Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7why@frontier.com: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Request for Member comment on Proposed HF Band Plan Change (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:24:42 -0800
You have to wonder why the ARRL is pushing for this. There are thousands of guys around the world on RTTY and probably just a small portion on the unattended modes. Just guys in boats or what? I gues
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00201.html (8,390 bytes)

222. Re: [RTTY] E30FB rtty? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:24:35 -0700
Oh no! You mean people might actually have to tune in the station and figure what is going on instead of 'click click' :-) 73 Tom W7WHY Tom G K0TLG _______________________________________________ RTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00038.html (8,240 bytes)

223. Re: [RTTY] Mouse performance (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:32:10 -0700
Hi Bill I am using a wireless mouse on both my computers here and don't see the 'latency' you are seeing. Mine are instantaneous, just like a wired mouse. Also use a wireless keyboard on both boxes.
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00077.html (8,270 bytes)

224. Re: [RTTY] FEC (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:17:50 -0700
Hi Tim That is what I find fun, also, in RTTY contesting. I also think that Sklimmer is going to take the fun out of it, just like it does for CW. I had my epxerience with the RTTY Skimmer in a conte
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00087.html (7,652 bytes)

225. [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:26:31 -0700
There had been some talk in the past about allowing the use of amplifiers in the NAQP RTTY test since lots of radios can't run 100 watts key down for long periods of time. I know my TS-450's won't ru
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00016.html (7,860 bytes)

226. Re: [RTTY] Contest this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:02:17 -0700
Yeah - this is gonna be fun :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00039.html (9,092 bytes)

227. Re: [RTTY] To all RTTY group members (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:48:20 -0700
That is how they get you , 'It's from a friend - it can't be a virus'. 73 Tom W7WHY. Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-08/msg00014.html (8,882 bytes)

228. Re: [RTTY] Color scheme for MMTTY RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:50:55 -0700
I like light blue background with dark blue letters. Easy on the eyes after a long time looking at the screen. 73 Tom W7WHY Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ RTTY ma
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-08/msg00015.html (7,511 bytes)

229. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:47:32 -0700
I think the whole thing boils down to 'Who's time is more important - mine of the SO2R operator." I've operated SO2R on RTTY and it sometimes happens that there are 2 stations on the hook at the same
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00088.html (9,240 bytes)

230. Re: [RTTY] RTTY and Skimmer was: Re: Decoder performance on crowded bands (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:05:35 -0700
One thing I wondered about was the 'not licensed' stations being spotted. They are not legal to work as hams are not allowed to talk to someone who is not a ham (other than on a station controlled le
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00009.html (10,591 bytes)

231. Re: [RTTY] Contester preference - 1- versus 2-decimal-place spots (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:19:17 -0700
I don't use RTTY Skimmer, but when I'm running, I would rather everyone is not exactly on the same frequency when calling me. I just use the RIT and {clearrrit} functions. For me it's aggravating to
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00088.html (10,972 bytes)

232. Re: [RTTY] Problem with WAE log upload robot - OM2015TITANIC (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:46:54 -0800
Hi Tim I think the bigger problem is why the heck does someone use a call like this in a contest? With a call that long, there is bound to be a lot of busted calls as one small hit in a call that lon
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-11/msg00022.html (9,295 bytes)

233. Re: [RTTY] VP8STI on RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:31:41 -0800
If you look at the pictured on their website, the antennas looked like they were really low - not more than 15 feet or so off the ground. That probably is why they have been so weak. 73 Tom W7WHY ___
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00142.html (8,764 bytes)

234. Re: [RTTY] Friend File (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 08:58:48 -0800
That is what I do here, too. I don't say 'hi' to everyone because I don't know everyone. If someone is running, you shouldn't do it, unless you know them really well, as it just slows them down. I ca
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00021.html (10,369 bytes)

235. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 09:22:19 -0800
SO2R on RTTY is being done by a lot now, but is it fair to have someone standing by, waiting after your CQ while you are working someone else on the other radio. I's seeing some now that will call CQ
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00089.html (6,556 bytes)

236. Re: [RTTY] FCC proposed 80m. expansion (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:00:13 -0800
On most nights you can tune around the 80 meter RTTY band and there is nothing there except some PSK and JT-65. What would be wrong with more operators there? Why would the FCC want to expand the ban
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00013.html (7,682 bytes)

237. Re: [RTTY] [Bulk] Re: BARTG rule question (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:36:51 -0700
If you just go ahead and do SO2R, will the robot rescore you entry to SOE, or kick it out? If you don't care, just go ahead and just do it and let the robot worry about it. I know I'm not gonna win a
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00078.html (8,916 bytes)

238. [RTTY] Work dupes (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:19:07 -0700
Why do some stations insist on telling you that you;re a dupe when you are not a dupe? Last night on 40, I had a W9 station tell me I was a dupe and he gave me his number 31 when he was not in my log
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00092.html (6,971 bytes)

239. Re: [RTTY] [Bulk] BARTG (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:23:27 -0700
Hi Tom Yep, it sure is bad here, too. I am also doing the 6-hour segment but am only up to 45 q's now. Ten and 15 are both dead here. Another problem we hae here on the left coast is that everyone ha
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00093.html (8,249 bytes)

240. Re: [RTTY] Dayton Hamvention RTTY Contest Forum (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:03:51 -0700
Hi Hank Your comment about 'flexible macros' with number 9 is spot on. Most of the time just sending the exchange once is sufficient. In the BARTG last week, on the high bands, one time was 99.9% eff
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00192.html (11,242 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
This search system is powered by Namazu