Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0mu@w0mu.com: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Frequencies (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:50:00 -0700
I sure didn't expect that answer. So who do we talk to about finding another person to handle this contest and I don't think we need people that make statements like "mine are the only ones that coun
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00151.html (10,032 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 08:47:52 -0700
Would using the beacon system to check propagation put you into the assisted category? I am all for the beacon network. What I don't like is the apparent feeling of ownership of the frequencies by th
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00169.html (8,438 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:37:49 -0700
My problem has been the emails received where the beacon people would like me to believe those frequencies are theirs which is not correct. They have no more right to use a frequency than any other l
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00172.html (9,574 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 18:36:29 -0700
Ahh so I am a multi op station and I will be operating on .01 of every band all the time. I guess they are mine now. ???!!!! Heck there is a big Multi op station and their sideband has been out of th
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00177.html (9,881 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] Sprint Rules Question (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:01:05 -0600
While dueling CQ's is fine. I think it is contrary to the intent of the rules. I think you should not be allowed to make same band contacts on the same frequency just because you made one on in betwe
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00227.html (10,210 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] Sprint Rules Question (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:04:57 -0600
SO2R IMHO has effectively exploited the rules. A single radio station does not have this capability to circumvent what I believe was the intent of the rules. I don't believe the intent of the contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00233.html (10,343 bytes)

27. [RTTY] W0MU NA Sprint RTTY QRP (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:34:47 -0600
NA Sprint RTTY Contest Call: W0MU Operator(s): W0MU Station: W0MU Class: Single Op QRP QTH: CO Operating Time (hrs): 4 Summary: Band QSOs Op Time -- 80: 39 40: 55 20: 35 -- Total: 129 Mults = 27 Tota
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00239.html (6,932 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:51:29 -0600
I am on board. I don't think I had the CQ at the end of my message. I tried to look but I forgot to save my key file in N1MM and what I was using is gone. I would also like to ask that stations pleas
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00257.html (12,743 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:30:37 -0600
And the key to know who's frequency it is in sprint is by the way the exchange should be done. Example: Me: CQ NA W0MU W0MU CQ NA ED: W0YK W0YK ME: W0YK W0MU 1 MIKE CO His call then my call says W0YK
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00260.html (11,087 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:28:33 -0600
The quote was from my email. It is a signature. I just changed it. I failed to space between my post and the one I was responding to so the quote and the previous message all ran together. This was t
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00264.html (9,473 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] how can I log OL6X for the sprint? (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:23:32 -0600
Or how old is your cty file. OL should be recognized. CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194 "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Be
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00270.html (9,335 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] how can I log OL6X for the sprint? (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:44:26 -0600
I am sure that N1MM puts DX down as DX and not their prefix. That part is working. CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194 "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongu
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00284.html (10,936 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] QRX for a while... (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:21:48 -0600
I would be happy to have Barry over if those come. We have a few big gun stations in Colorado. Welcome Barry! Mike W0MU Castle Rock, CO CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194 "A slip of t
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00367.html (9,739 bytes)

34. [RTTY] FW: QRX for a while... (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:33:25 -0600
He is always welcome to this "little pistol" in Denver! Stu N0LEF _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rt
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00369.html (6,687 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:24:32 -0600
So do you believe what your radio received and the print you received or do you depend on others to tell you who you worked? You worked who you logged. If you believe spot data alone shame on you. I
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00054.html (9,140 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] T8NF (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:14:47 -0600
I operate from CO and MT and people are always losing contacts for the same reason. How could it be a contact if one does not even know who they worked. Heck if you need the card so bad send QSL's to
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-04/msg00057.html (12,102 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] Super Check Partial (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:03:53 -0700
Yes but contesters are participating more and more in RTTY so why wait for an update to the RTTY database when most of the new players are already in a general version. CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-03/msg00030.html (8,901 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] Disturbing Observations (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:42:54 -0600
Please report him. I have heard this too. This is not a problem with SO2R it is a problem with the operator. We don't remove cars from the road because the speed or break the rules, they get tickets
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00179.html (10,533 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:49:59 -0600
Not all SO2 ops do this and there are lots of frequencies especially on CW. CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194 "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you m
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00203.html (10,834 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:54:10 -0600
Where do you draw the line? My radio has two separate receivers and two vfo's. One radio. I can change bands very fast if I want. So you want to classify every piece of gear on someones shack? CC Pac
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00205.html (9,011 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
This search system is powered by Namazu