper respect for a core mode. I can see somethin
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00022.html (12,259 bytes)

76. Re: [RTTY] Digital DXCC or ARRL Board of Directors, respectfully: have my strong disagreement (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 21:45:46 -0500
Chen, The issue to me is not about category. It's about tradition. Dropping RTTY in favor of a broader category of digital may be logical. But it's not showing proper respect for the 3rd leg of a gra
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00043.html (11,734 bytes)

77. [RTTY] CW RTTY DX - SO time limit? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 22:33:18 -0500
Is there a (max) op-hours time limit for CW RTTY DX Sept/24? I did not see one in the rules. Want to double check my reading. 73, Jeff ACØC www.ac0c.com ______________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00103.html (6,707 bytes)

78. Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:07:50 -0500
Jim, You are so very right. On both counts. Especially the lids... The urination contests occurring between the over zealous dx police, naive rookies who seem to have no idea of how to properly work
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00171.html (12,388 bytes)

79. Re: [RTTY] Key down & 50% power (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:19:30 -0500
Phil's comments about this recommendation being rig specific is right on the money. That kind of general blanket statement is very misleading, in the same way the PSK setting guidelines of no ALC = q
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00328.html (9,049 bytes)

80. Re: [RTTY] AA5AU Contest Notes on 2011 CQWW RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 12:27:14 -0500
A great read, Don. 73, Jeff ACØC www.ac0c.com In case you're interested... http://rttycontesting.com/contestnotes/2011_cqww.htm 73, Don AA5AU http://www.aa5au.com http://www.rttycontesting.com ______
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00018.html (8,005 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu