Mail Archive Search: <+from:ska@bartg.org.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:ska@bartg.org.uk: 176 ]

Total 176 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [RTTY] Ionospheric Physics (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 18:19:32 -0500; Shelby, I support what you say completely. This subject of delayed response has come up before and I have seen all the arguments from multi-radio stations. I don't have a problem with SO2R/SO3R opera; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00197.html (12,011 bytes)
142. [RTTY] 2013 BARTG Sprint results posted (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:57:05 -0500; and the Experts list has been updated. I understand that the BARTG HF results are with the webmaster and will be up very soon. John GW4SKA All, The 2013 BARTG Sprint Results are at: http://www.bartg.; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00291.html (7,992 bytes)
143. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Contests (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 04:51:48 -0500; Hi Bob, Please mail me direct to ska@bartg.org.uk .. my mail to you bounces BARTG are checking your contest entries. If there is a mistake we will correct it but I need a good email address to contac; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00333.html (9,851 bytes)
144. Re: [RTTY] BARTG This Weekend. (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:52:26 -0500; A perfect answer! BARTG rules have no power limits and you can use spots. John GW4SKA If it's not in the rules, then it is not a rule! Al AB2ZY ________________________________________ From: RTTY [rt; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00337.html (10,385 bytes)
145. [RTTY] BARTG Sprint logs (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:16:15 -0500; Thanks to everyone who took part in the Sprint. Please send your logs to logs@bartg.org.uk with your callsign and entry class in the header. All logs are stored on a secure server. You will receive a; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00357.html (6,935 bytes)
146. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:29:15 -0500; Yes there have been some bad things happen. It has happened on all modes. It only takes a few idiots to cause these problems. This is the first day of FT5ZM on RTTY and they are currently working spl; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00014.html (9,415 bytes)
147. Re: [RTTY] Thanks for the Q's (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:49:31 -0500; Steve, Thanks for all the contacts in the test. No need to worry about the new ops ... I thought you were all rubbish :-) Cheers, John GW4SKA Everyone, I want to thank everyone for the Q's this past; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00206.html (8,570 bytes)
148. [RTTY] New technologies (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:12:20 -0500; Bob, The issues for me, rightly or wrongly, are: 1) I don't trust facebook with all the data they hold 2) I don't have time for all the rubbish that comes to me. Why would I want to know when a frie; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00288.html (7,422 bytes)
149. Re: [RTTY] New technologies (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:05:34 -0500; Sorry Jerry. You are quite right, of course. I'll stay here and shut up :-) 73 John GW4SKA -- Original Message -- From: "Jerry, N9AW" <n9aw@sbcglobal.net> To: <rtty@contesting.com> Cc: <k0rc@citlink.; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00292.html (9,592 bytes)
150. Re: [RTTY] BARTG contest (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 14:58:46 -0500; 10 metres has been good here in the first half of the morning then again later this afternoon .. all 6 continents and some very good signals from the US. Maybe activity a bit down but the propagation; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00109.html (8,527 bytes)
151. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 75 April 27th (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:10:46 +0100; We will look at changing the contest weekend now that the RDXC has got so big. We did look at this a couple of years ago and had some discussion here. The general opinion then was not to move. The pr; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00098.html (9,896 bytes)
152. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 75 April 27th (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:17:04 +0100; Jim, It's a function of the Cabrillo format. Each column of data is defined as starting at a specific line position, not just following on a few spaces after the previous data. All the most common lo; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00099.html (8,921 bytes)
153. Re: [RTTY] This is why you are having trouble with the reflector (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:18:04 +0100; Can someone explain what, if anything, I can do to avoid this problem in the future? I have read the posts and looked at other information on the internet. My mail address is not Yahoo, Hotmail etc.; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00167.html (10,909 bytes)
154. Re: [RTTY] This is why you are having trouble with the reflector (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:38:54 +0100; Al, Many thanks for the explanation. I now understand the problem and what is happening. Exactly what was needed after I spent over an hour reading all sorts of info this morning ... and got more and; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00175.html (16,758 bytes)
155. Re: [RTTY] Good news on bounce problem (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:37:38 +0100; Outlook Express does the right thing; reply to sender only or reply all to the list. 73, John GW4SKA -- Original Message -- From: "Jim N7US" <jim@n7us.net> To: "'Bill Turner'" <dezrat1242@wildblue.ne; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00280.html (10,913 bytes)
156. Re: [RTTY] Goodbye fellows (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:45:01 +0100; Joe and others, Hang in there. I feel the same way .. nothing but posts about the ARRL and FCC and not even in my country ... BUT the situation with RM-11708 affects every RTTY operator. So keep usin; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00125.html (9,781 bytes)
157. Re: [RTTY] How can we recrut new comments to the FCC site? (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:40:15 +0100; It's an issue that affects all RTTY ops but those of us outside the US can't file anything to the FCC .. I tried! Cheers, John GW4SKA -- Original Message -- From: "Terry" <ab5k@hotmail.com> To: "'RTT; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00143.html (9,137 bytes)
158. Re: [RTTY] 2 tone vs MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:02:29 +0100; I have been running MMTTY and 2Tone side by side in contests for a while. Using the standard profiles/setups, 2Tone has consistently out-performed MMTTY on 10/15/20M. Often a misprinted word on MMTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00156.html (8,944 bytes)
159. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY, permanently disable AFC (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:59:06 +0100; Tim, If it's wandering off '100s of Hz' you haven't got it set up correctly. Just follow the good advice from Joe and others, set it up the way you need and you will find it works fine. It is useful; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00237.html (11,460 bytes)
160. Re: [RTTY] Dealing with High-Pitched Background Noise? (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 10:37:56 +0100; You've had the best advice going from Bill and Jeff. One thing to add; don't waste a minute trying to use a simple external amplifier and tone control. You are only hearing a very narrow portion of t; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00124.html (9,643 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]