Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nq4u@mtars.org: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] QRM'd and Why no JA Scores on 3830 (score: 1)
Author: "Jimmy O. Floyd" <nq4u@mtars.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:28:14 -0500
We had the same exact experience with the above XE station and two others -- an OK and SX on 20 meters and a W9 on 40 meters. I had three NEW hams/contesters in the station working this weekend and t
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00239.html (7,527 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Rascal FSK (score: 1)
Author: "Jimmy O. Floyd" <nq4u@mtars.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:57:11 -0600
Dennis, I currently use four of the Rascal interfaces from BUXCOMM and all have the USB adapter. Two of them are running FSK and two running AFSK. All are working well. The FSK rigs are one Kenwood T
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00204.html (8,517 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Rascal FSK (score: 1)
Author: "Jimmy O. Floyd" <nq4u@mtars.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:56:37 -0600
Forgot to mention .............. All units in my previous post are used with MMTTY and N1MM for contesting and general DX..... Also use ok with MixW Jimmy O. Floyd NQ4U NAVMARSCORPS MARS NNN0RKO ARRL
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00207.html (8,153 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY in ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: "Jimmy O. Floyd" <nq4u@mtars.org>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:27:37 -0500
We had a full time RTTY station last year and plan to one or more again this year. The new and inactive hams had a blast learning a new mode and/or the simplicity of getting on RTTY. I have found tha
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-05/msg00031.html (8,676 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY - Field Day - (score: 1)
Author: "Jimmy O. Floyd" <nq4u@mtars.org>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:55:23 -0500
I have read with interest the comments on RTTY and Field Day. It appears to me that if more FD sites would utilize RTTY as a station, then more activity might happen -- The old adage "Build it and th
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-05/msg00049.html (7,509 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1)
Author: nq4u@mtars.org
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 21:40:37 +0000
I have been following this thread with great interest and some of the comments really surprise me. Especially the comments about interference being caused by the unattended WINLINK RMS. Now as for me
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00304.html (8,890 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu