Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:v49a@yahoo.com: 172 ]

Total 172 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:10:26 -0800 (PST)
This is 100 percent correct, Shelby. That's why it is neccessary to create SO Assisted Group for those, who uses Packet (I beleive 80-90% guys are using Packet/DX Cluster these days, anyway) The Sing
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00102.html (9,420 bytes)

62. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:14:40 -0800 (PST)
This is all correct, EXCEPT THIS: 3.2.2. Stations are allowed only one transmitted signal at any given time.. (This is only for Multy Stations.) Subparagraph 3.2.2 applies to this: 3.2. Multioperator
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00108.html (10,302 bytes)

63. Re: [RTTY] new callsign (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:02:54 -0800 (PST)
Robert, Pick TF3TTY - this would be my choice. 73's Andrei EW1AR-NC2N Here in iceland we can have a 3 letter callsign now. As I am usually always on rtty my favorite mode, I was wondering about a new
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00124.html (8,311 bytes)

64. Re: [RTTY] new callsign (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:03:10 -0800 (PST)
Robert, Pick TF3TTY - this would be my choice. 73's Andrei EW1AR-NC2N Here in iceland we can have a 3 letter callsign now. As I am usually always on rtty my favorite mode, I was wondering about a new
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00125.html (8,304 bytes)

65. Re: [RTTY] new callsign (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:50:41 -0800 (PST)
P5TTY would be a Winner! DJ3IW Goetz <goetzlin@t-online.de> wrote: 7O1TTY would be a good one too. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00135.html (8,530 bytes)

66. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:15:45 -0800 (PST)
Rich and everyone: Let's put it in this way: 1.RTTY RU is a popular RTTY Contest and can get way More participants. However: 2. The Rules are not clear, they need to be revised. (I do not want to rea
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00140.html (16,813 bytes)

67. Re: [RTTY] UK DX and BARTG same weekend? (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:46:43 -0800 (PST)
Peter: Forget about UK DX - this gotta be a typo. Besides, UK DX's Web Page seems to be down. Actually, the whole Contest menu is down for a while. Anyway BARTG is OK. 73's Andre EW1AR-NC2N -- Peter
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00143.html (7,520 bytes)

68. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:02:35 -0800 (PST)
OK, forget about 30 hours operatons time, SO2R etc.. Here is two questions: 1. If I am operating in Single Operator Entry - Can I use more than one (two, three, four or more Transmitters "at any give
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00153.html (11,469 bytes)

69. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RU band change question (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:07:37 -0800 (PST)
I would like add that all Numbers beginning from 3.2.1 and up, Do apply to paragraph 3.2 and do not apply to paragraph 3.1, ok. Hugh, now is all clear for me:) 73's Andrei EW1AR-NC2N David Hachadoria
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00154.html (9,405 bytes)

70. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RU band change question (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:12:04 -0800 (PST)
No where in 3.1 I see transmitting signals (at any given time) limitation, as well. 73's Andrei EW1AR-NC2N Not sure where that reasoning came from? The rules under 3.1 refer to Single Operator, and u
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00155.html (8,200 bytes)

71. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules/Less thanPerfect (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:29:04 -0800 (PST)
Imagine, I read ONLY RTTY RU Rules, and did not read the General Rules by any reason? I work RTTY only, sorry and do not suspect, that this Contest has another Rules trascription somewhere. I read th
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00161.html (12,584 bytes)

72. Re: [RTTY] Cabrillo file for the OK Contest (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:20:38 -0800 (PST)
Hello Phil and all, I have the same problem here, exactly the same "Toggle... But my friend K2PAL had no problem, he also uses WL. Do I have to use adif converter? 73's Andrei EW1AR-NC2N Just a quick
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00176.html (7,962 bytes)

73. Re: [RTTY] Did OK accept Cabrillo last year? (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:24:29 -0800 (PST)
I have just opened up Year 2004 OK RTTY Writelog. I went to Cabrillo File - no problem, it was opened right away. Then I went to File open and opened 2005 OK RTTY - I got the same "Toggle" thing... W
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00181.html (8,276 bytes)

74. Re: [RTTY] new FIX for cabrillo problem OK-RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:30:35 -0800 (PST)
Well, I will be waiting for your instructions. I think, that last year we did not have this problem, using older version of Writelog. (before 10.50) This *bug* appeared in the latest versions. 73's A
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00187.html (9,637 bytes)

75. Re: [WriteLog] [RTTY] new FIX for cabrillo problem OK-RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:09:17 -0800 (PST)
Woops, I downloaded DC3HB's *ok_empty.wl* stuff, imported there my OK RTTYADIF file and.. I have the same score points without changing ini.file! And I do have a Cabrillo file. 73's Andrei EW1AR-NC2N
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00190.html (10,037 bytes)

76. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:36:16 -0800 (PST)
One operator with Two Radios does a difference. According to AA5AU, the increase of points is 40 percents if you are using two Radios. AA5AU said that three Radios is tough already, so I am doubt if
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00193.html (10,336 bytes)

77. Re: [RTTY] OK DX RTTY Cabrillo file workaround for WL users (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:09:13 -0800 (PST)
My case was OK, I just punished myself. Being unpatient, I did not wait from Don and Bernd and just replaced Zone 14 with Zone 5 Mannually. WEll, it took me thirty minutes for 400 QSO's, no big deal,
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00206.html (8,849 bytes)

78. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:43:03 -0800 (PST)
I think, that everything was already discussed and many guys want the Rules to be revised, edited, etc. They are far from to be perfect. Well, nothing is perfect. If they need to be updated - they mu
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00209.html (14,231 bytes)

79. Re: [RTTY] Our turn at a poll (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:40:13 -0800 (PST)
Rick Mintz <Rmintz@Rochester.rr.com> wrote: The end of the year always lets loose the pollsters for silliness such as "Person of the Year", "Product of the Year", etc. I think that it is our turn, so
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00211.html (7,909 bytes)

80. Re: [RTTY] Our turn at a poll (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 05:05:23 -0800 (PST)
MMTTY seems to be a WINNER. 73's Andrei EW1AR-NC2N The end of the year always lets loose the pollsters for silliness such as "Person of the Year", "Product of the Year", etc. I think that it is our t
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00226.html (9,434 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu