Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rtty@contesting.com: 495 ]

Total 495 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:39:19 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) Don AA5AU REPLY: Exactly. For now, I suggest that senders include their email address in their signature unless, of course, they don't want direct replies. 73, Bill
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00200.html (8,872 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:43:23 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) It seems strange that those providers causing the most problems have interests in large advertising supported web based discussion groups 73, ... Joe, W4TV REPLY: J
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00201.html (9,306 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:45:31 -0400
You're blaming email providers for implementing best practices. If yahoo publishes who's allowed to send on their behalf and gmail takes steps to reject email originating from sources claiming to be
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00202.html (10,750 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:49:25 -0700
73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00203.html (8,422 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:48:14 -0400
Oh, and if you notice, I put my email address in both the To and CC of the prior message. The relector obediently (as it should) copied them to the outbound message. This allows you to do a reply all
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00204.html (11,601 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Outside US (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 18:53:13 +0100 (BST)
Many thanks for the helpful comments. After further exploration following Ron K0IDT's advice, I've found the alternative page   http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/display?z=7r93t   Which allows submissi
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00205.html (7,553 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:58:32 -0400
Not such a good idea moving to Yahoo Groups. Their strings are saturated with advertizing posts intertwined every tenth or so posting. And you can't delete 'em either !!! 73 de Phil - N8PS ORIGINAL M
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00206.html (10,464 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:58:39 -0700
I am on several on both google and yahoo, Google is better than neo yahoo. Jay ws7i It seems strange that those providers causing the most problems have interests in large advertising supported web b
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00207.html (10,014 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:10:54 -0400
I disagree ... Google is essentially useless with traditional e-mail while Yahoo works fine (and avoids the advertising). The question is whether this version of Mailman - or a later version - will s
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00208.html (10,883 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:11:59 -0700
There is apparently a setting in a recent version of mailman to address this very issue. Unfortunately contesting.com is not running that version (2.1.16 or 2.1.17). Let's see if we can urge an updat
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00209.html (13,221 bytes)

31. [RTTY] Winlink passing commercial traffic? (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:13:12 -0500
There was a earlier comment about passing commercial traffic across Winlink. Does anyone have any examples of this? Thanks, Terry _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00210.html (7,062 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:16:29 -0400
Web based forums are a blunt instrument when a scalpel is appropriate. With web based forums one is locked into being on-line to participate which may be fine for group based business environments b
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00211.html (11,864 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:40:16 -0500
Bill, Thanks for your efforts. Keep plodding along we will figure it out.. 73 Jim AC0E Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone ORIGINAL MESSAGE:          (may be snipped) REPLY: Yes, I'm well
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00212.html (8,458 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] Winlink passing commercial traffic? (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:43:27 -0700
No because it is impossible for anyone to decode the traffic. Thanks, Terry _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00213.html (7,335 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:57:46 -0400
Id rather live with the bounces than this......Im with Dave, some people I read every one of their emails, some go right in the trash.....there has to be a better way..... ___________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00214.html (8,773 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] Winlink passing commercial traffic? (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:09:56 -0400
Only based on anecdotal information and somewhat tempered by what one considers "commercial" traffic. If one considers ordering fuel/supplies for the yacht for pick-up at the next port of call or mak
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00215.html (8,731 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:16:32 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Apparently there is a solution, described here: http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/DMARC Basically it means updating the Mailman software. I am trying to get i
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00216.html (7,546 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:12:47 -0700
On 4/18/2014 10:06 AM, RTTY wrote: Also, when you reply, it doesn't go directly to the person who originated the message. Instead, it works like a Yahoo Group and is addressed back to the entire grou
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00217.html (8,647 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Outside US (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:00:37 -0500
Related to Rm-11708, why doesn't the country with the most number of licensed hams have even a single Winlink RMS? Just curious if it's the modes involved or the unattended aspect, maybe some of our
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00218.html (7,768 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:04:33 -0500
Bill the fastest way to kill a group is to move it. My 2 cents, Google groups suck and Yahoo groups are still being messed with by management "improvements"......wunderkind CEO. Ron K0IDT ORIGINAL ME
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00219.html (10,578 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu