Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ska@bartg.org.uk: 176 ]

Total 176 documents matching your query.

121. [RTTY] Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:52:10 -0500
Can I ask that everyone puts their callsign up by their name? When you get to my age a callsign takes up less memory, my storage is getting full and I am already deleting infrequently used data from
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00202.html (7,738 bytes)

122. Re: [RTTY] Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:24:06 -0500
Thanks Lee. I like to see a name and call .. a domain could be used by anyone John GW4SKA My callsign is in my e-mail address. But I can always do it the way you do. John GW4SKA <ska@bartg.org.uk> wr
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00222.html (8,563 bytes)

123. Re: [RTTY] Windows XP and N1MM and serial port FSK (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:26:29 -0500
Exactly the same here but quite normal. I just switch the radio off while the computer fires up John GW4SKA Is anyone experiencing their rig keying up several times when starting up Win XP? And then
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00223.html (8,477 bytes)

124. Re: [RTTY] 2013 Roundup Results (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:05:15 +0100
-- Original Message -- From: "Mark" <n2qt@yahoo.com> I assume the NILs are pure errors on my part, wish I knew what I did as they always seem to be the majority of my errors. I don't track uniques as
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00062.html (8,559 bytes)

125. [RTTY] Not in log errors (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:55:14 +0100
That's good advice and should be part of normal good operating. It doesn't help when in run mode though. My CQ gets answered by W1XYZ, I send 'W1XYZ 599 001 001 ' and most times the response will be
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00065.html (12,957 bytes)

126. Re: [RTTY] Not in log errors (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:25:45 +0100
Perhaps it's time that contest sponsors require *both* calls as part of the exchange. 73, ... Joe, W4TV That would be good as long as it was enforced. We already have some of the high scoring statio
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00083.html (8,450 bytes)

127. [RTTY] Roy Davenpoprt G3IQI (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 10:18:04 +0100
I have the sad news that Roy Davenport G3IQI passed away last Thursday. It was very sudden but not totally unexpected. Roy was a BARTG member and keen RTTY and AMTOR operator, most well known for the
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00000.html (6,039 bytes)

128. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 20:14:29 +0100
Interesting thread but why has it taken so long to do what should have been done first; ask the contest management? Rather than debate this, I sent an email asking for confirmation that the rule chan
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00049.html (15,216 bytes)

129. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 19:46:25 +0100
It's nice that they are talking and trying to fix any ambiguity. I don't think the suggested change works though. It reads: *_New Rule 2.2:_ Operating Time will be calculated using the elapsed time b
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00060.html (18,670 bytes)

130. Re: [RTTY] digital signal on 14240 (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 16:19:54 +0100
It's peaking S9+10 here in Wales. Bearing is around 90 degrees. Direction of Russia ... John GW4SKA Hello Does anyone on the list copy this digital signal on 14240 +/- ? It is RTTY like with a 240hz
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00020.html (7,662 bytes)

131. Re: [RTTY] digital signal on 14240 (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 21:42:28 +0100
Tom, Kai, I have been checking this over a few hours. There is some rapid QSB but the signal is peaking +15 now. The bearing could be a bit further North but definitely between 80 and 90 degrees from
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00022.html (10,026 bytes)

132. Re: [RTTY] BARTG 75 Baud Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 15:28:44 +0100
I've used magnetic reed switches for discreet switching while keeping the appearance standard. They work fine inside the case with a small button or bar magnet outside. Never had a problem with steel
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00047.html (9,153 bytes)

133. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:50:27 +0100
Stan, You must have been unlucky with the guys you worked. Every one of my 1600+ contacts got a 'TU' and I saw lots send the same to me. There are still a lot of courteous RTTY ops out there! Cheers,
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00197.html (9,730 bytes)

134. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:06:30 +0100
Run macro 'TU GW4SKA QRZ' ... quicker than 'QSL GW4SKA QRZ' ! Cheers, John GW4SKA I noticed that no one added TU to their QSOs. I guess a simple "thank you" would take almost half a second too long.
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00005.html (8,374 bytes)

135. [RTTY] 3DA0ET Swaziland RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:57:37 +0100
In November our Swaziland dxpedition is taking place. Unlike some trips, we are making a big effort with RTTY right from the start. John GW4SKA and Chris G8APB will be heading the RTTY operation with
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00135.html (6,728 bytes)

136. [RTTY] N1MM and TS590S (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 11:50:27 +0100
Was hoping to try out a new TS590S in the JARTS with N1MM. Connection is via USB cable only. I have been through all the set-up, have radio control and the radio switches to TX but no tones. MMTTY wo
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00253.html (6,538 bytes)

137. Re: [RTTY] Clipped calls (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:26:28 -0500
On the other hand, if there is a short break between your end returning to receive and the other station starting TX, make sure you are not using AFC. It can drift off and take a character or two to
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00056.html (9,958 bytes)

138. Re: [RTTY] AFC solved (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:54:57 -0500
That seems like 2 recent 'problem' threads down to AFC from 2 very experienced ops who know how to tune to a signal. Maybe it's time to avoid the accidental use of AFC by turning it off after every e
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00064.html (8,691 bytes)

139. Re: [RTTY] FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:32:27 -0500
Hi Stan, BTW, I operate multiple modes, including, (gasp) SSB (but not Pactor). I also wonder when the contests will start including the other digital modes or will it always be just SSB, CW and RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00064.html (14,391 bytes)

140. Re: [RTTY] FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:42:38 -0500
RTTY is basically a contest-only mode. Check the RTTY subbands during the week sometime. They are vast wastelands, even 20m. Then check the PSK and JT65 frequencies - there is always something going
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00196.html (9,780 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu