Mail Archive Search: <+from:w0mu@w0mu.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w0mu@w0mu.com: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

161. [RTTY] Fwd: RE: W1AW bulletin operations (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:38:05 -0600; This is not an official statement by the FCC but it is by Bill Cross who is a ham and works for the FCC. If we want this behavior to cease we can send wav files this behavior to the FCC and let the e; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00065.html (9,943 bytes)
162. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: RE: W1AW bulletin operations (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 18:35:18 -0600; Mike, I have made no rude comments about anyone on this list. I have posed some questions and stated some facts and got an opinion from an employee at the FCC about the possible rule violations conce; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00066.html (9,811 bytes)
163. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 06:51:35 -0600; Because it is a huge undertaking by the coordinators. Each individual operators log has to be sent to the ARRL then they have to upload each log separately to capture the proper country and grid. I h; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00068.html (7,554 bytes)
164. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 09:51:58 -0600; Colorado was sent to the ARRL on June 2nd. Mike W0MU The current missing in action are: CO, SD, MO, WY and KP4 Dick AA5VU _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00078.html (7,929 bytes)
165. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 10:12:23 -0600; Too busy working on new talking points for RM-11708? Mike W0MU Interesting that someone at ARRL HQ can't be bothered to turn them around (upload to LotW) for an entire business week. 73, ... Joe, W4T; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00080.html (9,783 bytes)
166. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:23:19 -0600; What do you mean do not include duplicates? You mean duplicate logs from the same guy or duplicate contacts? Mike W0MU On 6/8/2014 11:20 AM, Al Kozakiewicz wrote: Just FYI, the uploads to LoTW are be; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00084.html (9,771 bytes)
167. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 18:13:06 -0600; I hope you are talking about exact duplicates which makes sense and not someone that worked W1AW/X multiple times on the same band mode. I thought LOTW removed or disregarded duplicate contacts......; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00089.html (11,376 bytes)
168. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 08:42:07 -0600; The ARRL does not care about deliberate interference. They do it on a daily basis with the bulletins and code practice sessions and they either don't care or talked themselves into believing that the; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00095.html (18,560 bytes)
169. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:09:14 -0600; Paul. Apparently you missed the email I received from the FCC that stated that the regulation quoted that allows them to pay a control op does not allow them to ignore any other rule. We are talking; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00098.html (22,091 bytes)
170. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:06:13 -0600; If the ARRL Can claim unrestricted use of a set of frequencies, so can anyone. If you want to twist a rule that simply allows them to pay a control into a a completely new rule that says they effecti; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00100.html (24,113 bytes)
171. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:50:59 -0600; Failing to listen prior to using a frequency constitutes willful interference. When they fire up 6 or more transmitters each and everyday at various times without ever listening most people would dra; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00103.html (10,893 bytes)
172. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 and the ARRL (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:13:31 -0600; RM-11708 and the ARRL issue are related. What we are seeing and will see more of if 11708 passes is willful interference along with 2.8khz wide signals. Section 97.101(d) of the Commission's Rules pr; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00113.html (9,678 bytes)
173. [RTTY] ARRL willful interference (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:23:17 -0600; The person/station/operator using the frequency has every right to continue to use that frequency except in the case of an emergency. The ARRL and W1AW willfully interfered with you. Plain and simple; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00115.html (12,841 bytes)
174. Re: [RTTY] W1AW 80M RTTY Interference (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:24:49 -0600; Hard to believe since CW can be used everywhere in the band...................... Sounds like a QFU to me. Mike W0MU A year or so ago, I asked ARRL if anything could be done to move the 80M W1AW CW t; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00116.html (7,806 bytes)
175. Re: [RTTY] ARRL willful interference (score: 1): Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:30:46 -0600; Why do we keep having to cover or make excuses for rule violations? For the record I am complaining about the willful interference by the ARRL W1AW control operators. The bulletins and code practice; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00127.html (10,173 bytes)
176. Re: [RTTY] ARRL willful interference (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:35:04 -0600; Actually I have spent the time discussing this with the FCC and provided his opinion to the list and will be discussing this further with them. I am sure all the ARRL fan bots will be scurrying to te; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00133.html (9,582 bytes)
177. [RTTY] 2 tone vs MMTTY (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:24:46 -0600; During the W1AW/0 Colorado event a number of the guys reported that they felt 2 tone did a better job than MMTTY. This all anecdotal. I have been using both on and off and most time while chasing DX; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00154.html (6,587 bytes)
178. Re: [RTTY] How can we recrut new comments to the FCC site? (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:11:15 -0600; How about emails or letters to their respective IARU representatives? Would they have a bit more pull or influence than the average ham? Mike W0MU John, but those of us outside the US can't file anyt; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00155.html (11,682 bytes)
179. Re: [RTTY] de dd1li ...... dh7lf sk (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:03:07 -0600; Sorry to hear this news. My thoughts are with you and the family. RIP, 73 and Gud DX DH7LF. Mike W0MU I'm sorry to inform you, that my father Franz, DH7LF, died yesterday evening due to his lung canc; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00179.html (9,668 bytes)
180. Re: [RTTY] 2 tone vs MMTTY (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:30:28 -0600; Since N1MM is going through an upgrade I tossed this idea off one of the N1MM RTTY guys. He said that the concept is pretty cool but he did not see a way to easily integrate in to the new program. Mi; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00198.html (9,924 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]