Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:thomasfgiella@verizon.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] QRV RTTY ON 50.300 RIGHT NOW (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas F. Giella NZ4O" <thomasfgiella@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:31:44 -0400
I'm on 50300 kc at 2030 UTC. 73 & GUD DX, Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O Lakeland, FL, USA nz4o@arrl.net NZ4O Amateur & SWL Autobiography: http://www.nz4o.org NZ4O Solar Space Weather & Geomagnetic Data Arch
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00044.html (8,874 bytes)

2. [RTTY] QRV RTTY ON 50.300 RIGHT NOW (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas F. Giella NZ4O" <thomasfgiella@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:41:53 -0400
I'm on 50.300 kc at 0040 UTC. 73, Thomas NZ4O -- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 110710-1, 07/10/2011 Tested on: 7/10/2011 8:42:03 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00049.html (9,904 bytes)

3. [RTTY] Self Spotting question (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas F. Giella NZ4O" <thomasfgiella@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:47:17 -0400
Self spotting is an acceptable practice on all of the other digital modes. I personally don't do it because you end up with a large pileup of rude hams that call incessantly and never listen. 73 & GU
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00058.html (7,783 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Self spotting question (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas F. Giella NZ4O" <thomasfgiella@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:24:51 -0400
My guess is that the use of AFSK is pretty even with FSK now. I use AFSK cleanly but like Jim W7RY I see many overdriven AFSK RTTY signals on the bands, similar to what I see with PSK31. When you try
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00061.html (14,046 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu