Mail Archive Search: <+from:psussman@pactor.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:psussman@pactor.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Comments (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:54:32 -0500; I spoke too soon .. my comments and many others are now available for viewing. For those interested my comments are at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7521063675 73 de Phil - N8PS -- Quoti; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00158.html (9,603 bytes)
122. Re: [RTTY] Rm 11708 in ARRL BOD (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:10:53 -0500; Also interesting to note the 20 min break ahead of item #51. Oh, to be a fly on the wall, eh? 73 de Phil - N8PS -- The board of directors minutes are out at http://www.arrl.org/files/file/ODV/January; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00327.html (7,232 bytes)
123. Re: [RTTY] Triathlon DX Contest this Saturday (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:58:51 -0500; I am confused about this contest. Are different modes (CW, SSB, RTTY) on different dates? On 01-FEB-14 is which mode? All modes? Please explain. Thanks ES 73 de Phil - N8PS -- Quoting Kostas SV1DPI <; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00360.html (8,712 bytes)
124. Re: [RTTY] Triathlon DX Contest this Saturday (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:02:51 -0500; Note: I am blocked from viewing web site given by ISP server. 73 de Phil N8PS -- I am confused about this contest. Are different modes (CW, SSB, RTTY) on different dates? On 01-FEB-14 is which mode?; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00361.html (9,300 bytes)
125. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 15:40:32 -0500; I agree with Charlie, except for two points: First, this syndrome does not only affect RTTY operators alone, but it has been 'trickled' into the RTTY gentlemen's community. Some attribute this lack o; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00013.html (8,002 bytes)
126. [RTTY] And the mobiles could follow (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:00:51 -0500; I do have RTTY capability in my mobile; however, regarding a wanted DX station, it only works if some 'big gun' is kind enough to advise the DX, "there's an RTTY mobile on frequency". I'd wager mobil; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00047.html (9,301 bytes)
127. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 13:42:10 -0500; Bill, It's always good to hear (read) your thoughts. Believe it or not, this topic came up before -- many years ago. It was (after a lot of back and forth) decided that it created more problems than; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00057.html (9,960 bytes)
128. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:39:29 -0500; Are there any 'hints' for working DX from a mobile (I have a camper with RTTY capability) or QRP ? It seems to be that unless the DX station asks for mobiles or QRPs, there's no way to 'break' a big; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00073.html (12,144 bytes)
129. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 12:41:28 -0500; In addition, another thought. This scheme does not reduce the number of transmitters. As it is currently, when running split, QSO's in progress (UP) get clobbered by a lack of monitoring. In this pro; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00076.html (11,747 bytes)
130. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:15:53 -0500; Steve makes a good point. The new proposal does have a distinct disadvantage. The current 'split' operation supposedly allows the DX station to answer without being 'overrun' by continual calls. Esse; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00109.html (12,848 bytes)
131. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 08:05:48 -0500; I believe Chen hit the nail on the head (as he usually does) when he says, "definitely won't work well for 100 watts/vertical guys.." He's absolutely right. This dovetails right into what I was discu; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00148.html (11,937 bytes)
132. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:51:56 -0500; I found that Bill has been a respectful moderator. I don't say that lightly. Bill tolerates opinions on the list that are at times vastly different from his own. When dealing with many of us (who at; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00155.html (10,383 bytes)
133. [RTTY] QSL et. el. (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:36:36 -0500; Over the years I've noticed how QSLing has changed. Once upon a time ham exchanged QSL cards by post and occasionally in person. QSL bureaus were established in various localities to reduce the overa; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00187.html (8,491 bytes)
134. [RTTY] Question (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:24:58 -0500; It looks like someone is harvesting email addresses from the list to send out a lot of spam. Has anyone else on the server noticed this? 73 de Phil - N8PS ____________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00200.html (6,436 bytes)
135. Re: [RTTY] Get selective DX-Spots by Email (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:34:18 -0500; Walter has done a fantastic job. Now all that remains is: 1. Once a spot is received from MyDXspot, it should automatically be decoded and the rig set to the precise spotting frequency. 2. The call s; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00221.html (9,694 bytes)
136. Re: [RTTY] Amateur Radio Teletype Society Bulletins online & great new Jim Ha... (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 21:19:40 -0500; Regrettably I agree with John. I say regrettably because I have unfortunately learned the 'price' of dealing with Facebook. They reap and harvest EVERYTHING and I mean EVERYTHING. Talk about 'big-bro; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00279.html (11,486 bytes)
137. Re: [RTTY] SPAM-LOW: Re: Amateur Radio Teletype Society Bulletins online & great new Jim Ha... (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:57:05 -0500; Kai, It's amazing to me how some people are so deceived by Facebook and never realize that: 1. The wording of their 'terms' is deceptive and offers a false sense of security. and 2. Beyond what they; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00285.html (16,092 bytes)
138. Re: [RTTY] Being the fox - pileup running (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:30:00 -0500; Actually working split ties up more than two frequencies. There was an SSB station working split yesterday on 20m. "listening up 5 to 20". Of course the band was a mess with split callings covering e; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00319.html (10,994 bytes)
139. [RTTY] Prefix characters (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:45:56 -0500; I know this has probably been brought up before, but somehow I can't locate the information. When running RTTY (not necessarily in a test) and you are beginning to transmit, I somehow recall that you; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00342.html (6,686 bytes)
140. Re: [RTTY] About N4II's experiment... (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:32:15 -0400; Poor Joe, Aren't you aware these items are no longer of concern. All of the newest products are NGDS .. next generation defined software. Forget to decouple the USB power -- no problem. The latest so; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00112.html (13,896 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]