Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lknain@nc.rr.com: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 21:50:32 -0500
There are some stations that seem to be guilty of these kinds of behavior every DXpedition for years (I don't recall the two mentioned earlier as being in that group however). You would think they wo
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00039.html (13,737 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:37:40 -0500
Take away the band DXCCs , leave only the Mixed DXCC, and get rid of Challenge and 5BDXCC and you reduce the scheme to a single QSO per entity. That's what you want isn't it? That ignores, of course,
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00051.html (14,293 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:49:32 -0500
It would seem to me that both the caller and DX are subject to being clobbered in the proposal. If I am up 2, the DX calls me up 2, there is no protection if someone else decides up 2 is a good place
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00111.html (14,194 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:02:42 -0500
RTTY and PSK have generally run a higher rate in both LoTW and eQSl for me as well. The overall rate seems to be going up as more people are using the system. LoTW had problems a year ago (or was it
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00177.html (9,015 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Software (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:42:19 -0400
I use N1MM and MMVARI (PSK) or MMTTY (RTTY) from XV and it works very well. 73, Larry W6NWS N1MM will do this with MMARVI. Mike W0MU On 4/11/2014 10:56 AM, Dennis wrote: I'm looking for some RTTY sof
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00063.html (9,218 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] Spaces at end of exchange (please) (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:03:37 -0400
While I agree with the space and do use it it does sometimes cause the loss of the start of the other station's sending if the other station is quick on the keys. 73, Larry W6NWS At least one space -
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00011.html (10,013 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] Point-and-click vs typing (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:23:15 -0400
I have run RTTY off and on since the 1960's. No point and click with a Model 15. FWIW, for me (hardly a hardcore RTTY contester), I almost never take my hand off the mouse for a RTTY contest or DXped
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00163.html (9,068 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/6 on 160 meter RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 05:30:27 -0400
At 0415Z Bill was maybe 25% print for me in NC with QSB on a low half sloper. 73, Larry W6NWS Bill, FWIW: There are plenty of stations calling you but you're not hearing/printing them. The 0400 UTC i
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00084.html (8,921 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/7 Nevada (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:38:29 -0400
Sort of a shame so little RTTY. The last couple of weeks have had a lot of RTTY and even some PSK. MI had RTTY starting the first night of operation for example. 73, Larry W6NWS hi all - Starting Sun
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00163.html (7,750 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] OT Computer Assistance (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:30:21 -0500
Phil, there are USB to parallel port adapters sold which could help with the printers. You can still get serial cards for computers if the USB to serial scheme doesn't work. I have used USB to serial
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00046.html (9,073 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] Lids running RTTY on the JT65 Frequency (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:03:08 -0500
FCC says I can transmit RTTY or data from 14.000 to 14.150 for example. Many countries make no such distinction. So what you are talking about is sort of Gentleman's agreement or convention. As usual
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00077.html (14,407 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] Lids running RTTY on the JT65 Frequency (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:17:02 -0500
During CQWW CW activity often extends to .130 (sometimes higher) on 20, 15, 10. But that doesn't seem to bother RTTY or digital stations. Too many times I have heard a station running on an "RTTY" fr
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00124.html (12,152 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] Contest QRMing of other digimodes (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 20:42:50 -0500
Just for grins I looked and the highest logged CW contest QSO I have is 28.189 (many above .100). I have about 2000 QSOs on 10M CW above 28.070 (over several years). A similar number on 20 and 15. I
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00147.html (10,966 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] WHY put CQ at the end? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:36:59 -0500
OTOH, I used WPX W6NWS and only got spotted if someone manually spotted it. I changed to WPX W6NWS CQ and began to show up by the skimmers. I would never use CQ as part of calling someone when I am d
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00086.html (9,731 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] WHY put CQ at the end? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:18 -0500
As with most things in ham radio there are people who hate things like skimmer spots and others that love them (I like them). I think most clusters offer a means to enable or disable skimmer spots. 7
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00103.html (11,671 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] E30FB rtty? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:34:23 -0400
The op did ask K7BV "Am I reverse" this afternoon. I didn't hear the response but the op made no change - still transmitting reverse and receiving normal. 73, Larry W6NWS Unfortunately, they are back
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00036.html (10,321 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] PO entroute to GE (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:31:35 -0400
Software licensing fees were done on computer mainframes in the 1960's. Microsoft has been doing it with Office and Adobe with Photoshop. Others are doing it as well. They are pushing that model for
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00145.html (11,085 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:23:06 -0400
I saw several cases where the leading and/or trailing character of a call sign got clipped. Perhaps the skimmer is seeing something like that. We have had the discussion many times about how to minim
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00002.html (12,668 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] W3YY (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:38:39 -0500
Google W3YY to find his website. His email address is on QRZ.com. 73 Mike K5TRI Anyone know how to get in touch with W3YY? Thanks and 73, Steve W0SZ _______________________________________________ RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-11/msg00003.html (7,805 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: Larry <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:28:09 -0500
"7040 is absolutly lowest on 40m for RTTY last 5 years!!" Not really. Many European stations as far down as 7.029. Some as far back in time as 2002 in my log. 73, Larry W6NWS I sit in HF commity of I
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00046.html (14,365 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu