Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws0@gmail.com: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Request for Member comment on Proposed HF Band Plan Change (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:54:19 -0600
The "emergency communications" angle, eh? Hadn't thought of that because I assumed it was boat owners too cheap to use a commercial service (as per 97.113(a)(5)). Hmm. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws p
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00205.html (8,588 bytes)

282. [RTTY] ICYMI - next week's ARRL Meeting of the Bored. (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:06:00 -0500
4.2. Status update/reporting items and/or FCC submissions since January 2015 Board Meeting 4.2.1. RM-11708; ARRL Petition for Rule Making to delete restrictions on symbol rates for data communication
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00073.html (6,873 bytes)

283. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:28:25 -0500
Given your rate of pay, there needs to be some balance between the amount of work you need to do, not to mention the amount of flak you have to take, and the question of fairness. I think your plan s
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00037.html (10,227 bytes)

284. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:30:28 -0500
I'd be against that. Makrothen already uses grids and ... QSO Party uses names? Exchanging time is hard and, apparently, above the abilities of some. Which makes it a good exchange. *I* am able to ha
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00038.html (9,988 bytes)

285. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:51:20 -0500
No, no. Put them all in all contests! I *like* the November Sweepstakes exchange. I just don't want to see time taken out because "it's too hard". I wouldn't want the WAE folks to take out QTCs, eith
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00040.html (10,227 bytes)

286. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:39:29 -0500
Also callsigns. Those should go, too, because a lot of times people copy them wrong. Did you know that some of the foreign ones you letters and numbers in different orders! Too hard! RST is, fortunat
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00090.html (9,006 bytes)

287. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:33:07 -0500
Thank you, Ed. Seconded! ^^^^ Worth repeating. ^^^^ If someone thinks a contest is too hard or unfair, then they should -- and this is radical, I know -- choose not to participate. I don't know other
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00094.html (9,317 bytes)

288. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:29:20 -0500
WHAT!?!?!?! This is OUTRAGEOUS! How dare you make *understand* it!!! :-D -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list R
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00098.html (7,921 bytes)

289. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:54:29 -0500
We'll obviously never agree but when I see the same thing over and over, like a name, I get bored. Time, like a serial number, is ever-changing. And times even less boring because it changes regardle
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00123.html (9,888 bytes)

290. Re: [RTTY] BARTG March HF 2014 Contest - RESULTS (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:09:58 -0500
Your message says "2014" in two places and the link takes you to the 2014 results. Why are people whining about 2015? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ______________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00165.html (9,149 bytes)

291. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Board Meeting - Approved modified HF band plan changes (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:24:26 -0500
I'm not sure if the fiddling with the band edges is intended as appeasement or not. Moving the phone/CW-Data line in the 80-m band was a mistake and I see they are trying to get that reversed. The up
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00075.html (9,806 bytes)

292. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Board Meeting - Approved modified HF band plan changes (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:32:55 -0500
I've always said 3: an entry level with limited privileges (think post-Novice Enhancement Novice, c.1990), a regular license that gives you everything, everywhere, and a top-level license for those t
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00080.html (10,285 bytes)

293. Re: [RTTY] 2016 Handbook (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:00:28 -0600
I wondered if that was him, himself! -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-12/msg00030.html (6,894 bytes)

294. [RTTY] N1MM+ MMTTY -> decode OK, transmit diddles, no chars? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 12:12:35 -0600
Just updated to the latest N1MM+. Using MMTTY as TU via DigiKeyer II. When I send a macro, the chars burst into the interface window, I get a few diddles, then nothing. The radio is clearly getting P
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00008.html (7,565 bytes)

295. Re: [RTTY] N1MM+ MMTTY -> decode OK, transmit diddles, no chars? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 13:14:52 -0600
Missed one. On the MMTTY USB Port Options - Limiting speed. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00010.html (8,161 bytes)

296. Re: [RTTY] N1MM Logger+ RTTY macro question (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:52:51 -0600
Fewer and fewer flowery exchanges noted over the weekend. Worst thing, I think, is the lack of anything after the call when calling CQ. Doesn't much matter if it's CQ, RU, TEST, whatever (tho' shorte
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00037.html (7,696 bytes)

297. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:30:19 -0600
Hooey. I'd rather sponsors try to find a niche with their exchange. My favorite one is the ARRL November Sweepstakes exchange but that doesn't mean I think all contests should use it. As for software
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00079.html (8,693 bytes)

298. [RTTY] Interesting quote ... (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:54:54 -0600
ARRL has analyzed the regulatory limitations as part of a comprehensive effort to make more efficient the use of those HF allocations, especially with respect to encouraging further experimentation a
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00080.html (6,994 bytes)

299. Re: [RTTY] Bartg RTTY Spring (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:09:27 -0600
Because, as we all know, NO ONE governs the FCC! :-D It could be worded better: ``U.S. stations must use correct call or suffix for area of operation as these are used as a multiplier.'' Of course yo
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00108.html (8,355 bytes)

300. Re: [RTTY] Robot Processing RST (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:10:38 -0600
If I configure my program to transmit 589 instead of 599 and the other op's program logs that I sent 599, will the robot kick that out as a mismatch? I think inclusion of RST is silly and would rathe
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00260.html (9,975 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu