Mail Archive Search: <+from:ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:ska@bartg.demon.co.uk: 60 ]

Total 60 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] Getting tqsl to sign Cabrillo files (score: 1): Author: John Barber <SKA@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 19:23:18 +0000; I have asked Trey to add the Sprint to the list. John GW4SKA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00043.html (9,406 bytes)
42. Re: [RTTY] Bartg Spring op time? (score: 1): Author: John Barber <SKA@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:04:04 +0000; Jerry, The best place for rules is always the website of the contest sponsor! Try: http://www.bartg.demon.co.uk/Contests/06_rules.htm Cheers, John GW4SKA BARTG Contest Manager _______________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00012.html (7,799 bytes)
43. [RTTY] BARTG Sprint results (score: 1): Author: John Barber <SKA@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 22:38:53 +0000; The results for the 2006 BARTG Sprint have now been finished and will be up on the BARTG website in the next couple of days. If anyone is interested to see their .wlc files to check on lost points pl; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00161.html (6,726 bytes)
44. [RTTY] BARTG HF RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: John Barber <SKA@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:27:46 +0000; Just a reminder that now is the time to sort out the software and logging for the BARTG test this weekend, as some have already been doing. Don't forget that the log must have full exchanges (RST, se; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00216.html (6,849 bytes)
45. [RTTY] MMTTY and the BARTG HF RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: John Barber <SKA@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 22:47:39 +0000; There is a possible problem with the logs produced by MMTTY. If your log shows a - between the sent serial number and sent time ... so it looks like 599 001-0205 ... you need to replace those dashes; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00225.html (6,741 bytes)
46. [RTTY] BARTG RTTY logs (score: 1): Author: John Barber <SKA@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:47:27 +0000; Thanks to all who have sent logs for the BARTG HF RTTY Contest. All the mail received has been acknowledged. Please keep them coming in. For the next week I shall be away from computers and radios, o; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00304.html (6,944 bytes)
47. [RTTY] Self spotting (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 18:07:57 -0000; It seems that we have many opinions about the validity of spotting and use of the clusters. Does it really make much difference? The top contesters are not wasting time with tricks like self-spotting; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00015.html (7,594 bytes)
48. [RTTY] BARTG Sprint contest results (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:33:03 -0000; Look out for the BARTG Sprint results on our website. They are with the webmaster and will be up very soon. Thanks to all who took part; see you in the BARTG HF contest in 2 weeks time. John GW4SKA B; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00010.html (6,337 bytes)
49. [RTTY] BARTG HF RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:15:58 -0000; Just a reminder about the BARTG test this weekend, a few notes and a request for help. The rules are on the BARTG website. Please have a look, but more important is to check that your log will be in; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00071.html (7,738 bytes)
50. [RTTY] BARTG N1MM logs (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:11:09 -0000; Thanks to all who posted sample logs. They all look fine apart from the log from Greg N6CK which is missing a time column. Same software version so why the difference? Cheers, John GW4SKA ___________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00084.html (6,500 bytes)
51. [RTTY] BARTG Contest rules (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:54:27 -0000; There are no limits on power or use of the cluster in the BARTG HF RTTY contest. If band conditions are as bad everywhere as they are in Wales right now we need all the help we can get! 73, John GW4S; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00105.html (6,289 bytes)
52. [RTTY] BARTG HF RTTY results (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:08:49 +0100; The results for the BARTG HF RTTY Contest are now up at: http://www.bartg.org.uk/contests/hfres2007.pdf See you all next year, John GW4SKA BARTG Contest Manager ______________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00109.html (6,298 bytes)
53. [RTTY] Fw: 2008 BARTG contests (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:03:21 -0000; Attached are the rules for the BARTG 2008 RTTY contests. Please note that from 2008 the HF RTTY contest in March will run one week later than in previous years. This is to avoid a clash with the Russ; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-11/msg00158.html (6,582 bytes)
54. [RTTY] BARTG 2008 Contests (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:34:00 -0000; The wrong mail got sent to the reflector with the rules attached .. user error ......... Rules for the BARTG Sprint and BARTG HF RTTY contests are now up on the website www.bartg.org.uk The only chan; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-11/msg00161.html (6,531 bytes)
55. Re: [RTTY] Contest Ethics (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 18:49:14 -0000; Fabi, I changed my mind on this question a few years ago. For many years I would take part in the tests and only use my log for checking. Recently, partly due to the lack of competitive G stations in; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-11/msg00212.html (10,046 bytes)
56. Re: [RTTY] Does BARTG sprint send a log acknowledgement? (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:31:41 -0000; What's all this robot stuff? It's just me. I get home, turn on the PC and download the mail. That's when the acknowledgements go out. Then the dog goes out ......... Cheers, John GW4SKA _____________; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00359.html (9,124 bytes)
57. [RTTY] BARTG Sprint results (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:46:23 -0500; The results of the 2008 BARTG Sprint contest are now online: http://www.bartg.org.uk/contests/Sprint2008results.pdf Just one little request for all of you who enter the BARTG HF RTTY Contest on 22nd; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00008.html (6,773 bytes)
58. [RTTY] BARTG HF RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:02:58 -0500; Only a few hours to go so 2 quick reminders. 1) Make sure you have the right contest set up in your software .. NOT the BARTG Sprint 2) Please include your class in the e-mail header when sending you; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00196.html (6,487 bytes)
59. Re: [RTTY] BARTG exch, and 599 (or not) (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:57:02 -0500; Phil and all, We are not being too pedantic. Keith GU6EFB has it exactly right; if the full exchange is not made and logged it is not a valid contact. Yes, the RST is a total waste of time in any con; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00257.html (9,439 bytes)
60. Re: [RTTY] BARTG exch, and 599 (or not) (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:09:26 -0500; The A + B or A + B + C point is well made and the rules could be confusing to first-timers. They will be changed before the 2009 contest. There may be a few extras next year ... to celebrate 50 years; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00262.html (13,788 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3]