Mail Archive Search: <+from:psussman@pactor.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:psussman@pactor.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 on Oct 4th ARRL Exec Committee Adgenda (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 19:55:58 -0400; I understand that has already been done. A few director comments last year reflected the view that late filings would of necessity have to be disregarded since the ARRL already had some assurance of; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00031.html (8,709 bytes)
162. [RTTY] OT Computer Assistance (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:15:58 -0500; I have been researching the replacement of the three XP machines here in the shack and the results have been discouraging. None of my programs: word processing, spreadsheet, logging, rig interface, a; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00045.html (7,207 bytes)
163. Re: [TenTec] OT Computer Assistance (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 08:05:16 -0500; Thanks to everyone for their comments and suggestions in my quest to upgrade. I must apologize to those who sent personal email objecting to my use of the reflector to create such a clogging plethora; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00058.html (9,726 bytes)
164. [RTTY] RM-11708 status (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:01:25 -0500; Does anyone know if there's been an updated status to FCC RM-11708? It seems nothing has been posted recently. TNX ES 73 de Phil - N8PS _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing li; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00222.html (6,911 bytes)
165. [RTTY] RM-11708 Status (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:24:11 -0500; I received a couple of personal notes on this and yes, there have been comments posted. My request dealt with the status of the RM. It was opened in Nov of 2013 and has not been updated since. Normal; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00223.html (7,419 bytes)
166. Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes published (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:06:22 -0500; Agreed, A bunch of Technicians running amuk on the HF bands without the least care about who gets 'clobbered' by their transmissions is the last thing that we need on HF. Perhaps a mentor program is; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00241.html (11,711 bytes)
167. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 08:40:57 -0400; I read this post with a degree of nostalgia and note the migration of RTTY contests into the realm absolute auditing. In RTTY today: You can't participate in a contest unless you own a computer. You; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00012.html (10,821 bytes)
168. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 15:52:42 -0400; Thanks for the exchange.. But, ?You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can?t please all of the people all of the time.? ―; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00019.html (19,025 bytes)
169. [TenTec] PO entroute to GE (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:38:32 -0400; About 20 years ago the move was afoot to migrate from something that was indefinitely fixable to, what was called at the time, "planned obsolescence". That included chips that would go out of product; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00132.html (8,239 bytes)
170. Re: [RTTY] PO entroute to GE (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:02:27 -0400; Bill, et. el, I was speaking (off the record) with a programmer working on creation of a secure verification protocol. This is an independent contractor competing to supply a ham software application; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00136.html (7,854 bytes)
171. Re: [RTTY] More GRITTY observations (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:09:02 -0400; Chen, As usual, I'm confused by USOS and the functionality between stations. I understand there are only 16 possible combinations. -See below Is there an easy explanation of the best way to set your; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00182.html (11,726 bytes)
172. Re: [RTTY] More GRITTY observations (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:02:43 -0400; After reading the information referenced, I wonder if the assumption can be made that the "USOS sender assumes that the receiver has shifted to LTRS shift after the sender transmits a space character; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00184.html (10,148 bytes)
173. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Board Meeting - Approved modified HF band plan changes (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:42:08 -0400; Remember, Most of your dues does NOT pay for lobbying. An interesting question however is: Over the same time period, what was the salary increase of those who lobby on behalf of the ARRL? (Surprised; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00074.html (7,948 bytes)
174. [RTTY] Filter test (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:56:47 -0400; Receiving test _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-08/msg00043.html (6,098 bytes)
175. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:46:04 -0500; Oh, Hank, Just think, one more bit and your life is over. Golly, what if you had to check what you send to make sure it is the absolute minimum required, or you will no longer be able to participate; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00233.html (10,147 bytes)
176. Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 06:54:01 -0400; Ian is correct. Technology is a wonderful thing and is a good supplement. But, it is no substitute for common courtesy. From another point of view, many listeners might be observing a waterfall, all; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00267.html (8,856 bytes)
177. Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 15:37:20 -0400; Ah, yes, the 'laws' of one way propagation: One: The consequence of one-way propagation when working split. That's when a multitude of stations call (you know the typical up 5-25 -- yep I've seen/hea; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00285.html (11,685 bytes)
178. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:07:39 -0400; I agree with most of what Thomas says; however, as a Pactor operator myself and a long time user I do disagree with one aspect. Pactor operators as a whole are not rude nor selfish. Instead it's the; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00084.html (9,148 bytes)
179. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:26:30 -0400; Jim, My point was that 'rude and selfish' points to owners of auto mailbox systems, whether they run PACTOR or some other mode. It's not all PACTOR users, just owners who clobber everyone with their; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00093.html (12,666 bytes)
180. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Activity outside of contests (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:48:45 -0400; Barry, I'm interested in working ZS, but short on hours to do so. For me 15 would be better than 20, but 15 has been dead over here. 73 de Phil - N8PS Hi All After a quite lengthy absence from RTTY d; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00027.html (10,372 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]