Mail Archive Search: <+from:w5ben@arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:w5ben@arrl.net: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

41. [RTTY] Re: PSK31 -vs- PACTOR II/III (score: 1): Author: "Duane Budd" <w5ben@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:43:10 -0500; I agree with Phil. There is little doubt in my mind that the cheapness of PSK31 and the other so-called sound-card modes is what really got hams interested. After all, one does not need to purchase A; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00246.html (7,088 bytes)
42. RE: [RTTY] Re: PSK31 -vs- PACTOR II/III (score: 1): Author: "Duane Budd" <w5ben@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:25:29 -0500; What you say is true. But there is not ONE error-free mode using a soundcard. Until that happens, none of the modes will ever equal Pactor for reliable, error-free communications. And, most of the so; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00249.html (7,852 bytes)
43. [RTTY] Winlink and common sense (I hope!) <long> (score: 1): Author: "Duane Budd" <w5ben@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:26:41 -0400; It was refreshing to see Ekki's comments on Winlink. Many of the comments have been based on misinformation at the very least. For one thing, I do not understand comments made about PSK31 being inter; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00052.html (8,525 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 43
Page: [1] [2] [3]