Mail Archive Search: <+from:rkolarik@neb.rr.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rkolarik@neb.rr.com: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

141. [RTTY] Director response (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:49:47 -0600; I'm having another bad day and way behind on things, I'll get caught up later but thought the group should know the respose I got from my division directror. I sent him some references to the IARU ba; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00309.html (10,131 bytes)
142. Re: [RTTY] Director response (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:18:25 -0600; Okay guys I'm still having delays getting mail from the list and the reply from Kai hasn't showed up yet. As currently written Part 97 only allows unspecified codes on one band, 1.25m and 100kHz bw.; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00315.html (11,839 bytes)
143. Re: [RTTY] Director response (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 19:45:54 -0600; Okay Joe, I stand corrected. The unspecified codes are currently allowed only 6m and above but not HF. Ron K0IDT -- Original Message -- From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com> To: "Ron Kolarik" <; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00321.html (12,592 bytes)
144. Re: [RTTY] It's spreading (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:05:16 -0600; Bill you'll probably have to go in and kick that particular beehive to get things going. Start by telling them it's a bad idea then watch the meltdowns begin. Ron K0IDT RM-11708 has now come up for d; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00354.html (7,920 bytes)
145. Re: [RTTY] It's spreading (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:31:48 -0600; There's a good disscussion on AMforever http://www.amforever.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&p=2739&sid=d22d796f618082943baa7f1f4cc53542 I posted the link to the RM on several other groups and there seems to; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00356.html (8,249 bytes)
146. Re: [RTTY] It's spreading (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 15:56:55 -0600; Sam, this is the one I'm referring to http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/digitalradio/info Ron K0IDT -- Original Message -- From: "Sam Leslie -- W4PK" <w4pk@arrl.net> To: "'Ron Kolarik'" <rkolarik@ne; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00364.html (9,706 bytes)
147. [RTTY] 2Tone (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:31:43 -0600; I switched 2Tone to be the primary decoder in N1MM, which also makes it the tx primary, and now there's a little chirp at the start of transmission. I noticed a few signals during last weekend having; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00113.html (6,545 bytes)
148. Re: [RTTY] 2Tone (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:30:45 -0600; Thanks Chen. I'll see if I can stretch this out in the time domain and get a look at what's going on in there. It probably won't hurt anything but it is annoying and it will cost precious millisecond; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00115.html (9,114 bytes)
149. Re: [RTTY] 2Tone Chirp (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:34:07 -0600; Thanks for the explanation David. The chirp I hear is probably the ramp up on transmit, I'll look at it when I have more time. 73, Ron K0IDT As you can see I have joined this reflector. The start up; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00118.html (9,750 bytes)
150. Re: [RTTY] RM 11708 Comments (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:59:56 -0600; Like AA6YQ says, wait for the "fat lady", it ain't over until it's over. Ron K0IDT It is rather depressing to see the number of positive comments on the FCC website. I looked at a number of the most; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00131.html (7,789 bytes)
151. Re: [RTTY] Comments on RM-11708 now most active (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:27:31 -0600; The deadline is the 21st, tomorrow, but I don't know if there's an extention due to the weekend. Ron K0IDT -- Original Message -- From: "Peter Laws" <plaws@plaws.net> To: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bell; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00138.html (8,807 bytes)
152. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Comments (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 01:41:44 -0600; Next time compose it offline and either submit a PDF or cut and paste from Word or whatever. Sometimes it's good to sleep on it before you dump a comment in....... Ron K0IDT Yup, my submission made i; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00156.html (7,892 bytes)
153. Re: [RTTY] How to submit a reply to a RM-11708 comment? (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 20:06:00 -0600; I already sent a nastygram to my ARRL director about it. It's the same text as their "clarification" from earlier. Lots of easy points to go after in there. Ron K0IDT ARRL's own "Comments of Petition; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00168.html (9,307 bytes)
154. Re: [RTTY] K0SM comments RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:08:12 -0600; Playing a bit of catch up with the email. Andy's comment was great and caused a few heads to explode on another list, I need to get the duct tape concession over there :) Then there's this http://app; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00188.html (8,664 bytes)
155. Re: [RTTY] Rebuttal comments filed to objections to RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:22:38 -0600; Actually that's the 5th submission of almost the same thing. There's a couple in there where he takes shots at specific individuals then cleans it up, must think it's an eHam forum and he's trolling; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00011.html (10,389 bytes)
156. Re: [RTTY] FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... EMERGENCY NETWORK (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 19:15:48 -0600; What Rick said, next time ask for a call sign. That usually shuts them up or sends them into jamming mode or worse. I was threatened once with FCC action if I didn't move, still waiting.... Ron K0IDT; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00023.html (9,324 bytes)
157. [RTTY] RTTY Roundup K0IDT SOLP (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 01:28:04 -0600; Pretty decent conditions. Nice to see wall to wall signals on 80m for a change and low band noise too. Lost an hour and a half in prime time but catching NA5NN for MS and WAS made up for it a bit. Th; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00028.html (7,308 bytes)
158. Re: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:40:58 -0600; I was sorely tempted to blast him too, he called me otherwise I would have avoided him. Lots of ARRL officials on for the centennial award points, get enough points and you can pay for a cert or plaq; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00161.html (11,381 bytes)
159. Re: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 00:13:58 -0600; How can something that was never presented to ARRL members or hams in general be misunderstood? According to the ARRL it was introduced by only one person and no organization or other entity lobbied; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00175.html (10,317 bytes)
160. Re: [RTTY] Band plan? (Re: FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... (JT65/JT9) (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 19:00:49 -0600; Kai, That link is busted, this one works http://www.ciarc.org/downloads/Digital_Mode_Band_Plan.pdf It references HFLink for most of it's plans, some of their stuff is dated and I have personal reason; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00198.html (11,101 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]