Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n8hm@arrl.net: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] WPX on LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:57:00 -0400
For some reason, I only have an N8HM account. AB8HM and KC8NGY accounts didn't get created (those have a very small number of QSLs, though, being twelve years old), so I wasn't able to merge them int
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-07/msg00010.html (12,927 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] WPX on LoTW (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:35:29 -0400
Now announced by the ARRL. Still doesn't seem to work properly and can't seem to apply. http://www.arrl.org/news/view/arrl-launches-logbook-of-the-world-wpx-award-integration ________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-07/msg00014.html (8,324 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] WPX on LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 16:03:18 -0400
All QSOs made within the same DXCC entity, it's the same restriction as DXCC. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-07/msg00017.html (10,631 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] WPX on LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 16:10:30 -0400
Yes, the most recent update on the LoTW page explains that. There is still some data processing going on to apply all of your QSLs to your WPX account. It will take a couple of days for everything to
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-07/msg00019.html (12,315 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] used to be 10m WAS -- now WAS RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:53:46 -0500
NAQP? 73, Paul, N8HM Yes there are contests to aid in WAS in cw and on phone. My suggestion/thought was one designed for RTTY. 73, Eric k8ohz On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM, <mike@n1ta.com> wrote:
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-11/msg00049.html (10,212 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 121, Issue 11 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:21:32 -0500
K2PS was only on 10 meters (his only antenna). I was on 20 and up, but only for a limited time due to a cold. I use a magnetic loop on my balcony and have to deal with high noise levels. This was the
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00049.html (7,511 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] US call signs (BARTG) (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:25:59 -0500
My suggestion is to adopt the WAE rules. "For European stations every non-European DXCC entity counts as a multiplier. Exception: In the following countries up to ten numerical call areas count as mu
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00102.html (10,179 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] US call signs (BARTG) (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:53:19 -0500
All those contests use US Call Areas as mults, but they don't require stations to add their correct call area as a suffix. BARTG is unique in that outdated requirement. 73, Paul, N8HM Well, thanks fo
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00141.html (9,827 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] US call signs (BARTG) (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:56:56 -0500
In those other contests, I count as an 8th area mult even though, geographically, I'm in the 3rd call area. Indeed, you'll get credit for an 8th area mult working me in a BARTG contest too since I do
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00145.html (11,958 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] XE 2013 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:11:49 -0500
Next big one is BARTG? Perhaps you are forgetting CQ WPX next weekend... 73, Paul, N8HM On 2/3/2013 3:10 PM, Lee Roberts wrote: Kinda disappointing in the lack of participation by the Mexican station
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00026.html (10,687 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] WPX (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 07:08:04 -0500
You don't. 73, Paul, N8HM in Washington, DC (not N8HM/3) Ed W3NR Chickamauga, GA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00147.html (7,104 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] 2013 Roundup Results (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:07:24 -0400
If he logged him early, presumably the QSO would be marked invalid and not in the NIL list. It's likely the other guy logged K4WW early and thus the QSO was thrown out. 73, Paul, N8HM _______________
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00087.html (11,849 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] ARRL issues Official Reply: Re 2.8KHz HF digital BW (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:39:49 -0400
My opinion is that we should have the flexibility to do whatever we can do within a 2.8 kHz bandwidth (including multiple carrier modes, spread spectrum, etc.). I think voluntary band plans is good e
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00137.html (8,858 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Vision of the future (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:53:05 -0400
I'm pretty sick of this doom and gloom crap about necessary updates to our massively outdated regulations. 73, Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00076.html (9,310 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Question (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:50:28 -0400
I don't believe they are required to not consider comments that are not timely filed, but they are certainly under no obligation to consider them (as they are with comments that are timely filed). 73
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00310.html (7,363 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] Can't see your own posts? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 06:09:28 -0400
73, Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00060.html (8,078 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] Can't see your own posts? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 09:01:17 -0400
John, 1. Click on the drop down box next to the list name. 2. Click "Filter messages from this mailing list" 3. Click "Create filter with this search" 4. Check "Never send it to Spam" 5. Click "Creat
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00064.html (10,165 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: RE: ARRL W1AW Bulletin Operations (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 10:59:20 -0400
The wording of that section of the regulations might not explicitly override the other regulations against causing interference to other amateur stations but implicitly it must. The control operator
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00040.html (12,414 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: RE: ARRL W1AW Bulletin Operations (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:11:57 -0400
W1AW can operate as per it's published schedule and you can too If you can meet all the requirements. You must: 1. Be a club station that is paying the control operator for their services. 2. Make on
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00043.html (16,488 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: RE: ARRL W1AW Bulletin Operations (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:13:59 -0400
If you want to test it out, I suggest you operate on a W1AW bulletin frequency and keep a recorder going. When W1AW fires up on top of you, file a complaint with the FCC and send them your recording.
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00045.html (14,880 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu