There once was a list of good sound cards out. I'm thinking I first saw it on the yahoo digitalradio list that are really good for ham use. As one person once said "a 15 dollar wal mart sound card wi
Yes please. Is it to much to add you call to your name when you sign a post. John, W0JAB _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
Oh come on Peter. Are you going to make a ham who happens at the time to be at sea use a commercial service just to let friends and family know where he is at? He's a ham got God's shakes. Dont put a
Yes. Winlink 2000/SailMail/SCS Technologies are commercial users against whom there has been no FCC enforcement because they operate with the protection of certain individuals and special interests a
Much of the traffic handled by Winlink 2000/Sailmail networks is entirely commercial in nature and it passes without any system operator review. 73, ... Joe, W4TV Show some text of some on the ham b
Much of the traffic handled by Winlink 2000/Sailmail networks is entirely commercial in nature and it passes without any system operator review. One is for ham use the other (sailmail) if for commerc
It seems that some will not be happy till the bandwidth is that of ESP. They bad talk RTTY, PACTOR and on and on. John, W0JAB _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co
This was tried already by the "auto sub" band. But it did not work because the auto stations still got "heat" from a few that would enter that sub band to have their "live" QSO then complain very lou
On 10/19/2013 2:49 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: As has been pointed out to you on multiple occasions, John, the sub-bands in which unattended operation is permitted are not exclusively assigned to unattende
On 11/22/2013 1:51 PM, Bill Turner wrote: I am a little surprised that no one has brought up the question of measuring bandwidth. We need to be careful what we ask for - we just might get it. It may
Well Jeff that answer is so easy that even ray Charles could see it. John, W0JAB _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
"I am not sure, but I think Winmor, as an "AFSK" system, may be way superior to Pactor when it comes to tuning. 73 Chen, W7AY" Dont know about that. I never have had a problem tuning a pactor station
It has been pointed out before that those that complain the loudest and longest cant even copy pactor. Using here say for their facts. I have never seen a lot of the stuff they post about and I moved
who owns the rights to PACTOR? I believe it is Special Communications Systems GmbH & Co. KG ("SCS" in short). KG is the equivalent to our "limited partnership." CORRECT you are. I have the link to t
On 12/11/2013 1:47 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote in part No, the "get serious" issue with emergency communications is that there is *no need* for PACTOR III or PACTOR IV on *HF* for EMMCOMM. John, W0JAB
No, that's a *fact*. Show me *one* emergency in the US where long haul communications was disrupted to the point that more than one VHF/UHF link was required to reach the nearest working long haul te
This big thing about bandwidth is really starting to get to a lot. First it was pactor. Then it was another mode. when is the madness going to stop? When we are all using ESP ? John, W0JAB __________
Its like QLF only different. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
On 2/23/2014 3:57 PM, Robert Chudek - K0RC wrote: Facebook, on the other hand, is equivalent to a 72" HDTV with color, surround sound, video, and instant connections to your friends and family. YOU c