Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w4tv@subich.com: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:03:55 -0400
No Bill, I live on a five acre lot and can put up anything I want if I had the time and the checkbook. I choose not to do so at the present time - but I reserve the right to change my mind. Wrong ag
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00437.html (10,631 bytes)

62. Re: [RTTY] Be Careful What You Ask For ... (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:25:03 -0400
For some people that is not an option ... should they be prevented from having a reasonable opportunity because of where they live? I have five acres with no limitations on antennas. I choose to use
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00442.html (9,921 bytes)

63. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:56:38 -0400
Bill, Then perhaps we're closer than it appears ... I'm favor the one transceiver/single element category - not because that's my current antenna situation - but because it provides an opportunity fo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00450.html (10,379 bytes)

64. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:07:05 -0400
Bill, You can say the same thing about high power or big antennas ... An effective station automation system and second rig for SO2R will set the average person back $3000 - $4000. A modest tribander
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00451.html (9,163 bytes)

65. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:52:26 -0400
Bill, I don't have to "prove" anything to you ... however, my contest experience goes back 30 years to my days in Central Ohio. I have been doing RTTY contests, probably two or three part-time operat
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00577.html (9,179 bytes)

66. Re: [RTTY] HELP please (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:02:37 -0400
Dick, If the Mark V goes into transmit (assuming your are using RTS for PTT), it is likely that something is wrong with the audio level going into the radio. Check the following: 1) Play Control (Mas
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00586.html (10,701 bytes)

67. Re: [RTTY] KN4LF Daily LF/MF/HF Radio Propagation Outlook #2006-015 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:15:04 -0400
I agree with Bill ... I already receive other propagation e-mail to which I have subscribed. If I want additional information, I can check any one of several sites, including sites operated by recogn
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-08/msg00105.html (11,163 bytes)

68. Re: [RTTY] Cabrillo to ADIF Converter (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:22:47 -0400
Dick, "Cabrillo" output from each contest is contest specific. That means that any conversion program must be written for the unique "cabrillo" format. Here's one source for a fair number of contests
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-08/msg00166.html (8,470 bytes)

69. Re: [RTTY] Please reset Comcast customers (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:30:47 -0400
The user of any contesting.com mailing list can go to the web page for the particular list, log in and reset their own "bounce" status. The web page address is at the bottom of every contesting.com m
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00013.html (8,968 bytes)

70. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:32:11 -0400
Doug, Just as the ARRL has recognized changes in band usage and moved their bulletin transmissions over time, the IARU "beacons" need to be moved OUT of the heavily used digital spectrum or accept QR
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00158.html (11,303 bytes)

71. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:57:30 -0400
I don't know that it is a typographical error. There was no need to make the change to the first line of the 40 meter table. It was changed. I assume the change was intentional. Administrations have
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00110.html (8,544 bytes)

72. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 01:07:17 -0400
Charlie, Look at page 41 of the Report and Order ... Under the changes on S97.305(2) you will see: That first line will make it illegal for US stations to use RTTY or any other data mode between 7.07
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00111.html (10,328 bytes)

73. Re: [RTTY] 80M RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 01:16:28 -0400
Doug, The changes to S97.301 (page 39 and 40 of the Report and Order) define "80 meters" as 3.50 - 3.60 MHz and "75 meters" 3.60 - 4.0. (with some holes for non-Extra class licensees). Section 97.305
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00112.html (7,879 bytes)

74. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 19:52:25 -0400
Tony, If you want to split hairs, no signal that is transmitted by RF (or light in fiber optics) is truly "digital." Electromagnetic signals are analog media. However, RTTY and CW certainly belong to
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00133.html (10,374 bytes)

75. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:06:28 -0400
Bill, I don't know if you are being dense or just being intentionally difficult. For a mode (specifically a "mode of emission") to be digital it is only necessary for the signal to take a limited (fi
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00144.html (10,611 bytes)

76. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:11:13 -0400
Bill, You are wrong - it does not matter what the original signal was. The mode (mode of emission or mode of transmission) is digital because the signal can take only a limited number of finite state
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00153.html (10,974 bytes)

77. Re: [RTTY] Power Requirement in old Novice Bands (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:46:49 -0400
Dick, The Report & Order revises 97.313(c) as follows: (c) No station may transmit with a transmitter power exceeding 200 W PEP: (1) On the 10.10-10.15 MHz segment; (2) When the control operator is a
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00178.html (9,189 bytes)

78. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ZL8R demo on You Tube (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:05:47 -0400
I suspect this is one of the reasons RTTY tends to be "invisible" to a lot of the major DXpeditions. Their "foundation" sponsorships tend to be attributed to CW and phone operation, their corporate s
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00213.html (9,345 bytes)

79. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ZL8R demo on You Tube (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:59:53 -0400
Oddly enough, many of larger DXpeditions are now taking interfaces like the microHAM microKEYER or USB Interface II (yes, I have an interest) either their own or "on loan" units but they are using th
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00215.html (8,253 bytes)

80. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ZL8R demo on You Tube (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:56:15 -0400
I suspect it is more a matter of planning and will ... Except for the largest expeditions, you don't often see an operation on both phone and CW on the same band. You will however often see Phone on
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00227.html (8,203 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu