Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0jab@big-river.net: 71 ]

Total 71 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] About N4II's experiment... (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:11:56 -0500
Poor Joe, Aren't you aware these items are no longer of concern. All of the newest products are NGDS .. next generation defined software. I'll let all 3 of my 28's (2 ASR's 1 KSR) know they are no lo
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00114.html (9,359 bytes)

62. Re: [RTTY] List of Winlink stations (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:02:59 -0500
< Averaging it out, on 40 meters, there is a Winlink robot operating every 476 Hz just waiting to QRM you. Not good. 73 Terry, AB5K Excuse me, but was this NOT the very reason that the "auto" sub ban
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00121.html (8,017 bytes)

63. Re: [RTTY] List of Winlink stations (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:01:50 -0500
Ah, if it were only so in reality. Winlink interprets the subband restriction as specifically **not** applying to their system. See paragraph #2 on this page: Then what was the purpose of the sub ban
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00134.html (8,523 bytes)

64. Re: [RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:11:26 -0500
Lack of experimentation? Page 64 of April QST, H4FSK from KN6KB. March was my last QST. Has it been posted anyplace else? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00150.html (9,191 bytes)

65. Re: [RTTY] Legality of Circumventing Commercial Maritime ISP Services?? (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:55:02 -0500
On 3/16/2014 5:35 PM, Peter Laws wrote: Perhaps someone should point out to Sailmail the amount of revenue they are losing. Of course, we can't be sure if those transmissions coming from sailboats ar
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00153.html (8,011 bytes)

66. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:37:52 -0500
Auto sub band was created to reduce QRM from the PACTOR ect mode so called robots. The only problem was that others would wonder and then complain when QRM'ed. To bad that all "will" not use that sug
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00168.html (7,918 bytes)

67. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Band Plan proposal (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:58:07 -0500
* Given that the unattended digital stations are in violation of part 97 by passing commercial traffic This is interesting in that most of my time is devoted to pactor I'm yet to see this on any ham
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00176.html (7,813 bytes)

68. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:18:41 -0500
On 3/18/2014 8:34 PM, it was wrote: In part used for something and at a minimum a email could be sent to both stations informing them of intentional interference. Was it intentional interference or c
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00197.html (9,538 bytes)

69. Re: [RTTY] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:12:08 -0500
On 3/19/2014 1:34 PM, §97.113 Prohibited transmissions. (a) No amateur station shall transmit: (5) Communications, on a regular basis, which could reasonably be furnished alternatively through other
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00204.html (8,603 bytes)

70. Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:09:13 -0500
73, Ron K0IDT But again allow me to point out that for some time now these stations have been in their own sub band. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00215.html (8,381 bytes)

71. Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo (score: 1)
Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:32:32 -0500
Demonstrably false. Nowhere in part 97 are unattended stations in the US granted exclusive access to any frequency or set of frequencies. Unattended stations are expected to share frequencies with at
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00217.html (8,959 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu