Mail Archive Search: <+from:n3sl@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:n3sl@aol.com: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. [RTTY] Round-Up plaques (score: 1): Author: N3SL@aol.com; Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:16:30 EST; Are the plaques out for the 2003 Round Up? Just curious, as I've not received mine, and I don't ever recall it taking over a year to get one. 73, Steve _______________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00287.html (6,476 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] DXCC Questions (score: 1): Author: N3SL@aol.com; Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 08:08:25 -0500; Jerry, Years ago, an 8-lander (and I believe there's been more than one) used to handle 4U1UN, and he was 100%. Then came a period of essentially no QSLs from New York for a very long time. I've read; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00044.html (7,336 bytes)
23. [RTTY] Get out your checkbooks! (score: 1): Author: N3SL@aol.com; Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:32:41 EST; http://www.icom.co.jp/world/products/amateur/7800/index.htm _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00118.html (6,976 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] VU4NRO on RTTY - soon (score: 1): Author: N3SL@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 18:00:45 EST; At the risk of being shot/hung/burned at the stake: I think PSK is the better mode for them to be using. Their setup is less than optimum (power, antennas, experienced pile-up managers), all of which; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00215.html (9,394 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] YU6AO Rtty (score: 1): Author: N3SL@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:55:41 EDT; He's doing a good job at running the unruly mess. He's receiving inverted as well, so those transmitting normal won't make it. Your competition is less.... Good luck In a message dated 7/26/2006 4:33; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00501.html (6,891 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] Blacklisting over zealous callers (score: 1): Author: N3SL@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:08:19 EDT; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: abuse I could tolerate. == Well, I have, and I think this entire thread is from the wrong perspective. To bring a pile up to a complete halt in order to chastise a station is a tota; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00124.html (12,025 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] Blacklisting over zealous callers (score: 1): Author: N3SL@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:07:21 EDT; OK. No argument. Then "ego gorging" works.... :-) In a message dated 4/11/2007 8:59:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time, dezrat@copper.net writes: ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I thought the whole; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-04/msg00130.html (8,979 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] BS7H QSO? (score: 1): Author: n3sl@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:44:03 -0400; Interesting they made that many Qs with the near total lack of spots. Even a search of OH2AQ spot history only shows 3 real spots. The rest of the stuff is simply chatter.... --Original Message-- Fro; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-05/msg00065.html (7,661 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] IRC (International Reply Coupon) Questions (score: 1): Author: N3SL@aol.com; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:04:17 EDT; Andrei, Presuming you've received a current IRC (CN 01 - in top right corner), it is valid for a 90cent US stamp. You can use a US issued IRC to get a US stamp as well. As others have recommended, I'; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00303.html (8,135 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] I'm baaaack (and 7O1YGF RTTY QSO now on LOTW) (score: 1): Author: N3SL@aol.com; Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:47:11 EDT; It sounds exactly like this... _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzpcAOTuoAU_ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzpcAOTuoAU) In a message dated 8/21/2009 11:15:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time, jjreisert@al; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00080.html (7,881 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]