- 21. [RTTY] New Propagation Email Reflector (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:55:42 -0400
- Thanks to the efforts of Jim Reisert AD1C, I'm moderator of a new propagation reflector that has been created on www.contesting.com The web page to sign up for the new mailing list is at: http://list
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00069.html (7,773 bytes)
- 22. Re: [RTTY] Is AM Radio Harmful? (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:48:34 -0400
- I strongly doubt that non ionizing RF radiation below microwave frequencies poses an increased danger for cancer, especially at HF frequencies and lower. Now cellphone frequencies at 900 mc I think i
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00156.html (11,366 bytes)
- 23. [RTTY] Transmit Technical Problems (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:14:50 -0400
- There is a dearth of information on websites, e-lists and e-groups concerning the proper methods to use to ensure a clean signal on any digital mode via AFSK. So it amazes me to see so many that stil
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00267.html (11,107 bytes)
- 24. [RTTY] Re: Mark V RTTY Power Levels (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:01:30 -0400
- I have the Mark V Field and run 100 watts regularly on long RTTY QSO's using AFSK. Actually I can run the output up to 125 watts before I get any ALC action. With 100 watts and no ALC indication I ge
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00296.html (9,825 bytes)
- 25. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Petition (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:35:03 -0400
- There is probably no mention of a proposed segregation by bandwith on 160 meters by the ARRL, because of their involvement in the recent mini war on 160 meters over separation by mode. I guess they c
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00317.html (11,286 bytes)
- 26. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Petition (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:40:47 -0400
- Howard your assumption is correct. Segregation on 160 meters by mode and bandwidth is not allowed. Realistically though I would not expect much PACTOR operation on 160 meters because of antenna size
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00391.html (10,559 bytes)
- 27. [RTTY] Re: 10 Meter RTTY Operation (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:22:15 -0400
- For those that enjoy 10 meter operation there is a worldwide radiowave propagation beacon network that operates on 28128 kc. You can read about the network at: http://w2ev.rochesterny.org/PropNET . Y
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00174.html (8,420 bytes)
- 28. [RTTY] Contesting.com Propagation Reflector (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:46:12 -0400
- Participation on my Propagation Reflector at: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/propagation has been pretty slow since it's inception. Basically it's been a one man show so far, me! As I s
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00195.html (8,940 bytes)
- 29. [RTTY] FL RTTY Contest Entry (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:01:05 -0400
- No weekend RTTY contesting was possible here in the Tampa Bay area of west central Florida due to Hurricane Jeanne. I lost all of my antennas, supporting masts and trees. I feel lucky to have my roof
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00258.html (7,928 bytes)
- 30. [RTTY] Outboard DSP Filters (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:53:09 -0400
- I find that the 250 hz DSP data filter works real well on my V Field for RTTY. On my FT-840 which is used primarily for PSK31 I use the Timewave DSP-9+ and it also works very well. Post Hurricane Jea
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00042.html (7,804 bytes)
- 31. [RTTY] Sad Comment On Operator Age (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:47:39 -0400
- I was thinking the same thing when I was operating the JARTS contest. I'm 47 almost 48 years old and I saw very few operators younger then me. Only one U.S. operator and a few DX stations. I worked L
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00225.html (7,282 bytes)
- 32. [RTTY] Earlier Solar Minimum (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:02:03 -0400
- Virtually all forecasts of solar maximum and minimum are incorrect. The average sunspot cycle is 11 years but it varies from 9 to 14 years and we still do not know why. So this variation ruins the be
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00299.html (7,919 bytes)
- 33. [RTTY] KN4LF Daily HF/MF Radio Propagation Outlook (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:45:31 -0500
- For a good number of years I produced the KN4LF Daily HF/MF Radio Propagation Outlook. I stopped earlier this year due to personal health reasons. I'm considering producing it again beginning on Wedn
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00162.html (19,942 bytes)
- 34. [RTTY] KN4LF Daily HF/LF/MF RX Prop Outlook #2004-005 (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:56:16 -0500
- Just an FYI the "KN4LF Daily HF/LF/MF Radio Propagation Outlook #2004-005" has been published. It can be accessed at http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/propagation http://www.eham.net under "News" htt
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00013.html (9,220 bytes)
- 35. [RTTY] 160 RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 21:38:05 -0500
- Larry W0ETC Said: Last PM after checking email I decided to listen around 1808 for RTTY signals. Much to my surprise N2WK was calling CQ. I answered and we had a brief QSO. Wayne was an honest S7 whi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00269.html (9,990 bytes)
- 36. [RTTY] 160 RTTY Contesting (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:06:21 -0500
- Floyd et all, Yes I also see wide AFSK RTTY and PSK31 signals on the HF bands. When I politely mention same to the offending parties the response is usually hostile or indifferent at best. But I don'
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00279.html (10,794 bytes)
- 37. Re: [RTTY] 160 RTTY Contesting (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 10:39:31 -0500
- Floyd et all, Happy New Year 2005 to all! Whether we are talking "regions" or countries/entities the end result is the same, differing international band allocations. Yes I propose an international R
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00002.html (12,463 bytes)
- 38. [RTTY] 160 Meter RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 11:06:45 -0500
- I forgot to mention in my last post that I called CQ RTTY on 1810 kc between 0400-0500 UTC Friday to no avail. Also once again between 0100-0200 and 0400-0500 UTC Saturday once again to no avail. I d
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00004.html (7,830 bytes)
- 39. [RTTY] Topband Reflector (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 12:15:15 -0500
- Jim N7US Said: Why not float these ideas for a 160 RTTY contest on the Topband reflector? Thomas KN4LF Says: Jim I see that you posted the RTTY 160 contest thread on the Topband Reflector per your su
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00005.html (7,806 bytes)
- 40. [RTTY] Re: 160 RTTY Contesting (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:09:46 -0500
- Floyd et all, I'm not formulating a plan of attack "so to speak" concerning my suggestions for RTTY contesting on 160 meters and therefore have no "hell bent agenda". Often times when someone accuses
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00013.html (16,244 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu