Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rtnmi@sbcglobal.net: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:03:40 -0600
I fellows relatively new mode for me. What do you guys consider the best brand/model radio for RTTY barring cost factor? 73 fer nw, Bob AD5VJ 10X# 37210, FP#-1141, SMIRK#-5177 http://www.n5iet.com/ C
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00327.html (8,698 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:22:29 -0600
So 250hz is the filter size I want to use for RTTY? 73 fer nw, Bob AD5VJ 10X# 37210, FP#-1141, SMIRK#-5177 http://www.n5iet.com/ Code may be taking a back seat for now, but the pioneering spirit that
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00331.html (8,775 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:42:01 -0600
Well, slowly I am catching on here. Ok let me ask you this, now that I have monitored the bands all day and have saved many RTTY frequencies to memory, this being a NA contest I have many local (if y
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00333.html (9,994 bytes)

4. [RTTY] FSK vs AFSK (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:21:38 -0500
I am wanting to use FSK for my RTTY mode and of course AFSK for PSK, ect. Can someone tell me since I have the system set up with MMVARI and MMTTY how I can know for sure that when I switch over to M
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00027.html (7,379 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY] FSK vs AFSK (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:26:36 -0500
Ok got that part. (I think) Now when I switch over to MMTTY I use the RTTY mode on my IC-775. So does that mean that I am sending FSK on the MMTTY? And then I use USB-D when using MMVARI. So then I w
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00029.html (9,795 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] 4U1UN (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:32:40 -0500
Agreed but they don't. That's exactly why dual receive is so important to us all. Art is right if you can get it dual receive is great to have. Personally after having dual receive on my IC-775 and
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00047.html (8,618 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] zl8r (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:35:07 -0500
Thank you for the clarification: He kept saying "up" but never said how far up. So I have been going up all over the place and have noticed others are also in hopes of catching him. I am new to RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00170.html (9,178 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] ZL8R and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:31:45 -0500
Can you believe it. A newbie to RTTY after 40 years of Hamming and I got 'em on 17 mtrs RTTY thanks to reading posts in this group. Thanks guys for the insight and experience your passing along. :0)
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00198.html (9,084 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] JARTS submission prob (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:07:17 -0500
Mine did also. It will work. 73 fer nw es gud DX, QSL VIA LotW Bob AD5VJ(AAR6VM) http://www.ad5vj.com/ Member: CTDXCC, NTCC, STXDXCC FISTS: # 12637 10X# 37210, FP#-1141 SMIRK#-5177, RARS #-149 ______
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00291.html (10,418 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu