Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws0@gmail.com: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:40:07 -0600
If you look at your RTTY QSOs, particularly since LoTW came online in 2003, you'll get an even higher match rate - mine is over 50% for RTTY. Even this past November's phone SS has had a good match r
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00446.html (8,583 bytes)

162. Re: [RTTY] Best RTTY program/hardware (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:08:36 -0600
Just because Apple sells systems with Intel processors doesn't mean software written for Mac OS X will run on Windows. It's the OS that's important, not the hardware underneath. When this company lap
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00496.html (9,901 bytes)

163. Re: [RTTY] Best RTTY program/hardware (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:23:39 -0600
The windowing system in OS X isn't nearly the same as the ones used under Linux ... unless is supports X11 (which I will guess it doesn't). -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00497.html (8,852 bytes)

164. Re: [RTTY] Best RTTY program/hardware (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:56:06 -0600
Do you mean under the GNU General Public License (GPL) or under GNU itself (most of the suite of applications that make up a Linux system when used with the Linux kernel)? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | pla
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00537.html (8,802 bytes)

165. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint Rules Questions (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:29:24 -0600
Trivial, yes, but be careful! I operated a test or two on RTTY in IL as N5UWY back in 2004 after I got back on RTTY (after an 8-year absence). Then hit the Sprint which required N5UWY/9. As a result,
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00539.html (8,915 bytes)

166. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint Rules Questions (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:23:36 -0600
You can and I have. But those QSOs signed with the wrong certificate never ever go away. ARRL says this isn't a problem but I (and others) disagree. BTW, you can configure location info in TQSL (the
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00541.html (9,852 bytes)

167. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint Rules Questions (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:04:03 -0600
Known bad data should always be purged from any database. If the ARRL is going to insist on digital certificates, "double-blind" type uploads (you can't see if you have "QSLs waiting" - no trolling f
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00547.html (9,935 bytes)

168. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint Rules Questions (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:53:49 -0600
Agreed which is why I said they need a mechanism or procedure to have them removed or at least the ability to mark them as bad. Agreed that we can't just give end-users the ability to delete at will.
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00557.html (9,285 bytes)

169. Re: [RTTY] Software (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:04:10 -0600
I prefer free software as well and look for items that are released under the GPL or other open source or free licenses. Hard to do on the M$-Windows platform with its tradition of pay-to-play softwa
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00588.html (7,346 bytes)

170. Re: [RTTY] Software (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:27:30 -0600
Undoubtedly! My first couple RTTY tests in 1994 were with PC-PakRATT and a PK-232. I found out about WF1B and got our club (W5YM) to order a copy. What a HUGE difference! I see that WF1B.com is no lo
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00591.html (7,209 bytes)

171. Re: [RTTY] XE Contest (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:00:49 -0600
I'll be on from OK for the same reason ... but looking for WY and OK. I guess contest results aren't that important when you aren't in the Top Ten box. :-D -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | T
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00049.html (7,818 bytes)

172. Re: [RTTY] XE Contest (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:06:02 -0600
Oooh, and AR and ND for the RTTY leg of TPA. So OK and WY count double for me. :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00050.html (7,600 bytes)

173. Re: [RTTY] does anyone listen any more? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 18:25:06 -0600
In answer to your subject line question: No. This has been another edition of Simple Answers To Simple Questions. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! __________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00122.html (7,128 bytes)

174. [RTTY] RTTY WPX N5UWY SOAB LP (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:33:22 -0600
Kinda fun that you could use the cluster without being bumped up a class. CQ WW RTTY WPX Contest Call: N5UWY Operator(s): N5UWY Station: N5UWY Class: SOAB LP QTH: Norman, Okla Operating Time (hrs): 1
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00213.html (6,916 bytes)

175. [RTTY] Slow Baudot (Re: WPX for me Re: CQWPX RTTY 2009 for K0BX (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:43:58 -0600
I've been meaning to mention this. I've noticed this on the receive end the past couple of 'tests. Sounds like it's half a beat slow. I use MMTTY under N1MM as well but don't seem to notice this whil
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00237.html (7,345 bytes)

176. Re: [RTTY] Desecheo this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:17:01 -0600
I have yet to hear K5D "boom" on anything yet, but I did work them on 15 RTTY about 10 minutes before you did. Now ZF2AM on 75 the other night, *he* was booming in. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaw
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00312.html (8,737 bytes)

177. Re: [RTTY] Desecheo this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:44:01 -0600
That's just it, I don't. Well, I don't think so. I'm in EM15, so they are about 3600 km from me. I have no trouble working KP4, KP2, et al. The relative spotlessness of the Sun has a lot to do with i
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00316.html (9,007 bytes)

178. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:51:17 -0600
Tried to work them on 30 RTTY, but they didn't hear me. Did work them on 15 RTTY and that Q showed up. Also got them on 17 and 80 phone and, amazingly, 30 CW (used CwGet and the memories in the 746 :
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00357.html (7,916 bytes)

179. Re: [RTTY] Worst / best NAQP exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 10:41:05 -0600
More like the op didn't know how to get his software to *stop* sending serial numbers. :-) Good to work you on RTTY - I'll make sure to use that QSO for TPA along with our SSB and CW QSOs! -- Peter L
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00110.html (7,718 bytes)

180. Re: [RTTY] Fun, but (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:57:02 -0600
If you're not part of the solution, doesn't that make you part of the precipitate? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00118.html (8,833 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
This search system is powered by Namazu