Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:vs_otw@rogers.com: 83 ]

Total 83 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] SPAM (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:18:25 -0600
Heinz, Same here, but just from time to time, not always. Besides the RTTY list, I also have the same doubling with some of other (Yahoo) lists. 73, Vladimir VE3IAE -- _______________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-11/msg00121.html (7,014 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] IC-756 (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:46:37 -0600
Noel, I used to use the IC-756 for RTTY extensively. I did well, indeed. As I do all kinds of contesting, CW/SSB/RTTY, I have installed 2 x 250 Hz CW filters. The IC-756 allows to "fool" itself aroun
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-11/msg00253.html (8,135 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] 150 million qsos (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:21:10 -0600
If you have merged "paper" and LoTW accounts, there are two options to trace your records. The "Award Credit Matrix" gives you the complete matrix for your merged DXCC account. Then, if follow the "D
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00155.html (8,952 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] DXCC RTTY via LotW (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:14:03 -0600
Laurent, You can go to your LoTW User page at the LoTW Web site, then go to Your QSOs / Download Report. The report, being an .ADI file, contains LoTW confirmations, only. You can import it either in
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00339.html (9,145 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] FMRE (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:34:46 -0600
Just back from a trip, checking mail accumulated. There is the following msg dated Feb.11: TNX FOR LOG XE1J . 73, Vladimir VE3IAE -- Is someone received e-mail confirmation from Jose Levy, XE1J Direc
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00245.html (7,287 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] ANARTS Macros (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:33:40 -0400
To make a long story short, the string of dots is waste of time. The longer the string is, the more time is wasted for the both parties. Normally the "CQ DX" means a call to stations in other contin
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-06/msg00082.html (8,179 bytes)

27. [RTTY] VE3IAE ANARTS (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:29:25 -0400
ANARTS WW RTTY Contest Call: VE3IAE Operator(s): VE3IAE Station: VE3IAE Class: SOST LP QTH: Operating Time (hrs): Summary: Band QSOs Pts Mults -- 80: 40: 66 20: 104 15: 10 10: -- Total: 180 1620 67 C
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-06/msg00105.html (7,478 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] some interesting stats (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:19:36 -0400
There is quite a lot of statistics like that. To make the long story short: - NA LoTW users have approx. 30% confirmation rate - non-NA users have approx. 15% confirmation rate. The best LoTW QSLers
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-06/msg00148.html (8,801 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] Computer Sound Card (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir V. Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 15:24:16 +0100
Dick, As long as you build the PC yourself, I'd also recommend you to extend your list of topics and to look for a good RF-free power supply. Been there, done that. Birdies across several bands and w
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-07/msg00010.html (8,018 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] Odd exchanges in NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir V. Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:01:00 +0100
The MOST confusing would be AL AL DE WnXX where the first Al is ther name and the 2nd AL is the state... You may read it whatever you wish, Al in Alabama or Al in Delaware... :-) On a seruious note,
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-07/msg00097.html (8,014 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] 2 x 4 Call Signs? (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:01:06 -0400
Longer lenght suffixes for special event calls have been approved by the ITU lately. SY7ISDE was kinda beacon here in VE3 throughout the contest. The fill QSLing data are in qrz.com. Briefly, Bureau
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-08/msg00055.html (7,968 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] EU1SA, AA6YQ profiles in MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:14:57 -0500
Dave, As I am quite familiar with the profile (see my signature), let me add a couple of words to the discussion. The "EU1SA" profile is mostly not about decoding, but first of all, it's about extra
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00519.html (9,512 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:51:10 -0500
A good idea, indeed. Besides the no-no for a macro repeating a received exchange back, I for one would also beg the software authors to never assign a F key for the QSO B4 message by default... If th
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00261.html (9,292 bytes)

34. [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:44:31 -0400
Gents, Please be more careful with what we already have by now, i.e the 45 Baud RTTY. This mode is very well established and popular. Moreover, it sits firmly in some radios' hardware. Now that there
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00297.html (8,657 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] W6WRT is correct... (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:24:07 -0400
Dan, Let me be the 2nd in that. Leaving the list is easy, but if you do, you will miss enormous amount of information. John GW4SKA has just mentionned some people. Don Hill has recently received the
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00329.html (12,660 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:14:41 -0500
Quite a suprising reading of QRZ... I for one always suggested like this. If I finish a QSO and immidiately after Bye-Bye I start calling, CQ, it would sound just rough and unpollite. Just like I wou
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00246.html (8,750 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:11:09 -0500
Ray, A good point, indeed. For this very purpose my usual macro is: TU N6HE 73 DE VE3IAE QRZ or TU N6HE 73<CR> DE VE3IAE QRZ. "73" is yet another confirmation if you eventually miss the TU in sometim
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00279.html (10,217 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] Why send 599 report (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:27:00 -0500
Bill, With due respect... - How do you know about "most folks"? Was there any poll on that or what? - I for one truly support the 599 as a part of exchange. As a matter of fact it is meaningless as a
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00486.html (10,345 bytes)

39. [RTTY] HA: Fwd: EA RTTY AA5VU SOAB HP (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:42:55 -0400
My log has also been bounced. Perhaps our Spanish friends will comment on that. 73, Vladimir VE3IAE -- -- -- Anthony J. Cioffi I did not have any trouble submitting my log. However, I did not receive
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00031.html (9,332 bytes)

40. [RTTY] HA: Bounced Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 19:53:12 -0400
I have just sent my log again and this time it was also accepted. It looks like the robot is back to life (errr... eh?) 73, Vladimir VE3IAE -- -- -- Bill, W6WRT ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 1
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00039.html (8,867 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu