Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

21. [RTTY] New Propagation Email Reflector (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:55:42 -0400
Thanks to the efforts of Jim Reisert AD1C, I'm moderator of a new propagation reflector that has been created on www.contesting.com The web page to sign up for the new mailing list is at: http://list
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00069.html (7,773 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] Is AM Radio Harmful? (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:48:34 -0400
I strongly doubt that non ionizing RF radiation below microwave frequencies poses an increased danger for cancer, especially at HF frequencies and lower. Now cellphone frequencies at 900 mc I think i
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00156.html (11,366 bytes)

23. [RTTY] Transmit Technical Problems (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:14:50 -0400
There is a dearth of information on websites, e-lists and e-groups concerning the proper methods to use to ensure a clean signal on any digital mode via AFSK. So it amazes me to see so many that stil
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00267.html (11,107 bytes)

24. [RTTY] Re: Mark V RTTY Power Levels (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:01:30 -0400
I have the Mark V Field and run 100 watts regularly on long RTTY QSO's using AFSK. Actually I can run the output up to 125 watts before I get any ALC action. With 100 watts and no ALC indication I ge
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00296.html (9,825 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Petition (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:35:03 -0400
There is probably no mention of a proposed segregation by bandwith on 160 meters by the ARRL, because of their involvement in the recent mini war on 160 meters over separation by mode. I guess they c
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00317.html (11,286 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Petition (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:40:47 -0400
Howard your assumption is correct. Segregation on 160 meters by mode and bandwidth is not allowed. Realistically though I would not expect much PACTOR operation on 160 meters because of antenna size
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00391.html (10,559 bytes)

27. [RTTY] Re: 10 Meter RTTY Operation (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:22:15 -0400
For those that enjoy 10 meter operation there is a worldwide radiowave propagation beacon network that operates on 28128 kc. You can read about the network at: http://w2ev.rochesterny.org/PropNET . Y
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00174.html (8,420 bytes)

28. [RTTY] Contesting.com Propagation Reflector (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:46:12 -0400
Participation on my Propagation Reflector at: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/propagation has been pretty slow since it's inception. Basically it's been a one man show so far, me! As I s
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00195.html (8,940 bytes)

29. [RTTY] FL RTTY Contest Entry (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:01:05 -0400
No weekend RTTY contesting was possible here in the Tampa Bay area of west central Florida due to Hurricane Jeanne. I lost all of my antennas, supporting masts and trees. I feel lucky to have my roof
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00258.html (7,928 bytes)

30. [RTTY] Outboard DSP Filters (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:53:09 -0400
I find that the 250 hz DSP data filter works real well on my V Field for RTTY. On my FT-840 which is used primarily for PSK31 I use the Timewave DSP-9+ and it also works very well. Post Hurricane Jea
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00042.html (7,804 bytes)

31. [RTTY] Sad Comment On Operator Age (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:47:39 -0400
I was thinking the same thing when I was operating the JARTS contest. I'm 47 almost 48 years old and I saw very few operators younger then me. Only one U.S. operator and a few DX stations. I worked L
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00225.html (7,282 bytes)

32. [RTTY] Earlier Solar Minimum (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:02:03 -0400
Virtually all forecasts of solar maximum and minimum are incorrect. The average sunspot cycle is 11 years but it varies from 9 to 14 years and we still do not know why. So this variation ruins the be
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00299.html (7,919 bytes)

33. [RTTY] KN4LF Daily HF/MF Radio Propagation Outlook (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:45:31 -0500
For a good number of years I produced the KN4LF Daily HF/MF Radio Propagation Outlook. I stopped earlier this year due to personal health reasons. I'm considering producing it again beginning on Wedn
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00162.html (19,942 bytes)

34. [RTTY] KN4LF Daily HF/LF/MF RX Prop Outlook #2004-005 (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:56:16 -0500
Just an FYI the "KN4LF Daily HF/LF/MF Radio Propagation Outlook #2004-005" has been published. It can be accessed at http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/propagation http://www.eham.net under "News" htt
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00013.html (9,220 bytes)

35. [RTTY] 160 RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 21:38:05 -0500
Larry W0ETC Said: Last PM after checking email I decided to listen around 1808 for RTTY signals. Much to my surprise N2WK was calling CQ. I answered and we had a brief QSO. Wayne was an honest S7 whi
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00269.html (9,990 bytes)

36. [RTTY] 160 RTTY Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:06:21 -0500
Floyd et all, Yes I also see wide AFSK RTTY and PSK31 signals on the HF bands. When I politely mention same to the offending parties the response is usually hostile or indifferent at best. But I don'
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00279.html (10,794 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] 160 RTTY Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 10:39:31 -0500
Floyd et all, Happy New Year 2005 to all! Whether we are talking "regions" or countries/entities the end result is the same, differing international band allocations. Yes I propose an international R
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00002.html (12,463 bytes)

38. [RTTY] 160 Meter RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 11:06:45 -0500
I forgot to mention in my last post that I called CQ RTTY on 1810 kc between 0400-0500 UTC Friday to no avail. Also once again between 0100-0200 and 0400-0500 UTC Saturday once again to no avail. I d
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00004.html (7,830 bytes)

39. [RTTY] Topband Reflector (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 12:15:15 -0500
Jim N7US Said: Why not float these ideas for a 160 RTTY contest on the Topband reflector? Thomas KN4LF Says: Jim I see that you posted the RTTY 160 contest thread on the Topband Reflector per your su
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00005.html (7,806 bytes)

40. [RTTY] Re: 160 RTTY Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:09:46 -0500
Floyd et all, I'm not formulating a plan of attack "so to speak" concerning my suggestions for RTTY contesting on 160 meters and therefore have no "hell bent agenda". Often times when someone accuses
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00013.html (16,244 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu