Mail Archive Search: <+from:n8hm@arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:n8hm@arrl.net: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Take Two RTTY Exchange (score: 1): Author: "Paul R. Stoetzer" <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:11:46 -0500; As I run QRP into a magnetic loop, I send my call and exchange three times and generally don't get too many requests for repeats. 73, Paul N8HM _______________________________________________ RTTY ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00165.html (10,927 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Sent Exchange (score: 1): Author: "Paul R. Stoetzer" <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:18:16 -0500; The Cabrillo file generated fine when I put 001 in there. 73, Paul N8HM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00170.html (6,894 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] More RTTY Contests Needed (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:33:27 -0400; I just worked the J52 with 100w and an MFJ-1786 mag loop on my balcony. 73, Paul N8HM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00233.html (10,630 bytes)
4. [RTTY] EA RTTY N8HM SOSB/20 LP (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:59:58 -0400; EA RTTY Contest Call: N8HM Operator(s): N8HM Station: N8HM Class: SOSB/20 LP QTH: Washington, DC Operating Time (hrs): 6 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 80: 40: 20: 48 40 15: 10: -- Total: 48 40 Total Sc; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00055.html (7,819 bytes)
5. [RTTY] NCCC RY-Sprint N8HM LP (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:10:44 -0400; NCCC RTTY Sprint - Apr 13 Call: N8HM Operator(s): N8HM Station: N8HM Class: Single Op LP QTH: Washington, DC Operating Time (hrs): .5 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 80: 40: 20: 5 5 -- Total: 5 5 Total S; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00081.html (7,187 bytes)
6. [RTTY] NCCC RY-Sprint N8HM LP (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:01:17 -0400; NCCC RTTY Sprint - Apr 20 Call: N8HM Operator(s): N8HM Station: N8HM Class: Single Op LP QTH: Washington, DC Operating Time (hrs): .5 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 160: 80: 40: 20: 3 3 15: 10: -- Total; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00137.html (7,295 bytes)
7. [RTTY] SPDX RTTY N8HM SOAB LP (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:56:44 -0400; SPDX RTTY Contest Call: N8HM Operator(s): N8HM Station: N8HM Class: SOAB LP QTH: Washington, DC Operating Time (hrs): 6 Summary: Band QSOs Pts Mults -- 80: 40: 20: 40 335 23 15: 10: -- Total: 40 335; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00183.html (6,732 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] HK0NA (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 15:19:46 -0400; There was an update this past week that the first mailings are going to go out late May. Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00013.html (7,633 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] ?? 7O6T (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 20:47:05 -0400; Have you checked 20m at 1:00am? 20m is often quite open that late between the vernal and autmunal equinoxes. 73, Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@cont; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00078.html (10,957 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] has everyone forgot the PJ party (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 21:24:06 -0400; The key difference being that we can all count on activity on all of the PJs on a consistent basis. Who knows when the next 7O will be! 73, Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00084.html (7,396 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] WAERTTY contest (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:33:32 -0400; It looks like the 2011 results haven't been posted yet. Only the claimed scores are posted for RTTY. 73, _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://l; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00286.html (7,760 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] FD RTTY Question (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:04:40 -0400; The PSK part of 20m was absolutely packed all weekend. I didn't make many Field Day contacts, but that appeared to be where the action is. PSK31 is an utterly unsuitable mode for contesting and it's; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00096.html (7,474 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:20:32 -0400; This ignores the delay at the end of transmissions, which is quite annoying, plus the problem of PSK31 operators adding superfluous information. PSK31 operators, even in PSK31 contests, rarely use as; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00105.html (13,509 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:56:05 -0400; RTTY can get pretty distorted at times too, but you are right that PSK does not survive polar paths well. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00110.html (8,433 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:43:24 -0400; Somebody should set up an ASCII contest. That would be interesting. Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00114.html (11,462 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:39:59 -0400; Anybody want to try ASCII? I've never made a QSO. I'm calling CQ at 14.088.5 MHz. Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00117.html (13,398 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:07:29 -0400; No answers yet. I'm still there. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00120.html (15,703 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:46:09 -0400; I sometimes feel like PSK operators are in their own little world. They stick to that watering hole around 070 and don't venture outside of it. I was operating a special event call earlier this year.; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00121.html (10,175 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] WPX on LOTW (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:17:58 -0400; I'm not sure this was supposed to be released. You have to manually select all of your credits before a couple of months ago. There's no way to attach your old call signs to your account. The applica; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-07/msg00005.html (10,032 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] WPX on LOTW (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:28:06 -0400; Haha. Yes, I added all mine manually, but that was easy with just 1,144 QSLs! I qualify for Mixed, Digital, Mixed NA Endorsement, and Digital NA endorsement...just need it to go live! _______________; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-07/msg00007.html (11,876 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]