Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:na4m@arrl.net: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Capable Amp (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:33:45 +0000
At 13:29 12/30/2003, Scott Nichols wrote: Are there other amps/tubes that better fit RTTY contesting ? I don't need a kilowatt, just 500-800 watts is plenty... RTTY contesting is a very high duty-cyc
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00222.html (8,975 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] FSK origin (score: 1)
Author: na4m@arrl.net
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 18:21:47 +0000
At 18:06 1/24/2004, John Orton wrote: Looking for information on the origin of "FSK" when and where. What depicted the name FSK. Frequency Shift Keying 73 Phil NA4M Bob wa6bob@arrl.net ______________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00293.html (6,889 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] DXP38 vs Soundcard stuff (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:41:23 +0000
At 01:21 3/13/2004, Kok Chen wrote: When you are comparing or use any kind of a device that has a A/D converter at the input (e.g., Sound Card, DXP38, etc), it is critical that the audio levels are a
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00185.html (7,616 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Sound Card Comparison (Soundmax On MoBo, TurtleBeach Santa Cruz, and M-Audio Revolution) (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:29:08 +0000
At 04:05 3/24/2004, Robert McGwier wrote: The best of all the 16 bit cards I have tested is the Turtle Beach Santa Cruz. The SB Live looked about like the Soundmax and I tossed it straight into the t
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00302.html (8,015 bytes)

5. [RTTY] ARRL's WinLink initiative and Pactor III (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:27:11 +0000
The ARRL's recent endorsement of WinLink 2000 for EMCOMM ARES use raises some interesting questions for RTTY and other HF digital modes. WinLink 2000 can use Pactor for HF links and supports Pactor I
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00078.html (7,385 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] ARRL's WinLink initiative and Pactor III (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:18:05 +0000
At 06:03 8/11/2004, Thomas K wrote: Since you have not realized YET that those PACTOR-III stations are out there ... you should not have a problem !!!! Yes - that's why I asked. I've never been inter
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00092.html (10,386 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Distortion (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:44:26 +0000
At 18:53 8/24/2004, Kok Chen wrote: So, if you operate without a single of the ALC bars lit, then IMO you are just as clean as operating "FSK" from that rig. I used to have my 1000MP's meter set to s
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00238.html (8,857 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Distortion (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:47:19 +0000
I use my 1000MP's RTTY (FSK) DIN connector "shift" input (pin 1) driven by a COM port TxD line via a simple homebrew keying interface that uses a transistor and resistor. The COM port is driven by MM
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00245.html (10,985 bytes)

9. [RTTY] Re: Help with keeping RF out of PC (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:39:54 +0000
At 16:53 1/13/2005, Bill Turner wrote: The better approach is to prevent the RF from getting into the computer in the first place. Ferrite is your friend. Also your friend is a high quality PC enclos
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00183.html (9,143 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] 6 meter RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: Phil & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:38:06 +0000
Correct - RTTY would definitely not be welcome on 50.125. It's the national 6M SSB calling freq. 50.110 is the international (DX) SSB/CW calling freq. My experiences in my brief 6M career of past 2-3
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00049.html (9,145 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Quiet PC power supply? (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 17:59:35 +0000
Antec also makes well constructed PC cases as well as p.s. - my homebrew custom system uses both and no RFI/noise problems. 73 Phil NA4M .--. .... .. .-.. _. ._ ...._ _ _ Phil Duff NA4M & Ann Duff Ge
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00176.html (7,514 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] possible tip for you vu4/rtty hunters (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 04:36:19 +0000
This morning was by far the best opening to VU4 from central Texas since this VU4 "hamfest" has been on the air. I made 2 quick QSO's with them on CW and RTTY: 1310Z VU4AN/VU3RWO CW 14.028 1314Z VU4A
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00126.html (7,992 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] VOLTA contest (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:26:03 +0000
Volta rules define "same country" as within your call area per following: COUNTRIES: ARRL Country list plus each call-area in Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand and the USA will be counted as a se
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-05/msg00112.html (6,901 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] log submission (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:45:13 +0000
I've tried submitting my NA4M/5 log as both NA4M@5-A.CBR and NA4M@5-A.cbr and the upload still barfs both ways. Their log submission page requires a ".CBR" file extension. When my .CBR log file is se
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00301.html (7,874 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] JARTS log submission (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:37:00 +0000
From JARTS page: http://www.edsoftz.com/JARTS/2006/cabrillo.html Cabrillo Spec for JARTS WW RTTY Contest The file name of Cabrillo file The file name of those Cabrillo files have to satisfy following
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00311.html (7,872 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] JARTS submission partII (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:36:20 +0000
That did it! Thanks Jim AD6WL. Windoz was hiding either a .log or .txt file extension even after I renamed the file to .CBR. It was being renamed to .CBR.log or .CBR.txt The JARTS site accepted my lo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00317.html (7,373 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] Rtty contest when Cw contest is on also (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:14:05 +0000
Sounds like sour grapes. Pay it no mind. It's a matter of personal choice for what enjoyment we as individuals want to get from our operating. Some will agree and some won't. The increasing popularit
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00080.html (9,702 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] Using Windows Contesting Software on a Mac (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:32:48 +0000
Kok - What about application access to hardware ports other than sound cards such as USB, Firewire, serial/parallel, etc. when running these virtualization products? 73 Phil NA4M -- -. .- ....- -- -.
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00088.html (8,402 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] 6 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:17:53 +0000
Take a look here for 6M band plans: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6_meters USA/NA 50.100 - 50.300 is SSB/CW 50.300 - 50.600 All modes 73 Phil NA4M -- -. .- ....- -- -. .- ....- -- -. .- ....- -- Phil
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-06/msg00014.html (8,173 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] 6 Meter RTTY is on 50.180 (score: 1)
Author: Phil Duff NA4M & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 01:54:25 +0000
Yep - I operate HF RTTY as well as 6M SSB/CW. There are a lot more 6m operators & activity now with the large number of factory transceivers coming with 6m built in. As a result, as Biil mentions, wh
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-06/msg00027.html (8,695 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu