Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@nr4m.com: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

21. [RTTY] Wood in the mail (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:23:03 -0400
Hello all, Pleasantly surprise in today's mail. Received a plaque for the 2013 CQWW RTTY CONTEST. Mult-multi winner for North America @9.8 million points. Congrats to the NR4M RTTY team of G2YL, K3AD
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00196.html (7,278 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Steve NR4M <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:58:18 +0000
Hello all, I should be so lucky! Right now, I have ZERO stations capable of getting on the air. Trying like heck to get my station re-do, from over the summer, done in time. K7SV and I are finishing
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00057.html (8,481 bytes)

23. [RTTY] Fwd: RTTY WPX NR4M M/U HP (score: 1)
Author: Steve NR4M <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:47:30 +0000
CQ WW RTTY WPX Contest Call: NR4M Operator(s): NR4M G2YL K3UI K4EC K4MIL K7SV KA4RRU KK4RTF KB4EDU N3ZV KC4DV ND3N KS4Q K4GMH K4GM Station: NR4M Class: M/U HP QTH: VA Operating Time (hrs): 48 Summary
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00087.html (8,905 bytes)

24. [RTTY] Fwd: Correction to NR4M results (score: 1)
Author: Steve NR4M <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:32:13 +0000
Hello all, As was pointed out to me, working my first EU at '1173 UTC' is /really/ a bad time! The real time was 1153 UTC. It was just a typo and was not because of the time problems I had early in t
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00094.html (6,996 bytes)

25. [RTTY] Thanks (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:19:17 +0000
Hello all, Just want to say 'thanks' to everyone for their participation in the contest this past weekend. The thanks really goes beyond just participation, it is also to the contest management for m
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00132.html (7,012 bytes)

26. [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY from NR4M (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:06:19 -0500
CQ WW RTTY WPX Contest Call: NR4M Operator(s): W3TB NR4C K7SV NR4M N7TY K4EC K4GM K4MIL W4IM KK4RTF N4DXS W1IE KS4Q Station: NR4M Class: M/U HP QTH: VA Operating Time (hrs): 46:46 Summary: Band QSOs
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00103.html (7,576 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY from NR4M (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:36:01 -0500
Hello Bill, To add a bit of context. Two of my 190 foot towers are spaced 300 feet apart and intentionally set on an azimuth of 45 degrees. On a catenary rope strung between them at the top, I have a
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00107.html (8,576 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] My FT-950's RTTY power level admonition (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:35:12 -0500
Hello all, Yea, I worked a couple, and at the time, I was thinking how painful it must be on their end. We need to find them and 'show them the light'. 73 de Steve, NR4M 73, Ed W0YK On Feb 16, 2016 1
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00155.html (10,603 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:03:33 -0500
Ya know, Bill, if you don't send ANYTHING, you can save the whole weekend... 73 de Steve, NR4M I don't think the miniscule speed decrease is a factor. REPLY: You might be surprised. If you send 5NN 2
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00195.html (9,889 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] Dayton Hamvention RTTY Contest Forum (score: 1)
Author: Steve NR4M <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:15:48 -0500
If I might add one... 'Someone' once told me years ago, to not let anyone pass your freq without hearing you send something. Point being, if your equipment can stand it, make -unnecessary- silence so
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00187.html (11,791 bytes)

31. [RTTY] Wood in the mail (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 17:09:32 -0400
Hello all, Want to say 'thanks' to Fred Dennin, WW4LL, who sponsored the High North America plaque for the 2015 CW WPX RTTY contest this past February. Nice looking plaque and I, and the 'guys' do ap
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00045.html (6,746 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] Q Rate Killers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:56:06 -0400
If you can be loud, then you can send less stuff. Unfortunately, not everyone can be loud all the time. I start with one of each exchange element and if it's noisy and I'm getting a bunch or requests
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00088.html (10,561 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] Q Rate Killers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 22:22:54 -0400
Art, It would depend upon how well your station plays (loud). If condx are good, and you have a good path to where your target DX is, then maybe just 'his call', 'state' and 'zone', without your call
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00091.html (13,467 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] Q Rate Killers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:19:20 -0400
Guys, A real example of 'changing as needed' happened this weekend. The big European antenna developed a high SWR, so we had to use a less than optimum antenna. (We destroyed a lightning arrestor wit
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00096.html (15,237 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] Rate killer/QRP (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:06:52 -0400
I tried to help out here. I had SIX 'newbies' here on Saturday. It didn't help the rate to play teacher, but in the long term, it may help provide some operators. Steve like to see us be more inclusi
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00118.html (8,442 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] New amplifier announced (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:25:08 -0400
I had 'panache' once, while in the Navy, but penicillin cleared it up. 73 de Steve, NR4M 73 Neal Campbell Abroham Neal LLC Will the new OM2000A+ from Array Solutions handle 1500W in RTTY contests? It
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00278.html (10,684 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] greater than 600 watts for RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:56:27 -0400
I do about 1200 watts out. 300 watts doesn't matter and RTTY is awfully hard on all the things that make up a station. 73 de Steve, NR4M _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing l
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00062.html (9,018 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] One Pet Peeve (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:11:22 -0400
All good comments. I try to be loud, but I guess we all do. I think anyone with a bit of experience can tell if they're reasonably loud, or not. If I'm loud, I will send it ONCE. If I change bands or
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-07/msg00020.html (10,140 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] One Pet Peeve (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:40:08 -0400
Really? I operate by the 'norm', on a freq which I am currently 'borrowing', the other op is coming to me with his 'operating weirdness' and you're making me sound like the villain. From my perspecti
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-07/msg00023.html (11,375 bytes)

40. [RTTY] Plaque sponsorship (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 07:59:36 -0400
Hello Kevin, Steve, NR4M, here. Thank you for your sponsorship of the 2016 CQWW RTTY, North America, Multi Unlimited plaque. I, and the 'Rappackers', appreciate your support of this contest. Although
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-08/msg00000.html (6,114 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu