Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:psussman@pactor.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [RTTY] Anyone using IC-751A on AFSK? (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 02:33:19 -0500
I have used both an ICOM 751 and a 751a for RTTY. On the 751, I used the rear molex jack with an external modem. On the 751a I migrated to the front panel mic jack. I happened to have an ICOM phone p
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-03/msg00048.html (8,617 bytes)

82. [RTTY] AFSK RTTY on USB question (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:00:51 -0500
You will be transmitting/receiving in reverse (RTTY is polarity sensitive). So, Mark and Space will be reversed. In addition the 'dial' frequency will be 'off' in the reverse direction. The AFSK tone
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-03/msg00110.html (8,348 bytes)

83. [RTTY] Manual Overload (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 08:52:20 -0400
I am overloaded with old service manuals going back years. I have many GE, Motorola, RCA, Uniden, Regency, Zetron, service manuals for mobiles, portables, and base stations -- three library rooms ful
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00032.html (6,413 bytes)

84. [RTTY] Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:22:45 -0400
I've been following this thread and both sides make good points. My contention, which is obvious, is that no matter the category of entry -- the entry of a peanut whistle station is frustrating. But
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00246.html (9,921 bytes)

85. [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:40:44 -0400
Dan, I agree with John .. stick with it. Everyone has disagreements now and then. However, a through discussion includes everyone -- including those with whom we strongly disagree. Frankly posts by D
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00327.html (11,741 bytes)

86. [RTTY] Help, just a tad off topic (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:10:11 -0400
I've recently changed my logging computer to WIN7, and it will access my Wi-Fi access to the internet. But it can't access any of the other (4) XP machines on the network. Nor can I print or exchange
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-07/msg00073.html (8,276 bytes)

87. Re: [RTTY] Help, just a tad off topic (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:46:22 -0400
Well, to my chagrin, I actually found out what's going on. My WIN7 is WIN7 'starter' and all the file sharing, networking, and print sharing is DISABLED in this version. So, I can't do anything becau
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-07/msg00077.html (11,395 bytes)

88. Re: [RTTY] Help, just a tad off topic (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:03:33 -0400
I was quoted $159 for a Home Premium License AND the computer could NOT be upgraded since it only meets the 'starter' specifications. I was told to just scrap the junk and buy a preloaded machine for
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-07/msg00079.html (13,611 bytes)

89. Re: [RTTY] To the Reflector (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:42:57 -0400
Bill, I know it was a tough decision and I applaud your facing the issue head on. One thing is for sure .. you were trying your best. No one can do better than that! Years ago I also moderated a list
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00107.html (7,533 bytes)

90. Re: [RTTY] Off Frequency Stations. (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:38:02 -0400
I do not know if this was mentioned previously, but shift also plays a part. Some stations run a 200 Hz shift while others run 170Hz. This will cause discrepencies when tuning. 73 de Phil - N8PS -- _
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00081.html (11,376 bytes)

91. Re: [RTTY] JARTS results 2009. (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:49:34 -0500
David, Once upon a time, many years ago, the RTTY contests were conducted in a gentlemanly fashion and the results were not so 'fixed in stone' that an obvious error could not be corrected. Today, so
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00039.html (10,511 bytes)

92. Re: [RTTY] newbie (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 06:56:17 -0500
Greetings Cor and welcome, de Phil - N8PS -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00191.html (7,630 bytes)

93. [RTTY] To CHEN (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:58:46 -0500
Chen, I've been trying to email you directly, but I think I'm landing in your spam filter. Please email me. Thanks, 73 de Phil - N8PS PS. Appologies to the reflector for the bandwidth. ______________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00083.html (7,607 bytes)

94. Re: [RTTY] Secret (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:10:58 -0500
Now I'm sure that Rick, N6PE, meant this as a sarcastic piece. Be careful the jest for even now there is an elite group of contesters who have been attempting to secretly install these rules. Heavens
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00476.html (9,305 bytes)

95. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:27:37 -0500
When looking at this thread, I wonder what's more important. Is it achieving the satisfaction of working in a contest or fretting over lost milliseconds. When winning a contest is more important to s
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00125.html (11,133 bytes)

96. [RTTY] Test new server (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:52:43 -0500
Please forgive bandwidth _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00282.html (6,534 bytes)

97. [RTTY] New Server (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:29:37 -0400
Testing new mail server. Please excuse the bandwidth 73 de Phil - N8PS _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00082.html (6,334 bytes)

98. Re: [RTTY] Baud racing (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:22:15 -0400
In my experimenting days, years ago, I tinkered with AEA modems as well as KAM and MFJ. This was in the time of the RTTY Journal when I wrote the PACTOR column for Dale Sinner. I was able to use RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00045.html (9,082 bytes)

99. [RTTY] Mark & Space - High Tones (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:58:00 -0400
I've been wandering on the AA5AU RTTY pages in search of Don's email address. After my exchange with Chen, I had a question about the RTTY Intro page on Don's site. It is noted that high tones are 21
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00052.html (6,864 bytes)

100. Re: [RTTY] Mark & Space - High Tones (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 06:18:14 -0400
Thanks Joe and Jay, The common low tones used in Europe was what I meant. Unfortunately, in in RTTY, 'polarity' is important. Unlike 'mirror modes' (which actually has some other name that I can not
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00067.html (16,026 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu