- 381. Re: [RTTY] For Sale: issues of RTTY Digital Journal (score: 1)
- Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:54:06 -0500
- I have sent Bill a note requesting status of the Journals. Thanks Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org) In a message dated 2/19/2017 12:24:30 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, keepwalking188@ac0c.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00170.html (8,409 bytes)
- 382. Re: [RTTY] For Sale: issues of RTTY Digital Journal (score: 1)
- Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 15:07:00 -0500
- We have also offered to provide hosting of the journal set also as we have the ARTS journals here also and also Bill Henry's History of HAL, Jim Hayne's detail history of early RTTY ,, and more.. But
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00172.html (9,122 bytes)
- 383. Re: [RTTY] Archive for RTTY Journal (score: 1)
- Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:01:50 -0500
- THIS IS WONDERFUL CHEN! A CALIBRATION OF HISTORY INDEED! THANKS TO YOU AND BILL AND ALL INVOLVED AND WE WILL GET THIS POSTED AS A PUBLIC DOWNLOAD TOMORROW -- WE HAVE UNLIMITED BANDWIDTH SO NOT A PROB
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00176.html (8,713 bytes)
- 384. Re: [RTTY] Icom 7300 ? (score: 1)
- Author: Rudy Bakalov via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:51:13 -0500
- 6.2M points this past CQ WPX RTTY weekend and 3.9M points during last year's CQ DX RTTY, for a total of 4,500 QSOs. The radio performed flawlessly in a M/S environment with no interference to and fro
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00180.html (7,416 bytes)
- 385. Re: [RTTY] Icom 7300 ? (score: 1)
- Author: Rudy Bakalov via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 04:47:56 +0000 (UTC)
- Forgot to mention- using N1MM+ and FSK via microHAM MK2R+. For decoding I use simultaneously MMTTY, 2Tone, and GRITTY; don't use the built-in decoder. Rudy N2WQ From: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.co
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00182.html (8,423 bytes)
- 386. Re: [RTTY] Archive for RTTY Journal (score: 1)
- Author: Ed Sharpe via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:51:09 -0500
- OK we are good to go at smecc just have to load we have unlimited bandwidth and a good connection to the backbone.. yes good to have this in several places and I will make sure it shows up in interen
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00186.html (11,106 bytes)
- 387. Re: [RTTY] Archive for RTTY Journal (score: 1)
- Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:51:35 -0500
- Bill - Yes... well actually we have a bunch of extra volumes to trade off too... as the museum built our set we ended up with extras as we went along and combined collections. We still like our colle
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00188.html (9,541 bytes)
- 388. Re: [RTTY] Archive for RTTY Journal (score: 1)
- Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:33:02 -0500
- There you go! be interesting to see how good the ocr is as I am not sure they are 300 dpi images... Ed# In a message dated 2/22/2017 6:14:44 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, K5ROE@roetto.org writes: I
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00189.html (11,844 bytes)
- 389. Re: [RTTY] Archive for RTTY Journal (score: 1)
- Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:40:59 -0500
- Yes I think I see the first 3? ok yes OCR in a text file... but can you set it to generate an ocr file inside of a pdf? high res? this is the most useful for viewing/working/searching. do not know wh
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00190.html (12,080 bytes)
- 390. [RTTY] How many contest RTTY with mechanical teletypes still? (score: 1)
- Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:08:28 -0500
- How many contest RTTY with mechanical teletypes still? Ed# _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00192.html (7,094 bytes)
- 391. [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day (score: 1)
- Author: Tim Goeppinger via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
- I would like to write a letter to QST to hopefully get published by Field Day. My concern is that the North Americanhams have taken a wrong turn about 15 years ago for digital modes for ARRL Field
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00195.html (8,314 bytes)
- 392. Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day (score: 1)
- Author: Ryan Noguchi via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:01:39 +0000 (UTC)
- PSK31 can have an edge over RTTY when operating QRP with portable antennas, like many do on Field Day. But most of these Field Day stations are likely using FLDIGI and therefore could just as easily
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00203.html (9,667 bytes)
- 393. Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK on Field Day (score: 1)
- Author: Ryan Noguchi via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:23:05 +0000 (UTC)
- accurate manual tuning. If one is using an application like Fldigi, like most PSK31 ops on Field Day probably are, they can click on RTTY traces just as easily as with PSK. ... segments are prima
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00204.html (7,953 bytes)
- 394. Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day (score: 1)
- Author: Ryan Noguchi via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:04:34 +0000 (UTC)
- thinks that they need a PSK31 station in order to attract and interest new hams long before they think about a RTTY station. A PSK31 station running Fldigi, as most probably are, transforms into an
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00205.html (8,686 bytes)
- 395. Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day (score: 1)
- Author: Ryan Noguchi via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:31:10 +0000 (UTC)
- Does anyone here have any statistics or even anecdotal observations they could share of the relative number of PSK QSOs vs RTTY QSOs in last year's Field Day? Because what little I've seen by Google
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00209.html (8,857 bytes)
- 396. Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day (score: 1)
- Author: Matthew Pitts via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:56:45 -0500
- I did run both RTTY and PSK31 last year for K8CY on Field Day. Matthew Pitts N8OHU On 2/24/2017 12:31 PM, Ryan Noguchi via RTTY wrote: In my opinion, if the op is experienced enough to know both PSK
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00210.html (9,549 bytes)
- 397. Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day (score: 1)
- Author: Ryan Noguchi via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:49:54 +0000 (UTC)
- Among the 63 contacts the club made, do you recall the split between RTTY and PSK31? Did you observe a lot of mayhem in the PSK watering hole, as some have reported? (Butting in on a QSO in progress
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00213.html (8,729 bytes)
- 398. [RTTY] SOME SMECC MUSEUM ARCHIVED RTTY HISTORY FOR YOU - MANY RESOURCES (score: 1)
- Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:04:58 -0500
- SOME SMECC MUSEUM ARCHIVED RTTY HISTORY FOR YOU! == ARTS - Amateur Radio Teletype Society History and Bulletins A SMECC MUSEUM ARCHIVE PROJECT (PLEASE LINK TO THESE ARTS FILE PAGES - FOR PEOPLE TO RE
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00216.html (16,318 bytes)
- 399. Re: [RTTY] SOME SMECC MUSEUM ARCHIVED RTTY HISTORY FOR YOU - MANY RESOURCES (score: 1)
- Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:03:00 -0500
- Sorry for the messy post... the formatting was not transferred! go to http://www.smecc.org/rtty_ratt_radio_teletype.htm for something that looks nice! I have not added the RTTY Bill Henry Files yet t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00217.html (20,059 bytes)
- 400. Re: [RTTY] Sprints (score: 1)
- Author: "Kermit \(aka Ken\) via RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:32:05 -0400
- Sprinting isn't all that difficult to learn and it is fun. I learned by participating in the Thursday evening RTTY events where the power limit is 100w. So naively I decided to do the contest last Ma
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00029.html (8,173 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu