- 81. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY Strange display (score: 1)
- Author: "V Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 21:00:27 -0500
- Pretty much same here, at least once for sure. I don't recall precise details, though I think, my call-sign sent twice was broken in parts in one of the instances, like VE 3IAE VE3IAE. Indeed, it has
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-01/msg00030.html (8,965 bytes)
- 82. Re: [RTTY] CQ WW WPX RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "V Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:54:12 -0500
- There might be another challenge, catching VE/VA prefixes in this WPX... Canada is 150 years young this year. Therefore Canadians may sign CG instead of VE and CF i/o VA the whole year 2017. See you
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00026.html (8,159 bytes)
- 83. Re: [RTTY] New Radio (score: 1)
- Author: "V Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 13:18:51 -0400
- think any of the other 100 watt radios have this rating. All Icoms do 100% duty cycle in RTTY, including 200W ones and the IC-PW1 1KW solid state PA. 73, Vlad VE3TM -- ______________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00086.html (10,215 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu