Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws0@gmail.com: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:55:09 -0500
Or teleprinter ... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00007.html (7,115 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] ARRL WAS Digital Award Numbers (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 13:56:58 -0500
It doesn't appear so. From the posts here, the numbering of RTTY WAS didn't reset when it was lumped in with the other modes. But you can't get a numbered Packet award any more. The ARRL's page descr
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00009.html (8,223 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] VK2SG RTTY DX Notes Survey (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:00:31 -0500
You're assuming everyone present knows what the "VK2SG RTTY DX Notes" is/are. Not true. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@c
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00047.html (7,402 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] Subscribing to the VK2SG-RTTY list (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:15:49 -0500
Done! Thanks for the links, Don. Is this like a Cluster, in that spots are posted as they happen, or do you or someone else edit the week's events together and post? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00055.html (7,326 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] First RTTY Contest (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:35:08 -0500
What were the other 9 stations? :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00059.html (6,890 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] Interesting Buro SWL Card (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:52:59 -0500
Why don't we set up a regular "160 RTTY Activity Night"? I have nothing that will load on 160, but I'd listen at least. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail ________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00063.html (7,195 bytes)

27. [RTTY] What is DXCC RTTY? (Re: Big Shakeup on the Top Ten (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:11:07 -0500
I see no explicit mention of PSK31 or any of the newer modes. From http://www.arrl.org/awards/dxcc/rules.html#si : "d) RTTY: Contacts must be made using radioteletype since November 15, 1945. (Baudot
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00169.html (8,181 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] SCC RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:12:08 -0500
People have this trouble with the ARRL November Sweepstakes with the most notorius example being the MIT club station (W1MX), which signs "09", even though there weren't licenses until 1912. :-) It p
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00188.html (7,881 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] SCC RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:52:48 -0500
Another thing to remember - license, permit, and callsign don't always mean the same thing in other countries. IIRC, Canadian hams have an operator's permit that is separate from their station callsi
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00190.html (7,343 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] SCC RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:24:42 -0500
I've got to agree. I'm in a technical field at work and ham radio is also a technical field and sometimes it's really important to have the smallest details be correct. I understand about the "bean c
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00193.html (8,219 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] SCC RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 11:36:46 -0500
Huh. Well, I thought that was a more sensible way to go. Seems to me if there was a lifetime operator's permit it would save a lot of hassle and retesting and then if you wanted to operate a station,
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00199.html (8,306 bytes)

32. [RTTY] AA5AU? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:00:43 -0500
Anyone heard from Don? Mapping his house from his license record puts him in a bad spot, near as I can tell. What about the other folks on this list down that way? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gm
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00253.html (6,714 bytes)

33. [RTTY] OT: Katrina and Disaster Communications (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:32:41 -0500
I was still in high school when Camille sruck, and was a more active ham radio operator then than now. I recall that there was considerable advance warning on Camille, although the exact track was no
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-08/msg00265.html (9,882 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] WIN98 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:59:44 -0500
Windows must not have drivers for the ports. Go into Device Manager and see if they are there or are disabled. You should be able to update the drivers from there, if necessary. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00041.html (7,789 bytes)

35. [RTTY] Source for RFI bead "variety pack" (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:46:02 -0500
I never solved my RFI problems after I 1) fried my CPU/mobo, 2) replaced my ISA SoundBlaster with a PIC version, and 3) added a 4-port serial card to my radio PC. All three things happened in close p
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00089.html (7,555 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] Source for RFI bead "variety pack" (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:04:09 -0500
Anybody? Anybody? Bueller? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! 'They that can give up essential Liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00091.html (8,460 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] Source for RFI bead "variety pack" (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:22:37 -0500
Palomar Engineering was who I was thinking of and I've already ordered! Thanks, all! (esp Mac!) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! 'They that can give up essential Liberty to o
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00092.html (7,324 bytes)

38. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY N5UWY/9 SOAB LP (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:18:41 -0500
CQ Worldwide DX Contest, RTTY Call: N5UWY/9 Operator(s): N5UWY Station: N5UWY Class: SOAB LP QTH: Illinois, USA Operating Time (hrs): 7 Summary: Band QSOs Pts State/Prov DX Zones -- 80: 15 16 11 2 2
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00140.html (7,511 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] VO2NS (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:33:32 -0500
The program should be updated since NL seems to be the preferred abbreviation. If CT and WF1B could handle that ... :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "They that can give u
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00167.html (7,261 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] PARTIAL Crib list (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:59:27 -0500
It's in CT and N1MM and WF1B and ... it's still cheating. I'm with you, you either copy the call or you don't. Friend files are just as bad in NAQP, IMHO, which is why I try to use a different name e
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00206.html (7,605 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
This search system is powered by Namazu