Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7ry@centurytel.net: 141 ]

Total 141 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] Warble at beginning of RTTY macro (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:29:45 -0700
You haven't heard it from my signal. 73 Jim W7RY On 10/3/2013 11:04 AM, Vladimir Sidarau wrote: Certainly I have also noticed this phenomenon during the recent big event. I have heard it at the begin
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00104.html (9,931 bytes)

42. Re: [RTTY] TinyFSK modem for 45 and 75 baud (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:54:56 -0700
The Nano that I'm looking at has different pin numbers for the functions listed on the page below. Is this a problem? Looks like a cool little project for us FSK purists. Thanks 73 Jim W7RY On 10/10/
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00154.html (8,441 bytes)

43. Re: [RTTY] TinyFSK modem for 45 and 75 baud (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:04:31 -0700
Thanks Chen... The schematic for the 'knockoff' one I found on EBay is the exact same schematic I just downloaded from the Arduino site. Go figure! BUT pin the D13 line is shown as pin 16 on Andys dr
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00156.html (10,519 bytes)

44. Re: [RTTY] TinyFSK modem for 45 and 75 baud (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 04:24:25 -0700
I see what the issue is. The pin out shown on your schematic is not the chip. It's the external interface pins on the board itself. The schematic just shows the pins on the chip, not the interface pi
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00162.html (9,891 bytes)

45. Re: [RTTY] TinyFSK modem for 45 and 75 baud (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 06:52:40 -0700
So which is it? EXT FSK or hardware? 73 Jim W7RY However, many people use standard consumer-grade USB-Serial converters without true UARTs and they therefore require the EXTFSK optional module for MM
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00168.html (12,706 bytes)

46. Re: [RTTY] TinyFSK modem for 45 and 75 baud (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 08:24:29 -0700
What does this do that MMTTY and a pair of one-transistor drivers for FSK and PTT does not do? Hi Bill, Here's a concrete example if it will help. 2Tone is a tool that can help you see what you are
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00178.html (9,697 bytes)

47. [RTTY] Psuedo FSK (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:21:03 -0700
Has anyone built this circuit? http://www.w1hkj.com/FldigiHelp-3.21/PseudoFSK.html I'm thinking this would be a good alternative to using the tiny modem described here earlier. I see in the 2-Tone do
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00202.html (6,733 bytes)

48. Re: [RTTY] What 2Tone measures (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:57:04 -0700
Indeed it is helpful Andy! With all of this flying around, I was wondering if we are actually taking/making the "measurements" with accurate "test equipment". It sounds like we are not. 73 Jim W7RY O
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00211.html (8,100 bytes)

49. Re: [RTTY] RTTY K3 Roofing Filter (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 13:50:51 -0700
250 hz 73 Jim W7RY On 10/19/2013 1:38 PM, John Reilly wrote: Is there a consensus on the best K3 roofing filter for RTTY? I currently only have a 250 Hz, which isn't very useful. Thanks, - 73, John,
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00275.html (7,231 bytes)

50. Re: [RTTY] Simple filtering for SO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:40:42 -0700
They are $20.00 and $5.85 for shipping. 73 Jim W7RY http://www.qth.com/inrad/book.htm And all your questions will be answered, including how to analyze your situation. Best $15 you will spend. Note t
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00371.html (9,478 bytes)

51. Re: [RTTY] IC-7200 (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 16:24:18 -0800
Nah.... For casual contesting, the 7200 is a good choice. I've had several of them, but did not contest with it. I did run it on RTTY and it worked great. The built in sound card is pretty cool. Radi
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00009.html (8,582 bytes)

52. Re: [RTTY] Clipped calls (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:42:43 -0800
Why not use the standard CR/LF? 73 Jim W7RY Rex K7QQ The problem of clipping is most likely because your call comes too quickly for the other station - or it is difficult to pick out of the "noise" a
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00053.html (10,490 bytes)

53. Re: [RTTY] AFC solved (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:16:06 -0800
Oh you poor man... Why don't you move to the pacific northwest and have even worse propagation? 73 Jim W7RY Now if I could just improve the propagation problem I would be very happy. Thanks anyway fo
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00061.html (7,142 bytes)

54. Re: [RTTY] New Ham (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:41:36 -0800
Welcome Wayne! RTTY is my favorite mode! I operate CW and RTTY on HF (a bit of SSB with my friends on 40 or 80 meters though). I have been continuously active since 1975 and operated RTTY since 1977.
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00074.html (9,240 bytes)

55. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:53:08 -0800
I sent a simple note to my director asking why the Board did this and didn't receive a response. Nothing new here. 73 Jim W7RY On 11/20/2013 6:01 PM, Kai wrote: I think that discussion should center
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00105.html (13,896 bytes)

56. Re: [RTTY] Happy Holidays (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 08:36:06 -0800
And Merry Christmas to you too Shelby 73 Jim W7RY 73, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00178.html (7,379 bytes)

57. Re: [RTTY] Why 150W LP in Roundup? (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:52:03 -0800
In the beginning.... The ARRL did not come up with the RTTY Roundup contest... Hal, WA7EGA (now K7IRA) and Jay, WS7I came up the this contest over several glasses of single malt scotch. If you have e
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00216.html (8,643 bytes)

58. Re: [RTTY] Why 150W LP in Roundup? (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:56:51 -0800
Sorry it was Gate 2 in 1996 where I applied for a received W7RY. Jim W7RY If you have ever read the article by Hal, "The Meanest Thing we Ever Did" it is worth a read. I just did some searching and c
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00217.html (10,030 bytes)

59. Re: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 19:50:21 -0800
Since it was so misunderstood, (or so they claim) perhaps it was poorly written in the first place? 73 Jim W7RY On Behalf Of Ben Antct: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708 All, I'm appalle
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00167.html (11,733 bytes)

60. Re: [RTTY] With XP support ending... (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:23:34 -0800
Is it a contest logging program the caliber of N1MM? 73 Jim W7RY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtt
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00199.html (8,558 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu