Mail Archive Search: <+from:pcooper@guernsey.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:pcooper@guernsey.net: 847 ]

Total 847 documents matching your query.

301. [RTTY] Re 3830 (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:23:13 -0000; Hi again! Thank goodness it isn't just me that couldn't find the 3830 page for the BARTG Sprint! I have just seen that several have contacted Bruce WA7BNM to let him know. I was expecting to see load; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00664.html (6,929 bytes)
302. Re: [RTTY] OTHR QRM (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:23:16 -0000; Hi all, Yes, it was loud and noisy here too. It was around S9+20 from 21085 right up to 21120. I was hoping to pick up some JA mults, and maybe even a YB for that elusive OC mult on 15m, but even lat; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00665.html (7,190 bytes)
303. [RTTY] Missing contact (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:59:20 -0000; Hi all (yet again!) I have just been checking through my log, and noticed that the summary sheet shows 284 Q's, yet the last number I sent was 286. I know one call was a dupe (he actually called me t; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00666.html (7,552 bytes)
304. [RTTY] FMRE website? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:10:34 -0000; Hi all, I was just checking dates/times etc for the FMRE website, and although the rules are listed on Don's RTTYContesting website, there is no response from the FMRE website. Is the website just do; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00721.html (7,215 bytes)
305. Re: [RTTY] FT1k or ProIII (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:13:18 -0000; Hi Doug and the group, I have used both. I own a 756Pro, but have used an FT1k in contests for CW. Plus points for each: I'd have to say that for RTTY, the 756Pro (and any of the Pro's) definitely ha; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00021.html (9,356 bytes)
306. [RTTY] GU0SUP FMRE contest (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:27:53 -0000; Hi all, What a ball! I hadn't planned on entering this one, so didn't start till around 0900 this morning, and would have been happy with a 100 or so contacts. This was just a casual operation from m; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00053.html (8,049 bytes)
307. [RTTY] XE results for 2005 (score: 1): Author: "pcooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 08:50:35 +0000; Hi all, I hadn't looked before, as I didn't do much in the contest last year, but as the results are on the RTTYcontesting website, I checked. For some reason, GU0SUP is listed as ISLE OF MAN !!! I'l; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00069.html (6,427 bytes)
308. [RTTY] GU0SUP WPX - SOABLP (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:22:35 -0000; Great! What a contest! I assume everyone enjoyed it? I had a somewhat busy Friday, even though I had taken the day off to prepare, and to get a few of those household chores out of the way, and it se; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00167.html (10,648 bytes)
309. [RTTY] WPX Award (score: 1): Author: "pcooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:17:47 +0000; Hi all, Just out of curiosity, I checked the CQ website, and it would appear that there is no WPX award specifically for RTTY! Maybe we all ought to ask CQ to introduce a RTTY endorsement? Anyone els; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00186.html (6,178 bytes)
310. [RTTY] WPX & RTTY award (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:42:57 -0000; Hi again all, There have been a few responses to my email, but just how do you make this known to the good folks at CQ? There doesn't appear to be an email address to use for the awards team! Any ide; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00201.html (7,308 bytes)
311. Re: [RTTY] WPX and strategy... (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:42:59 -0000; Hi once more! Strategy is an important issue here, especially with contests that offer higher points on lower bands, and even more so when mults count only once. Deciding which strategy to use has al; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00202.html (8,929 bytes)
312. Re: [RTTY] WPX & RTTY award (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:08:24 -0000; Hi Jim and the group, Well, I don't think we can ask much more at present! At least the question will be asked at CQ, although it doesn't look promising. Perhaps they just don't realise just how popu; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00233.html (7,507 bytes)
313. [RTTY] CW interference! (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:39:23 -0000; Hi all, How about we send emails of complaint to the various folk concerned about the band-plans over this past weekend! CW all the way up to 14120, without ANY thought for us poor folk trying to enj; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00259.html (6,775 bytes)
314. [RTTY] Re my comments about CW! (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:10:03 -0000; Hi all, Perhaps I ought to clarify that my comments were meant in a humourour way, and were in no way intended to be a serious suggestion! Besides, from what I saw, many of us RTTY types were playing; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00264.html (6,834 bytes)
315. Re: [RTTY] YJ0ADX and JW4GHA (score: 1): Author: "pcooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:43:30 +0000; Hi all, Oh! It is so depressing to see all this DX about when you are at work! I did get Roger JW4GHA on 30m RTTY the other evening, but would also like 40m. It looks as htough Roger is on Bear Islan; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00059.html (6,419 bytes)
316. [RTTY] WAE Certificate (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 18:17:37 -0000; Hi all, I have just received my WAE certificate, (Class 1 all RTTY) and it is number 6! I was surprised at how much I had, and easily managed the 60 countries and 200 band-slots for the class 1 award; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00104.html (6,827 bytes)
317. Re: [RTTY] Highlighting QSO's (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:19:17 -0000; Hello Peter, Yes, this is a "known" feature of this particular contest module! I suspect that last time, you set up the contest, then shut down Writelog, and re-started it before the contest? This is; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00126.html (7,608 bytes)
318. [RTTY] RE@ The log checking story by Paolo I2UIY (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:02:46 -0000; Hi all, I read the text from Paolo with amazement! I am surprised at just how tolerant he was, especially with those 151 logs that were in totally the wrong format. Personally, I would have returned; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00137.html (8,585 bytes)
319. Re: [RTTY] Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender (score: 1): Author: "pcooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:13:11 +0000; Hi all, I also get this, and I was wondering if it was because someone had set something like an "out of office" notice, or maybe had some sort of reply request set. Cheers Phil GU0SUP ______________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00147.html (6,528 bytes)
320. Re: [RTTY] Answering QSL's (score: 1): Author: "pcooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:19:18 +0000; Hi Tom and the group, Oooooooh! That sounds a very dodgy practice! I always check the card against my log, especially for contest contacts, just in case. I recently had one card in that proved to be; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00148.html (7,736 bytes)

Current List: 301 - 320
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]